Re: Norwich Cadets Hockey 2011-2012: In Search of a Title
Did you attend last February's Castleton Norwich game?
No, I did not.
The Norwich player in the example I cited ripped the Castleton player's helmet off. There was a lot more than "movement of the glove to the vicinity of the facemask", but yet you assumed by looking at the score sheet that since it was a Norwich player then it was just movement of the glove to the vicinity of the facemask.
You fell into your own trap and highlighted my point by assuming that since a Norwich player was involved then it was just a minor thing. However I spoke about at thei time and a Norwich follower brushed it off as an "aberration".
Where did I say that it had to have been the lesser version of facemasking simply
because it was a Norwich player? I didn't. Stop putting words into my mouth. If it happened how you describe it, then the refs got it wrong. That absolutely should have been a DQ. There are grey areas in the rule book, which is why I advised you not to look at a score sheet and immediately make assumptions as to what happened. This is not a grey area, and so I pointed out what the referee's interpretation clearly was at that time. Again, if it happened as you described it, then the referee got it wrong. But, having not seen the incident myself, I can only take your version (as well as the official's) as personal interpretations of events.
Do I believe that Norwich players are incapable of committing violations like this? No. As infrequent as it may be, they are just as capable as any human being to drop to that level of idiocy. For the record: same goes for Plattsburgh Players.
Here is the oriningal thread:
http://board.uscho.com/showthread.p...cries-whines-objections-complaints-here/page2
Norwich fans felt that the CSC President should step in to rein in the accumulation of penalties and expressed that coaches (implying their coach) routinely disciplines players for inappropiate play, yet you call a serious situation that was totally in the control of the player an aberratrion.
As an interesting note - I do agree over the years that some CSC players should be reminded in someway (benched?) that they take stupid penalties, but that is something Coach Todd controls. He has done it on occasion but IMO should be more proactive. Time will tell - most coaches adjust thir coaching style as the years pass.
I can't speak for anybody but myself. Do I agree that the incident should taken as an aberration? No. Regardless of how serious it is, if you are guilty of a dumb penalty that isn't a part of the natural flow of the game (that is to say, isn't a mistake play like a hooking or an accidental tripping, etc. I'm basically referring to fighting and any nonsense after the whistle), you need to be disciplined in some way by the coaching staff. That let's the player know that the behavior in question will not be tolerated, thus bettering the team as a whole: the less time they spend with this nonsense, the more time they can focus on improving their individual skill and their team chemistry. That's really what these individual players need to get through their skulls, and it's the coaches responsibility to do just that.
But Benching a player is only one way to discipline a player. And it need not be for an entire game. I've seen players commit a penalty early in the 2nd period, and sit on the bench the rest of that period (defensive pairings getting shuffled during that time to account for only having 5 D), but be allowed to play again in the 3rd. It all depends on how the coach interprets the severity of the act, and where is falls on his disciplinary scale. But looking at a box score, you'd think that player never got disciplined at all. Other ways to discipline include: extra sprints at practice, a monetary fine that goes into a fund that will benefit the team, make the player clean the locker room, basically anything the coach thinks appropriate. Some coaches are more public about how they discipline their guys than others. Again I say: we will know that the player has been adequately disciplined when they stop acting like goons on the ice.
All I was trying to say is that it's on Coach Todd to discipline this player. He can do that in whatever way he wants. And so long as I have no proof to the contrary, I will assume he did just that. By all accounts, he is a respectable guy and a great hockey coach. I mean no disrespect to him, but he's been dealt a very tough hand and now the spotlight's on him. If he doesn't react in an appropriate manner, it's his reputation that's on the line right now.