I would have to say that he can definitely coach. How has he done the last few years? I would say last year was the first time the team underperformed under his watch. He has produced more with less over the last few years. Look at 07-08 we were just under .500 with these lines:
McNeely (fr) - Vitale (jr) - Macleod (fr) 85 pts
Ginand (jr) - Silva (fr) - Russo (sr) 47 pts
Costello (so) - Rassey (jr) - Kreamer (so) 25 pts
McCauley (jr) - Costa (so) - Guzior (so) 47 pts
Donovan (so) 8 pts
How many of these players would have been expected to contribute on other teams? Only McNeely, Vitale, and Mcleod had more than one year of solid productivity. Ginand and Kreamer both had a solid season the following year. My point is our second third and fourth lines have not only been weak, but have been comprised of players who would have rarely dressed on other hockey east teams. Personel wise we are in the category of the Providences, Merrimacks, and UML's for the last few years. So what differentiates us and UML from MC and PC? I think utilizing the talent available has been the key, and that comes from coaching. With new recruits I think we can expect more solid lines in the coming years. Ultimately we are looking at the possibility of having multiple scoring lines, I know, its amazing.