Bought a three pack of movies at Wal-Mart for like 12 bucks a few weeks back. It contained Spaceballs, History of the World Pt 1, and Young Frankenstein.
You are wise in your generation.
Bought a three pack of movies at Wal-Mart for like 12 bucks a few weeks back. It contained Spaceballs, History of the World Pt 1, and Young Frankenstein.
Related to Western movie conversation, John Wayne sucks and is absurdly overrated.
Yup!
And the Inquistion Scene is better than any comedy period that has come out since then. Hell that scene alone is better than the combined careers of Will Farrell, David Spade and Chris Farley!
Yeah it seems in Hollywood the better you are early on the worse you are later. It is rather rare for an actor to have a steady arc that never falls over the edge. Jeff Bridges is one and Clint Eastwood has as well. (Kepler I know you hate Unforgiven but Gran Torino was excellent)
I'm about 20 minutes into 2001: A Space Odyssey. If this movie doesn't get any better within the next 20, it'll be 1/3 for Kubrick (among FMJ, Clockwork Orange, and 2001). God he's terribly overrated. Clockwork Orange was one of the most useless movies I have ever had the displeasure of watching.
I'll give the set designer of 2001 a lot of credit. Fantastic so far.
46 minutes in and we finally get a hint of a plot.
No, it's just demented. Now 2001 is simply relying on the same stupid camera trick to make people go "upside down" in lieu of producing an actual movie. "Hey everyone! Look! I'm brilliant!" is all I get from this movie.
Kubrick showed great restraint when turning it into a movie.
Thanks for the 20-minute long acid trip. This movie is terrible and Kubrick is a hack.
Just remember folks, he likes the wave at sporting events...
Kubrick is a legitimately great director. A Clockwork Orange and 2001 are both excellent movies if you buy what they're trying to do, otherwise of course you'll hate them. BTW, I hated 2001 until I was in my 40's -- it gets much better with repeated viewing (which is the mark of a good movie). Do not see it on a small screen. It's like Lawrence of Arabia -- it absolutely requires a movie theatre. Strangelove and Spartacus are balls to the wall great. I was completely bored by The Shining the first time I saw it, but the more I see it I more I love it (just ignore the kid and the mother and it's a good, albeit enormously overblown and self-important, movie). Stanley may have been losing it at the end -- Eyes Wide Shut is one of the worst ten movies I've ever seen, but that may also have been a cast beyond any hope.
I've been told the director of Full Metal Jacket was a hack.
2001 suffers from the idea that long and completely unnecessary scenes that last for tens of minutes are "brilliant". They aren't. It's terribly boring and in the end it hurt the movie IMHO.
The acid trip scene at the end I agree with you -- I think the excuse is sheer datedness, it really blew people's minds when it came out. Put it this way, you couldn't pay me to sit through a George Pal animated monster fight, but in their day they were considered amazing.
The long prologue scene is the one most people have a problem with. I really hated it the first time I saw it. Now I love it. But in a channel-surfer enivronment, it would be almost impossible to sit through if it was your first time seeing the movie. That's why I recommend seeing it as a captive audience. It has this problem: