What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Movies 52 - 1917: Sonic the Bad Boys of Prey

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just because I can't find a better thread to put this in, went to the stage production of To Kill A Mockingbird yesterday that was created by Aaron Sorkin. Definitely had his touch all over it, both good and bad.

On the good front: the banter was witty, the deconstruction of the plot by interspersing the trial with other events worked very well, and the acting was top notch (bonus being the actress who played Scout in the film now plays Mrs. Dubois on the national tour). The guy who played Atticus really was top notch (though the part still showed it was clearly written for Jeff Daniels), could see why he had previously been nominated for a Tony and won an Emmy.

On the bad front: if you weren't a male, and preferably a white male, your part was cut way down or simply erased. Scout was reduced primarily to the narrator, Jem's part was expanded, and Dill became the comic relief. Calpurnia was reduced to a stereotypical sassy black woman. Tom Robinson's role expanded, though. Aunt Rachel was cut completely, Mrs. Dubois had about 2 minutes on stage, and Mayella Ewell became a caricature.

The what the fark parts: they cut one poignant scene and completely farked a couple of others, changing the entire tenor/ moral of the story. The one that really sticks out, though, is that instead of Atticus being spit on with no response as he keeps his cool and dignity, he now puts Bob Ewell in a headlock after losing himself for 30 seconds. Because Sorkin.
 
I watched the first two Michael Bay Transformers movies.

Cool explosions, shitty dialogue, and a story that made absolutely no sense.

Good Labor Day afternoon time waster.
 
I think I made it through half of one of those films...I can take a lot but that is too much Michael Bay for these eyes!
 
What, you all don't appreciate two and a half hour long General Motors adverisements?


*Edit* Every time I re-watch the first film and all the transformers meet up, i fully expect a cameo from Big & Rich...

https://youtu.be/ZGxei2GX97U
 
Last edited:
A German version of All Quiet on the Western Front hits Netflix on 10/28. It will be a must see for me.

The Lew Ayres version (1930) is my 2nd favorite anti-war movie with Paths of Glory being #1.
 
A German version of All Quiet on the Western Front hits Netflix on 10/28. It will be a must see for me.

The Lew Ayres version (1930) is my 2nd favorite anti-war movie with Paths of Glory being #1.

I have still never seen Paths of Glory, somehow. The Lew Ayres version is incredible. The classroom scenes (spectacular in the book) would be denounced by both parties if included in an American movie today, that is if they were permitted to be shown at all.


If in some smothering dreams, you too could pace

Behind the wagon that we flung him in,

And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,

His hanging face, like a devil’s sick of sin;

If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood

Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,

Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud

Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,—

My friend, you would not tell with such high zest

To children ardent for some desperate glory,

The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est

Pro patria mori.
 
Last edited:
There will be an Inside Out 2.

I want to give it a chance.

Same here. The original is excellent.

I think it will have good potential. It is a direct sequel to the first and will focus on Riley as a teen with apparently some new emotions making appearances. We saw the humorous potential during the end credits of the 1st when the emotions went haywire when she was around that boy. I'd love it if they have it where she starts to have similar feelings around a girl. Could be an excellent opportunity to explore that. And a big ol middle finger to the magats.
 
I think it will have good potential. It is a direct sequel to the first and will focus on Riley as a teen with apparently some new emotions making appearances. We saw the humorous potential during the end credits of the 1st when the emotions went haywire when she was around that boy. I'd love it if they have it where she starts to have similar feelings around a girl. Could be an excellent opportunity to explore that. And a big ol middle finger to the magats.

TBH, that would be tiresome. Much like movies about WHITES AND BLACKS JUST GETTING ALONG TOGETHER!!! in the 70s and 80s, there comes a point where being LGBTQ is checking another corporate #WeRaceAsOne box.

Now, make the little b-tch trans and I AM all on board. That actually puts some stakes into it, and risks their profit margin. And even better, it's trading female for male personal identity, which will make the Left freak out too since it subverts our hierarchy.

Don't give me interracial buddies. Give me a sexually-active interracial couple. In 1955.
 
Last edited:
TBH, that would be tiresome. Much like movies about WHITES AND BLACKS JUST GETTING ALONG TOGETHER!!! in the 70s and 80s, there comes a point where being LGBTQ is checking another corporate #WeRaceAsOne box.

Now, make the little b-tch trans and I AM all on board. That actually puts some stakes into it, and risks their profit margin. And even better, it's trading female for male personal identity, which will make the Left freak out too since it subverts our hierarchy.

Don't give me interracial buddies. Give me a sexually-active interracial couple. In 1955.

Given the push back they get for even suggesting that a character might be LGBTQ or having one as a very minor background character, I don't think you'll see Pixar going all they way to Trans for a main character and/or as a main plot (which honestly was going to be my first suggestion but knew that was even less likely to happen)
 
This is all true. It would be nice to have the truth that sexual preference comes from inside not outside underlined, particularly in a children's movie. So yes I can see it being helpful to kids, and that's reason enough to do it.

As for the dopes who scream, they do not matter. They are not a valid input into the discussion, either to engage with or even to troll. They are just kneejerk reactions of a ideological tripwire now, they aren't a considered human reaction.

Make Riley's love interest a conservative Christian girl who has to fight to shed her bullsh-t upbringing to be true to her real emotions inside. Have Jesus approve of her choice, thus resolving her tensions and bringing both her faith and her sexuality into harmony, leaving the bigots out of the sight and favor of God. Go big. Stab the Nazis from the front. Co-opt their fetish.
 
Last edited:
You think a company associated with Di$ney is going to do anything that will risk even $1? That is definitely a radical thought...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top