I'm with ya SS. I hate the **** things. Keep em in the NHL.None. It's a terrible concept and I will never accept it as a legtimate way to finish a game.
Epic collapse happened last year at the final five. This is far from epic but it still sucked.It's hard to see the collapse of the UND team since they lost their logo. They used to be a skill and hard hitting team and now there's only one line of skill. With such an epic collapse in the third period I feel sympathy for the UND fans.
I only hope this because we know they'll never bring back OT til someone wins. Ties suck. And I refute your statement, sir!This is the dumbest post in this thread...and that's saying something.
I only hope this because we know they'll never bring back OT til someone wins. Ties suck. And I refute your statement, sir!
Epic collapse happened last year at the final five. This is far from epic but it still sucked.
Do you like ties? If not, then how to eliminate them? I know some people who are not hockey fans, and they don't understand why an athletic competition should end in a tie. In bouncy ball, they play til someone wins, football rarely has a tie. I remember the days of the OT til someone wins; that's what still should be done. Today's fans attention spans are not long enough to endure that, so to keep fans in the seats, they invented the shootout. For Pete's sake, people were leaving Mariucci before regulation time was over!you know what's worse than a tie? A shootout.
Do you like ties? If not, then how to eliminate them? I know some people who are not hockey fans, and they don't understand why an athletic competition should end in a tie. In bouncy ball, they play til someone wins, football rarely has a tie. I remember the days of the OT til someone wins; that's what still should be done. Today's fans attention spans are not long enough to endure that, so to keep fans in the seats, they invented the shootout. For Pete's sake, people were leaving Mariucci before regulation time was over!
Do you like ties? If not, then how to eliminate them? I know some people who are not hockey fans, and they don't understand why an athletic competition should end in a tie. In bouncy ball, they play til someone wins, football rarely has a tie. I remember the days of the OT til someone wins; that's what still should be done. Today's fans attention spans are not long enough to endure that, so to keep fans in the seats, they invented the shootout. For Pete's sake, people were leaving Mariucci before regulation time was over!
I wouldn't say the worst game of the season but they played worse on Saturday than Friday. It was clear from the start that they were off their game. The puck kept hopping the sticks rather and fanned passes. Not sure if they were gripping too tight or what. I appreciated the effort to the end to get the tie. It would have been easy just let it go.
I thought Haula being less than 100% had a lot to do with the pp failure.I don't know. In terms of who controlled play I thought Saturday was incredibly similar to Friday. The real difference between the two nights is that UND converted a higher percentage of their opportunities.
Playing with the lead is easier than playing from behind. UND was able to get ahead and that made the game a little easier for them, a little more difficult for Minnesota.
All things considered I was content with the tie. Wilcox was fighting the puck a little bit, and UND was a bit more dangerous in how they were attacking the net.
The one thing that UND did very well is shut down the MN PP. 1-8 on the
weekend. We could argue whether that was UND doing something special or MN just being off their game. My opinion is that it is generally a bit of both.
MN had 3 PP's on Saturday, and only one of them did they have any sort of flow or quality possession in the offensive zone.
Meh. Agree to disagree I guess. Without checking(too lazy), I'm pretty sure the Gophers outshot UND on Saturday, but overall I think UND dictated the pace.I don't know. In terms of who controlled play I thought Saturday was incredibly similar to Friday. The real difference between the two nights is that UND converted a higher percentage of their opportunities.
Playing with the lead is easier than playing from behind. UND was able to get ahead and that made the game a little easier for them, a little more difficult for Minnesota.
All things considered I was content with the tie. Wilcox was fighting the puck a little bit, and UND was a bit more dangerous in how they were attacking the net.
The one thing that UND did very well is shut down the MN PP. 1-8 on the weekend. We could argue whether that was UND doing something special or MN just being off their game. My opinion is that it is generally a bit of both.
MN had 3 PP's on Saturday, and only one of them did they have any sort of flow or quality possession in the offensive zone.
I thought Haula being less than 100% had a lot to do with the pp failure.
Please kill this thread. It's over.
What? Are you the Moderator now? Don't like the thread, don't read it.Please kill this thread. It's over.