What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

DrDemento said:
I am pretty sure that he is not proposing killing anyone-so genocide would not be the proper term. He is proposing that there be less birthing and immigration into the country which would 'thin the herd'. But then again, maybe I read it wrong.:confused:
Click to expand...
Talking of "thinning the herd" makes me think of genocide, even if he is just talking about requiring baby-making licences.
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

bigblue_dl said:
Talking of "thinning the herd" makes me think of genocide, even if he is just talking about requiring baby-making licences.
Click to expand...

Pregnancy being illegal unless you have a licence? Sounds like the awful Demolition Man future world to me.
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

FlagDUDE08 said:
Pregnancy being illegal unless you have a licence? Sounds like the awful Demolition Man future world to me.
Click to expand...
Nah, just have the kids born without a licence taken from their parents and sent involuntarily to Obama Youth camps for indoctrination and military training.
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

bigblue_dl said:
Nah, just have the kids born without a licence taken from their parents and sent involuntarily to Obama Youth camps for indoctrination and military training.
Click to expand...

Nice you don't want to make sex illegal and have every child be a test tube baby...
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

DrDemento said:
I am pretty sure that he is not proposing killing anyone-so genocide would not be the proper term. He is proposing that there be less birthing and immigration into the country which would 'thin the herd'. But then again, maybe I read it wrong.:confused:
Click to expand...
That's what I'm more referring to.

FlagDUDE08 said:
Pregnancy being illegal unless you have a licence? Sounds like the awful Demolition Man future world to me.
Click to expand...
That whole three sea shells thing is bit of a concern, I'll give you that.

My idea wouldn't be so much as a licence, more like your first one is free. After the kid has been born and all, its either sign up for a free vasectomy for guys and tube tying for women, or each partner forks up say 500 bucks to avoid going thru the procedure. Figure that's high enough of fee to make it worth the time to not want to have to pay for it another time, and yet low enough that somebody that wants to claim religious whatever would find it simpler to just pay the fee instead of fighting it. And **** it, there will be real sex ed going on in public schools talking about rubbers and other BC as well, so the kids can learn how to avoid going thru all of that hassle in the first place. You don't want your kids to know about that? Homeschool em full time or send em to a private school.
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

bigmrg74 said:
That's what I'm more referring to.


That whole three sea shells thing is bit of a concern, I'll give you that.

My idea wouldn't be so much as a licence, more like your first one is free. After the kid has been born and all, its either sign up for a free vasectomy for guys and tube tying for women, or each partner forks up say 500 bucks to avoid going thru the procedure. Figure that's high enough of fee to make it worth the time to not want to have to pay for it another time, and yet low enough that somebody that wants to claim religious whatever would find it simpler to just pay the fee instead of fighting it. And **** it, there will be real sex ed going on in public schools talking about rubbers and other BC as well, so the kids can learn how to avoid going thru all of that hassle in the first place. You don't want your kids to know about that? Homeschool em full time or send em to a private school.
Click to expand...

Or you could just move to China and you'd get all that. :rolleyes:

Bob Barker reminding you to help control the human population: Have your children spayed or neutered. Goodbye, everybody! :p
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

FlagDUDE08 said:
Or you could just move to China and you'd get all that. :rolleyes:

Bob Barker reminding you to help control the human population: Have your children spayed or neutered. Goodbye, everybody! :p
Click to expand...
You like paying for welfare mom with 5 different kids with 5 different baby daddies?? Hell, under my proposal, there, her first one was free, but she would at least have to pay $2000 easy to pop out the other 4 kids. They all could be the first ones for the 5 baby daddies, but I would think that they would be a little more inclined to get the vasectomy, and not have to worry so much about putting their tallywackers into every loose piece of *** out there and have to worry about there being another baby in 9 months.
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

