Re: NFL 2014-15: Iron Fist Getting Rusty?
And had he not had one, perhaps the State of New Jersey would have handled him differently.
I think some of O's rants againt the criminal system has a point. Assuming that the second video would have resulted in a different result- which I will fully admit at this point that I don't know NJ's laws, so I don't know if the second video is, in fact, a crime or not.
But lets say that it is, and that the pre-trial program he was admitted into would not cover that offense.
Months after the agreement, we see this video which would have given us a different answer to the original offense. So two possibilities were pointed out- either the criminal process in Atlantic City is incompetent (they missed a pretty obvious video, and there are cameras all over the place in a casino- this isn't hard to legally ask for), OR they were not going to the letter of the law.
Either answer speaks pretty darned poorly for the system and the people running it. Both could easily be reasons that the people in place should not be there.
Now if the second video changes nothing, and the program that he is in is acceptable for the offense in the recent video... well, then the public outcry for that result should result in a change of the laws. Pretty simple. the people are speaking, that is what the legislature is for.
Without an NFL career, or paycheck, he probably won't have quite the same appeal for her going forward.
And had he not had one, perhaps the State of New Jersey would have handled him differently.
I think some of O's rants againt the criminal system has a point. Assuming that the second video would have resulted in a different result- which I will fully admit at this point that I don't know NJ's laws, so I don't know if the second video is, in fact, a crime or not.
But lets say that it is, and that the pre-trial program he was admitted into would not cover that offense.
Months after the agreement, we see this video which would have given us a different answer to the original offense. So two possibilities were pointed out- either the criminal process in Atlantic City is incompetent (they missed a pretty obvious video, and there are cameras all over the place in a casino- this isn't hard to legally ask for), OR they were not going to the letter of the law.
Either answer speaks pretty darned poorly for the system and the people running it. Both could easily be reasons that the people in place should not be there.
Now if the second video changes nothing, and the program that he is in is acceptable for the offense in the recent video... well, then the public outcry for that result should result in a change of the laws. Pretty simple. the people are speaking, that is what the legislature is for.