... and if Matt feels so inclined, he can talk smack and call us names like TTT would.
Cornell earns a 2-0 victory in their first test this weekend against Harvard. Mazzotta played great in net, and it was all around one of Cornell's best defensive efforts this season. I would have liked to see more offense from Cornell (only took 14 shots on Harvard's goal), but Cornell seemed more content to focus on defense in this one.
It seemed that Cornell was really focusing on the defensive end of late based on scores, so the question people in Minnesota have in mind is what the blue blazes happened on Saturday? I get that BU has some amazing offensive talent, but they didn't exactly light it up against teams like Providence and UConn. Just a fluke game?The saying goes the Defense win championships, so IMHO their "Focus on defense" is the right approach.
Given that the WCHA referees assigned to work the previous two weekends have been Ludwig, Mendel, Lick and Lick, I'm guessing that is all we will see out of the WCHA crew this weekend. Should there be a UW vs UM meeting, then I'd expect an all-WCHA officiating crew. For anything else, it should be mixed or neutral.What's the protocol for officiating crews? Is there a mandatory mix of conference officials or merely arbitrary? Asking due to previous opinion that WCHA officials allow more physical play than their HE and ECAC counterparts. There are a few WCHA officials I would really rather not see working at AMSOIL.
There are a few WCHA officials I would really rather not see working at AMSOIL.
I don't think Cornell has done particularly well defensively against the better offensive teams it's played this year, with the exception of maybe the last Mercyhurst game. And BU surely was the most talented offensive team Cornell faced, so there was an adjustment. But Slobes posted a 25-save shutout in Game 2, so maybe there was an adjustment.It seemed that Cornell was really focusing on the defensive end of late based on scores, so the question people in Minnesota have in mind is what the blue blazes happened on Saturday? I get that BU has some amazing offensive talent, but they didn't exactly light it up against teams like Providence and UConn. Just a fluke game?
I was really hoping for a Cornell vs Minnesota championship game in 2010, but unfortunately, UMD messed that up.
It seemed that Cornell was really focusing on the defensive end of late based on scores, so the question people in Minnesota have in mind is what the blue blazes happened on Saturday? I get that BU has some amazing offensive talent, but they didn't exactly light it up against teams like Providence and UConn. Just a fluke game?
If looked at as a whole, I think 2010 was a better chance, in that all of the top teams in the WCHA were down that year. The big three had all been to the FF in Boston, but they all lost a ton, so Minnesota wound up leading the league for most of the season by default. It wasn't until Larocque came back and UMD got hot that the WCHA really had a championship-caliber team.I also agree with brookyone's point, that this Cornell team is probably the best positioned for a run of any ECAC team in the last several years, though the competition remains strong as well.
I get that BU has some amazing offensive talent, but they didn't exactly light it up against teams like Providence and UConn. Just a fluke game?
I usually never root for the rodents, but there seems to be this east/west thing in gal's hockey, and I'd like to see the west continue to win. Go Rodents.
The Cornell players probably started the game not quite focused enough on defense, which left Mazzotta a bit of a sitting duck. No goalie would likely look too sharp in that situation. Fortunately, they really tightened things down densively for most of the OTs.
I was really hoping for a Cornell vs Minnesota championship game in 2010, but unfortunately, UMD messed that up.
After the 2005 WCHA championship game, Johnson likely wouldn't agree with that.I've always been pretty content with the job Mendel does. I don't recall many games that he's really gotten himself into.
Not a fan of Elam. In poor condition and in the way and out of position a lot, then he tries to compensate by making calls on plays he didn't really see. I'd prefer Lund over him.The other two I think do a solid job usually are Joe Harris and Michael Elam.
Vetter, every year but her junior season.Correct me if I'm wrong ARM, but I don't remember many goalies on a run like this into the tournament.
I agree, especially compared to the 2004 team, where the third line just plain couldn't get out of their own zone for long stretches, and the blue line was 4 sophomores and a frosh, three of them on the small side. But up front, we had the big hammer, and they weren't afraid to lead.Top to bottom this is probably the hottest the Gophers have been getting to this point in the season and that includes the title runs with Darwitz and Wendell.
Thanks. I only saw BU goals 3 (has to be stopped) and 4 (not much of a chance for the goalie).The Cornell players probably started the game not quite focused enough on defense, which left Mazzotta a bit of a sitting duck. No goalie would likely look too sharp in that situation.
UND's coach had the same dilemma on Saturday: start the senior who has been #1 most of the year but was shaky in her previous outing, or the other goalie with better numbers. He started the senior, she gave up a goal on the first shot a minute and a half in, and he pulled her inside of 3 minutes gone without another SOG. So Derraugh could say, "You're starting Amanda, you're my girl," and whisper to Slebodnick, "Stay ready."I'll be interested to see who Derraugh starts on Friday. Mazzotta has been the number one goaltender when healthy this season, but Slebodnick came up big when needed most last saturday, and her stats speak for themselves.
I could buy that for PC, but UConn? No matter how familiar, BU should have been able to pull away from the Huskies a bit more.I think that the Hockey East team's familiarity with each other, combined with a very real parity from the top through fifth place this year, meant that all else equal (illness / injury) many of our teams had each other's numbers, so to speak.
A big weasel.What, technically, is a badger?
If Cornell isn't ready to play, at their best, from the tender on out at the first drop of the puck it will be a very, very long day for them. The Rodents have one of the fastest teams in the nation, if not THE fastest. No way Cornell can win a shoot-out type game against them. No way.