FOIA hearing on whether the government should release death photos of Bin Laden. I've argued here previously that we have a right to see those photos. We bought and paid for them. The government's central argument is that release of the photos/videos would cause anti-American feelings. That might be true. On the other hand, those savages have shown repeatedly that they don't require an actual event to get them in a tizzy. Remember the Korans "flushed down a toilet?" Or a video that nobody ever saw? The photo I'd really like to see is the one showing the look on that POS's face just moments before the lights went out. God is great, prik.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/10/world/bin-laden-photos/index.html?hpt=hp_t3
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

Old Pio said:
FOIA hearing on whether the government should release death photos of Bin Laden. I've argued here previously that we have a right to see those photos. We bought and paid for them. The government's central argument is that release of the photos/videos would cause anti-American feelings. That might be true. On the other hand, those savages have shown repeatedly that they don't require an actual event to get them in a tizzy. Remember the Korans "flushed down a toilet?" Or a video that nobody ever saw? The photo I'd really like to see is the one showing the look on that POS's face just moments before the lights went out. God is great, prik.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/10/world/bin-laden-photos/index.html?hpt=hp_t3
Click to expand...
I agree. Publish them. I don't give a flying **** if the towelheads throw a hissy fit.
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

bigblue_dl said:
I agree. Publish them. I don't give a flying **** if the towelheads throw a hissy fit.
Click to expand...

Many in the West couch their cowardice in the face of Islamist terror threats in terms of "not offending" people who are perpetually offended. As an example, the Yale University Press published a history of the Danish cartoon incident--which did not include the actual cartoons!
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

Old Pio said:
Many in the West couch their cowardice in the face of Islamist terror threats in terms of "not offending" people who are perpetually offended. As an example, the Yale University Press published a history of the Danish cartoon incident--which did not include the actual cartoons!
Click to expand...

Or how about South Park episodes 200 and 201?
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

FlagDUDE08 said:
Or how about South Park episodes 200 and 201?
Click to expand...

I didn't see them in first run, evidently I'm never going to get to see them. To my knowledge, the only print edition of a major American newspaper to publish the cartoons was the Philadelphia Inquirer. The NYT likes to bray about speaking "truth to power" when it comes to an evil b*stard like George W. Bush, but loses its cojones entirely when it comes to Islamist savages. And it's certainly not alone. Only the most prominent.
 
Last edited:
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

New Jersey teacher loses appeal of her termination. She had referred to students as "future criminals" on her Facebook page. A court dismissed her First Amendment defense. I'm a strong First Amendment guy, and I find this decision troubling. If Fred Phelps is protected by the First Amendment (and he is) why not this silly lady?

http://www.nj.com/bergen/index.ssf/...ts_future_criminals.html#incart_river_default
 
Last edited:
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

Old Pio said:
Social Security Administration decides gas passing isn't so bad afterall.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...orker-after-flatulence-reprimand-went-public/
Click to expand...
Wow, a 5 page reprimand about someone passing gas. That's a great use of government money.

I wonder if that's the SSA office in Woodlawn (the mailing address is Baltimore). If so, my dad used to work there....and has since retired, so the reprimand is not about him.
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

UncleRay said:
So who should the union back? The gassy hack looking for a disability vacation who is being unfairly targeted for an uncontrollable condition? Or his poor, put-upon colleagues who must endure the nosehair-curling emanations of his backside?
Click to expand...

This took months to resolve. And the letter informing him of the reprimand was 5 pages long, complete with a breakdown of each, uh, emanation. You have a massive bureauocracy on one side and a union on the other. If he truly does have an uncontrollable medical condition (doubtful, IMO) then his bosses should move him to a remote location in the office where he can toot away to his heart's content. If he's just a vulgar pig (far more likely, IMO) then why should any of his colleagues have to put up with him?
 
Re: Nice Planet, Part 2: A-holes on parade

wolverineTrumpet said:
Wow, a 5 page reprimand about someone passing gas. That's a great use of government money.

I wonder if that's the SSA office in Woodlawn (the mailing address is Baltimore). If so, my dad used to work there....and has since retired, so the reprimand is not about him.
Click to expand...

The picture of the dude that made the rounds was taken at a theme park and showed him standing next to (wait for it) Pepe Le Pew.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top