Re: Nice Planet 2012
Are the mayors of Boston and Chicago merely pandering in the Chick-fil-a "controversy?' Who knows? It could be, after the chest thumping, some sort of "agreement" will be reached by which these intolerant sob's allow the company to open stores in their cities.
This intolerance is especially irritating, coming as it does from people who regularly, constantly, obnoxiously espouse the virtues of tolerance--frequently (usually?) demanding tolerance or at least understanding for America's enemies (Ward Churchill, Susan Sontag).
In this case, Chick-fil-a has made no secret of the religious views of its principals. Being closed on Sundays should be enough of a hint. And the recent statement by the CEO about their support for traditional marriage is hardly revolutionary.
What would be relevant to all the political posturing would be claims that Chick-fil-a discriminates against prospective franchisees, or suppliers, or employees or demands that franchisees discriminate against THEiR employees or customers. I haven't heard any such claims. Have you?
Discriminating against customers would be particularly difficult. How do you administer polygraphs to people in a mall?
The pipsqueak Chicago alderman opposing a store in his ward has modestly suggested that the company might get his seal of approval if it rewrites its employee handbook to his specificiations. Does this grandiose political twerp realize how unintentionally funny it is to demand a company with 50 thousand employees at over 1600 locations should conform its company materials to HIS standards?
Not to be outdone, Roseanne Barr said Chick-fil-a customers "deserve" to get cancer. That pretty much sums up the "thinking" of the tolerance crowd.
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1061148754