What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Priceless
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

redwing77 said:
Rodgers gets caught playing with himself and drops tosses the ball to get a better grip.

Have a great offseason Aaron. This one's all you.
Click to expand...

c'mon.... if it wasn't for him the cards would have won 50-14
 
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

That's bad luck. Could have gone either way.

AZ-NO
BAL-INDY
DAL-MIN
NYJ-SD

Not a bad lineup. I hate the say this with the Pats not in it, but that's a good weekend of football. Only six days away . . .
 
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

mookie1995 said:
c'mon.... if it wasn't for him the cards would have won 50-14
Click to expand...

And if it wasn't for him the Packers would have won. Jennings was WIDE OPEN. And then again, the play obviously was for naught as the pocket was collapsing and no one was open. So, he should have taken the sack and punted. He couldn't decide what to do (I call that playing with himself in my post) and took the loss instead.

It IS on Aaron Rodgers.
 
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

redwing77 said:
And if it wasn't for him the Packers would have won. Jennings was WIDE OPEN. And then again, the play obviously was for naught as the pocket was collapsing and no one was open. So, he should have taken the sack and punted. He couldn't decide what to do (I call that playing with himself in my post) and took the loss instead.

It IS on Aaron Rodgers.
Click to expand...

The Packer defense gave up six touchdowns. How is this loss on Rodgers?
 
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

Jason A said:
Not a bad lineup. I hate the say this with the Pats not in it, but that's a good weekend of football. Only six days away . . .
Click to expand...

probably better without the Pats in it:p
 
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

redwing77 said:
And if it wasn't for him the Packers would have won. Jennings was WIDE OPEN. And then again, the play obviously was for naught as the pocket was collapsing and no one was open. So, he should have taken the sack and punted. He couldn't decide what to do (I call that playing with himself in my post) and took the loss instead.

It IS on Aaron Rodgers.
Click to expand...

Spoken like a true Vikings fan (in other words, someone without a lot of common sense).

How about the other 40+ points Arizona scored? Ever think THOSE points might be more reflective of the game? Rodgers led the team to a great comeback in the second half. In no way was this game his fault.

Besides, if Favre is the QB in that game - he throws at least four picks once they were done 20+ points.
 
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

JMB said:
Spoken like a true Vikings fan (in other words, someone without a lot of common sense).

How about the other 40+ points Arizona scored? Ever think THOSE points might be more reflective of the game? Rodgers led the team to a great comeback in the second half. In no way was this game his fault.

Besides, if Favre is the QB in that game - he throws at least four picks once they were done 20+ points.
Click to expand...

You are of course ignoring that the reason they were behind to start with was partly Rodgers fault. ;)
 
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

Postgame show sucked balls. Cost 10 minutes of a Simpsons, which could have sucked anyways but it is better than the morons claiming that the best team in the playoffs was Dallas.

Seriously? Uh........... no.

They're probably the 3rd best NFC team still playing though. Only Arizona is below them but heck, Minnesota is better than them.

I hate Minnesota but they'll make Tony Romo cry next week. Count it.

Bolded to make note to JMB.

I can't stand Minnesota pro sports. Name a pro Minnesota sport... they all suck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JMB
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

JMB said:
Spoken like a true Vikings fan (in other words, someone without a lot of common sense).

How about the other 40+ points Arizona scored? Ever think THOSE points might be more reflective of the game? Rodgers led the team to a great comeback in the second half. In no way was this game his fault.

Besides, if Favre is the QB in that game - he throws at least four picks once they were done 20+ points.
Click to expand...

He's not a Vikings fan. I think he's a Packer fan but I'm not sure. He just likes to b^tch about every team and say how much they suck.
 
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

The refs missed the helmet lead on the holding call play and a facemask on the guy who hit Rodgers that would have negated the pick fumble I think, although the timing would have been close, but with the atrocious defense and Rogers' inability to deal with pressure, there's blame to go around on this stinker.
 
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

Dirty said:
He's not a Vikings fan. I think he's a Packer fan but I'm not sure. He just likes to b^tch about every team and say how much they suck.
Click to expand...

Fine. Spoken like a true Sioux fan. The rest still applies.

;)
 
Re: NFL 2009 Thread #3: The Quest for Perfection

I'm glad the Packers lost, partly because its always enjoyable, and partly because I'm not very optimistic about the Vikes and Packer fans would have been insufferable if they had been the team to knock us out... I meant MORE insufferable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top