What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

I would have never pegged Lil Jon as a hockey fan.

YEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!!

karililjon.jpg
 
Last edited:
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

Found this gem on Youtube.

<iframe width="425" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/0ShP7fNBeHU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

FWIW, discussion is that, for '11-'12 anyway, divisions would remain the same (Winnipeg would be in the SE), then they would re-do divisions for '12-'13 (since there really isn't time to hash realignment out). Really, all that would be at issue for two different schedules is travel.

Also, here's today's early development in this whole bizarre situation:

http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/...jon-bruckheimer-thrashers-owners.html?ana=twt

To quote Lil Jon, "What?"
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

FWIW, discussion is that, for '11-'12 anyway, divisions would remain the same (Winnipeg would be in the SE), then they would re-do divisions for '12-'13 (since there really isn't time to hash realignment out). Really, all that would be at issue for two different schedules is travel.

Also, here's today's early development in this whole bizarre situation:

http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/...jon-bruckheimer-thrashers-owners.html?ana=twt

This line in the story makes me say "Hmmmm."

Lil Jon, a big success in hip hop, and who has made many new fans courtesy of his run on the most recent installment of “The Apprentice” television show, has loved Atlanta hockey for years going back to the Atlanta Flames.

L'il John, aka Jonathan Mortimer Smith, was born on January 17, 1971. That would make him all of 9 when the Flames moved to Calgary.

I'm just sayin'.....not sure it passes the smell test. :confused:
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

This line in the story makes me say "Hmmmm."
L'il John, aka Jonathan Mortimer Smith, was born on January 17, 1971. That would make him all of 9 when the Flames moved to Calgary.

I'm just sayin'.....not sure it passes the smell test. :confused:
Are we sure the editor didn't mix up Knights and Flames?

Lil' Jon has been part of the Thrashers culture for a good portion of the franchise, especially for the Kari Lehtonen era. Kari even had the "Yeeeaaaahh!" with a caricature on the back of his helmet for a few years. (Hence the photo I posted)
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

This line in the story makes me say "Hmmmm."



L'il John, aka Jonathan Mortimer Smith, was born on January 17, 1971. That would make him all of 9 when the Flames moved to Calgary.

I'm just sayin'.....not sure it passes the smell test. :confused:

What you cannot be a fan if you're under ten?
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

What you cannot be a fan if you're under ten?

I was thinking the same thing. I was barely ten when the North Stars left. I was a huge fan, and since I was so young, it seemed like it was a traumatic experience at the time. I remember it very well.
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

But apparently this shouldn't apply for Southern teams. They have no fans anyway, so there obviously wouldn't be anyone under the age of 10 brought to the games.

[Removes tongue from cheek]
 
FWIW, discussion is that, for '11-'12 anyway, divisions would remain the same (Winnipeg would be in the SE), then they would re-do divisions for '12-'13 (since there really isn't time to hash realignment out). Really, all that would be at issue for two different schedules is travel.
]
Yeah, I doubt that they would have time to really do a whole scale realinement of the whole league. That would be something where everybody is going to fight about who gets to go where and with whom. Hell, the league might be better off just putting all of the teams that didn't make the playoffs on ping pong balls, and alternate which team goes in which conference. After that, let the owners and GM's get together and let them draft the rest of the teams that made the playoffs. And if there's a team in one conference that clearly would rather be in the other conference, and that conference wants them, then they can work out a trade. Seems to me that it would be about the fairest way of doing it.
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

No NHL teams below 39 degrees 40 minutes. 39-40 or fight.
I hate to go against the crowd here, but I can't agree with this. Hockey is an awesome sport, and I think it's selfish of those of us who live in the North to say that we're the only ones who should get to have local NHL teams (and, for that matter, excludes some teams that aren't particularly "Southern"; even the Avs just barely make the cut). Some teams below that line (Blues, Sharks, Caps) draw well, and some teams above it (Islanders, Blue Jackets, this year even the Avs) draw poorly. If a Southern city has a solid fan base and supports their team well, why shouldn't they be able to do so? Southerners are people too.

Bettman's folly wasn't in the mere idea of putting teams in the south, it was that he chose his cities poorly. There was never any need for two teams in Florida or two teams in Southern California, for example.
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

I hate to go against the crowd here, but I can't agree with this. Hockey is an awesome sport, and I think it's selfish of those of us who live in the North to say that we're the only ones who should get to have local NHL teams (and, for that matter, excludes some teams that aren't particularly "Southern"; even the Avs just barely make the cut). Some teams below that line (Blues, Sharks, Caps) draw well, and some teams above it (Islanders, Blue Jackets, this year even the Avs) draw poorly. If a Southern city has a solid fan base and supports their team well, why shouldn't they be able to do so? Southerners are people too.

Bettman's folly wasn't in the mere idea of putting teams in the south, it was that he chose his cities poorly. There was never any need for two teams in Florida or two teams in Southern California, for example.

But the Ducks are Kings are doing just fine. Aren't they?
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

The problem repeatedly has been a failure of the NHL BoG to properly investigate their prospective owners, except apparently for Jim Baisillie. Every other case they basically take the cash and ignore how it got there.

Dallas' owner: Hicks is an obvious failure, though he did have a baseball team too, so Selig didn't do his diligence either.
Phoenix: Lack thereof, and a bad arena choice
Tampa Bay's owners after Davidson sold: real estate speculators. You can guess what happened to them.
Atlanta: Some of the worst owners in history, tied up in court for years.
Nashville: Leipold and his group were dumbasses, and now they're turning gold into lead in Minnesota, of all places for hockey. New owners have gotten corporations to buy in and they added over 1,000 to their paid attendance this year.

By comparison:

Los Angeles, Anaheim, San Jose, Carolina: Sometimes lose money on their books, but you don't hear about it too much. Owners are making a solid effort locally to grow their fanbases.
Florida: losing money, but the owners seem to be fine with it.
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

But the Ducks are Kings are doing just fine. Aren't they?
Are they? I don't really know how their finances are. Seems to me that both of them will draw pretty well when they're competitive, poorly when they're not. Not convinced there's enough demand for both teams if both were playing well, though.
The problem repeatedly has been a failure of the NHL BoG to properly investigate their prospective owners, except apparently for Jim Baisillie. Every other case they basically take the cash and ignore how it got there.
True, maybe poor choice of owners is a better way to put it than poor choice of cities.
 
Re: NHL hockey returns to the 'Peg! Maybe?

I hate to go against the crowd here, but I can't agree with this. Hockey is an awesome sport, and I think it's selfish of those of us who live in the North to say that we're the only ones who should get to have local NHL teams (and, for that matter, excludes some teams that aren't particularly "Southern"; even the Avs just barely make the cut). Some teams below that line (Blues, Sharks, Caps) draw well, and some teams above it (Islanders, Blue Jackets, this year even the Avs) draw poorly. If a Southern city has a solid fan base and supports their team well, why shouldn't they be able to do so? Southerners are people too.

Bettman's folly wasn't in the mere idea of putting teams in the south, it was that he chose his cities poorly. There was never any need for two teams in Florida or two teams in Southern California, for example.

Personally I think the biggest problem with southern teams is having non-hockey guys buying or starting teams. I think a guy like Terry Pegula or Jeremy Jacobs would find a way to have southern hockey teams be profitable. Having someone with little understanding of hockey's structure and costs associated with even marginal success puts them at a disadvantage before the team plays one game.
 
Back
Top