What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

MLB 2022: Playing Ball, But Is Anyone Still Watching?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I love how we've reached a point where it's acceptable for "Major" franchises to play out of "minor" facilities (A's and Coyotes).

Sonner or later this bubble is gonna burst.
 
Teams have played in smaller or worse environments before as part of expansion or relocation. The Titans/Oilers had a plan to play in Memphis for two years at the Liberty Bowl because it was a bigger stadium, but Memphis got such low attendance they played at Vanderbilt which only sat 40k for their second year before their stadium was built. The Pilots stadium was terrible their first season in Seattle (maybe not the best example since it played a part in their move to Milwaukee).

The Coyotes are an extreme case because that's a team that was kicked out of their stadium and is still staying in the same media market without a plan. The A’s are also a bit of an extreme example in that the move has been approved and the stadium plans are technically approved but there are a lot of fights coming, so at this point I’d say they still don’t have a concrete deal in place.


As an aside, I’ve seen a lot of talk of how it’s unfair to pull Oakland’s team away. And while the circumstances of how it’s happening is awful, if there’s a franchise that has to move, it’s the A’s. Their time in Oakland only just surpassed the time they were in Philly before moving to KC. Why not move the franchise that’s already moved twice before? It’s part of their lore now. Set the clock at 50 years and they can move from Vegas to Portland or Mexico City or whatever the new hot sports town will be in 2070.

And the ironic thing is they’re only in this position because they tried to help the Giants, who probably have the most “what ifs” for relocation of any MLB franchise. The two closest attempts were Toronto before the city of SF filed a restraining order to keep them and then the Blue Jays were awarded as an expansion franchise soon after. Later they had a deal signed to move to St Petersburg and the NL voted it down for whatever reason. So with Candlestick being awful, the A’s said the Giants could have San Jose for territory to help with a new stadium. Of course, SF ended up building downtown, but kept San Jose as part of their territorial rights, so when Oakland wanted to move there a few years back, the Giants nixed those plans claiming encroachment.
 
Why not move the franchise that’s already moved twice before? It’s part of their lore now. Set the clock at 50 years and they can move from Vegas to Portland or Mexico City or whatever the new hot sports town will be in 2070.

This is genuinely funny. :-)

The Athletic Wanderers.
 
This is genuinely funny. :-)

The Athletic Wanderers.

I saw someone on Reddit claim the Athletics should have to change their name because the A’s are Oakland’s franchise. C’mon now. It sucks they’re leaving but if the Athletics name belonged to stay anywhere it was Philadelphia where Connie Mack was the franchise until the last few years before they moved.
 
I saw someone on Reddit claim the Athletics should have to change their name because the A’s are Oakland’s franchise.

11853701_0.jpg


"If the King's English was good enough for Jesus Christ, it's good enough for the children of Texas!" -- Miriam A. Ferguson, Gov-TX, 1881
 
When the NY football Giants announced they were moving to the Meadowlands, NYC kicked them out of Yankee Stadium immediately. They had to play for two years at Yale.
Wasn’t it because Yankee Stadium was being rebuilt? Didn’t everyone, Yankees, Mets, Giants, Jets, play at Shea one year?
 
Wasn’t it because Yankee Stadium was being rebuilt? Didn’t everyone, Yankees, Mets, Giants, Jets, play at Shea one year?

A bit of both. Yankee stadium was to be closed for a couple of years, so the Giants were only going to be able to play there through’73, but I think NYC limited the Giants to just a few games there that season after the announcement was made.
 
The Giants played their games in Connecticut, at the Yale Bowl, in '73 and '74. After playing their first two games at Yankee Stadium they headed for Yale for the rest of the 1973 season, played all 7 home games there in 1974, and then shared Shea with the Mets and the Jets in 1975.
 
Let's just bring back the classic barnstorming teams from 100 years back, except the team is in MLB. No, I don't have any earthly idea how that would actually work in practice.

They could be the "home" team for every city without a team. They'd play 27 3-game home series each in a different city. Then every year the bottom 5 in attendance would be dropped and the next 5 added.

Are there 27 states without an MLB team? Restrict their games to those states.
 
The Yogi Berra documentary It Ain't Over is wonderful. I might be behind on it, but if you haven't seen it I highly recommend it.
 
If the rumors are to be believed, Ohtani is down to the Dodgers and Blue Jays and will decide by the end of the weekend.

SI repeated the Dodgers fan site post that Ohtani is going to Toronto; the RSN that owns the Blue Jays can afford Ohtani's $600M because they are dropping the NHL rights, which lose the equivalent.
 
more power to him but that is ****ing ridiculous

Agreed. Most dynamic player since Ruth, but it’ll be a year before he can be a pitcher, so there’s 70M year 1 for a DH. Though there are evidently unprecedented deferrals in the deal so it won’t truly be 70M in cash. But if this isn’t just a one-time deal for a once in a century player and ends up raising salaries across the board, that’s going to create an interesting economy for a league losing its RSNs by next year for half the league. Better hope fans love paying for direct streaming or those OTA ads cash in.
 
Agreed. Most dynamic player since Ruth, but it’ll be a year before he can be a pitcher, so there’s 70M year 1 for a DH. Though there are evidently unprecedented deferrals in the deal so it won’t truly be 70M in cash. But if this isn’t just a one-time deal for a once in a century player and ends up raising salaries across the board, that’s going to create an interesting economy for a league losing its RSNs by next year for half the league. Better hope fans love paying for direct streaming or those OTA ads cash in.

This comment makes me wonder what is gonna happen if a team truly does end up spending more than it brings in. Is it possible for a modern sports franchise to truly run itself out of business? I mean teams have been increasing their ability to print money, so where exactly is the ceiling?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top