What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

MLB 2020: A New Hope

Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

I like whatever keeps WC teams playing an elimination game/series in the first round. I like that winning a division gets you a breather, which puts more incentive there.
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

I like whatever keeps WC teams playing an elimination game/series in the first round. I like that winning a division gets you a breather, which puts more incentive there.

I wouldn't mind this scenario if winning a division was always an indication of a superior team. But with unbalanced schedules a 93 win WC team may be a better team than a 95 win Division winner.

I say eliminate divisions, play everybody an equal number of times, eliminate interleague play, and just pick the top whatever from each league for the postseason. Top 7 maybe, and number 1 gets a bye. That gets you an expanded playoff and gives real incentives to winning the most games. This after a 154 game regular season (play everyone 11 times). Oh and no expansion of teams. 30 is enough.
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

4 divisions of 4 in each league.
No interleague.
Balanced schedule.
Only division winners get in the playoffs.

If you want interest, make teams spend their money. We arent here to justify the pirates owners horrible spending by adding more playoff teams.
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

If I am made Dictator of Baseball:

(0) Split the leagues. The only contact between leagues will be the ASG and the WS. No interleague RS. Each league has full control over everything within their leagues including how they select their AS team and their WS nominee.

So, now I give the Dictatorship of the American League to somebody else.

As Dictator of the National League:

(1) RS 20 weeks from mid-April to mid-September: 2 off days per week and doubleheaders on Sundays, for 20 x 6 = 120 games
(2) Send the Brewers back to the American League, reducing the league to 14 teams (nothing personal)
(3) Two Divisions of 7 teams each: East (NY, Wsh, Phi, Pgh, Atl, Mia, Cin) and West (Az, StL, LA, SF, SD, Col, Chi)
(4) 13 games x 6 divisional opponents + 6 games x 7 non-divisional opponents
(5) Playoffs: 2 division winners and 2 wildcards; seeded by record, best of 7 league SF and F series
 
Last edited:
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

Random thought:

Does the emphasis on "specialty pitching" eventually become the reason MLB reduces the regular season?

Kep may be on to something with the mandatory off days. Your star pitchers have 30 gamedays in them between April and October. This is a good way to get those guys into a higher percentage of a team's games.
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

As the resident promoter of All Things Portland I do not recommend baseball in Portland. It isn't a baseball city. Portland is a soccer town in the summer and a hockey town in the winter (indeed Portland should have gotten the N instead of Seattle -- the comparative WHL support is far stronger for Portland, and we are farther from Vancouver).

Quite frankly Portlanders have better things to do in the summer than watch baseball. A domed stadium would be an eyesore and not fit in with the local ethos or culture. It's just a bad idea.

To me the obvious places for baseball are Las Vegas and Salt Lake City. Even Albuquerque before Portland. Phoenix is getting so huge a second team will eventually be viable (say, Tempe, or maybe Glendale though Glendale sucks).
I defer to you on this - I love Portland (though only spent one night there) and it always comes up in these discussions. I have zero strong feelings on it.


Kepler to Swansong: "Drop dead."
:cool:


Going back to the days of totally separate leagues is never going to happen, and frankly shouldn't. Different leagues with different rules makes sense when the quality of one team to the next is variable (European Soccer, for example, has a million teams and a million leagues of different qualities). But parity in American major league sports is such that players constantly bounce around and there's just no need for artificial boundaries anymore. MLB is, for the most part, bound in that 60-40 split where the crappier teams bottom out around .400 winning percentage and the better teams top out around .600 (please note I said "better" and "crappier", not "best" and "worst"). One set of rules for all 30/32 teams is ideal.
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

(2) Send the Brewers back to the American League, reducing the league to 14 teams (nothing personal)

Does this mean I can then be dictator of the AL? I move the Brewers back to the NL. :p
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

Trevor Bauer has some opinions...

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">🗣🗣PREACH!!!! Finally someone in the league actually caring about this stuff and speaking up about it. THANK YOU. <a href="https://twitter.com/BauerOutage?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BauerOutage</a> <a href="https://t.co/BjqUNRlLbC">pic.twitter.com/BjqUNRlLbC</a></p>— Jared Carrabis (@Jared_Carrabis) <a href="https://twitter.com/Jared_Carrabis/status/1227471775522529280?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 12, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

I always liked the idea of 150 games. Assuming 6 games/1 off per week that shrinks the season by 2 weeks, but neither the league nor the union will ever let that happen. They won't even allow double headers any longer, or on the rare occasion they do only with selling separate tickets to both games.
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

if there is one good byproduct of the steroid era, it's that season records don't mean a drop of cowdung. so there is no reason to worry about the impact of subtracting or adding games anymore. cut 'em to 150, or 154, or 140. if anyone yaps about lost revenue, just do like the redsox and double ticket prices. :)
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

if there is one good byproduct of the steroid era, it's that season records don't mean a drop of cowdung. so there is no reason to worry about the impact of subtracting or adding games anymore. cut 'em to 150, or 154, or 140. if anyone yaps about lost revenue, just do like the redsox and double ticket prices. :)

It was the Orioles who figured out the trick that you cut your seating in half to make your product higher value because of scarcity, and then you triple ticket prices. The Red Sox and Cubs lived on that model for decades. The Mets even figured it out and we're rock stupid.

So do the same thing for games. Instead of 160 have 120, a 25% reduction, and then hike all the prices -- ticket and concessions and parking -- by 50%.
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

Does this mean I can then be dictator of the AL? I move the Brewers back to the NL. :p

I'm dictator of the NL and we don't accept you.

If the AL doesn't want the Brewers then I guess they turn indy and become ASU.
 
Re: MLB 2020: A New Hope

I defer to you on this - I love Portland (though only spent one night there) and it always comes up in these discussions. I have zero strong feelings on it.

Portland is used by owners as a threat. It's never been a serious bid, which makes the 23 people in town who want baseball that much more pathetic.

If we ever do get a franchise I say we plop the stadium down right on top of Mt. Hood.
 
Back
Top