What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

We just had one hell of a downpour that lasted roughly 30 seconds. :D

I couldn't hear the TV.
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

There was about an inch on the ground at my house when I left this morning. It was all gone except for a couple small spots by the time I got home from work.

OMG!!! Are you ok? I hope you have lots of provisions man because seriously IT IS OVER!!!!

:D
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

The Weather Terrorists are getting dumber by the day!
They aren't getting dumber; their computer forecast models aren't performing as well as they were a couple months ago. Both the Presidents' Day storm and the monster in December were predicted well in advance thanks to those models. Unfortunately, since the (sort-of) transition to spring, the storm prediction has turned to ****.

In the case of this storm, the significant snow fell about 100-200 miles S / E of the twin cities (which basically lined up with what the European computer model predicted). Unfortunately, getting full access to that model data is apparently very expensive, so US meteorologists don't utilize it much (all of this is per Paul Douglas' blog on the strib site).
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

OMG!!! Are you ok? I hope you have lots of provisions man because seriously IT IS OVER!!!!

:D

I almost had to put the Jeep into 4WD to make it to work this morning. Thank goodness traffic was light going west and north on 394/494 respectively.

Going the other direction, it was a standstill. No, not kidding. And I commute around 9am, so usually no rush hour traffic either way. :rolleyes:
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

could get to 50 this weekend!!!!1 :D
Supposed to hit that today. Unfortunately, it's probably going to rain quite a bit over the next couple days. Things will improve Sunday (possibly 60!), but more rain is in the offing for Monday-Tuesday. Ugh.
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

Supposed to hit that today. Unfortunately, it's probably going to rain quite a bit over the next couple days. Things will improve Sunday (possibly 60!), but more rain is in the offing for Monday-Tuesday. Ugh.

I keep forgetting it's thursday, as it is my friday for the week.:p

I guess i'd rather have rain than snow, but this spring has been a miserable one so far..I'd love to get some good weather here and a have a few nights where I can fire up the grill, etc.
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

It hailed last night! :eek:


I am just happy it is sunny outside today.
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

this spring has been a miserable one so far..I'd love to get some good weather here and a have a few nights where I can fire up the grill, etc.
We should have expected a horrible spring given how good last year's was (no snow after March 1st, very little rain in the March-May period, and unusually warm weather throughout).
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

We should have expected a horrible spring given how good last year's was (no snow after March 1st, very little rain in the March-May period, and unusually warm weather throughout).

That is true. Maybe we just think this spring sucks so much when we were so spoiled last year. I think I was golfing outdoors the week after the Final Five last year even. Good News is, the weather can only get better...right?
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

That is true. Maybe we just think this spring sucks so much when we were so spoiled last year. I think I was golfing outdoors the week after the Final Five last year even. Good News is, the weather can only get better...right?
Last spring was the best one I've ever seen in MN, and I've been here my entire life. Simply put, we shouldn't expect another one like that for a long long time.

As for an expected improvement in weather: well, it's a wet pattern, so the only real improvement will be that it will get a bit warmer. We're still days or perhaps weeks away from a prolonged stretch of being able to go outside and enjoy it for more than a day or two at a time. :mad:
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

We should have expected a horrible spring given how good last year's was (no snow after March 1st, very little rain in the March-May period, and unusually warm weather throughout).
We were done planting corn at this time a year ago, which is so early, it was scary. We're still probably a week away from starting this year, if the rainy forecast holds true.
 
Last spring was the best one I've ever seen in MN, and I've been here my entire life. Simply put, we shouldn't expect another one like that for a long long time.

As for an expected improvement in weather: well, it's a wet pattern, so the only real improvement will be that it will get a bit warmer. We're still days or perhaps weeks away from a prolonged stretch of being able to go outside and enjoy it for more than a day or two at a time. :mad:

We shouldn't expect one for a long time..sounds like you should be paired with goldy and grey..;)
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

They aren't getting dumber; their computer forecast models aren't performing as well as they were a couple months ago. Both the Presidents' Day storm and the monster in December were predicted well in advance thanks to those models. Unfortunately, since the (sort-of) transition to spring, the storm prediction has turned to ****.

In the case of this storm, the significant snow fell about 100-200 miles S / E of the twin cities (which basically lined up with what the European computer model predicted). Unfortunately, getting full access to that model data is apparently very expensive, so US meteorologists don't utilize it much (all of this is per Paul Douglas' blog on the strib site).

Yay they got a couple right...for once. Dont pretend Paul Douglas and Co. dont get it wrong just as much as they do right. No one would care if they didnt make every snowfall (or rain storm) sound like the coming of the armaggeddon.

Not to mention, every year (for the most part) it snows in April (or May) and every year it is blown WAY out of proportion by the media and the people in this town.
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

Yay they got a couple right...for once.
Predicting snowfall amounts is extremely difficult. Even when they are right in predicting the arrival of a major storm in the area, they can still be wrong on the amount of snow that falls in a given area due to the often sharp cut-off in moisture over a relatively short distance. In the case of the December storm, while Minneapolis was crippled with nearly a foot and a half, just 70 miles to the NW, St. Cloud was barely impacted.
Dont pretend Paul Douglas and Co. dont get it wrong just as much as they do right.
On a 24 hour basis, weather forecasting is actually quite accurate. And his forecast snowfall total for the metro wasn't that bad for the last storm (a bit high, predicting 2-5"). The airport got just under 2", and Plymouth got 3". 1-2" was a fairly common total throughout the twin cities.
No one would care if they didnt make every snowfall (or rain storm) sound like the coming of the armaggeddon.
I don't get my weather info from the local TV stations, so I'm not paying any attention to their claims of the arrival of a level 5 kill storm. My two sources are Douglas' blog (which is quite good w/ regard to explaining the details of what it is they are looking at to come up with their forecasts) and the forecast discussions available on the NWS site. The best way to describe these sources relative to TV is that the local stations are a bit like Fox News / MSNBC while what I'm looking at is more along the lines of PBS/CSPAN. It's essentially the same forecast you're getting from the rest of the media, but it's without the hysteria and with more of an explanation / data analysis.
Not to mention, every year (for the most part) it snows in April (or May) and every year it is blown WAY out of proportion by the media and the people in this town.
I think part of it is a growing sensitivity to the problem of not predicting something and then having the metro area blindsided, thus producing a surprise impact on rush hour and p*ssing a lot of people off. If everyone is expecting something, and it doesn't happen, we might roll our eyes and post angry profane rants on message boards about idiotic meteorologists trying to rile us up for ratings. However, if we aren't expecting anything, and we're suddenly stuck in traffic on the commute from hell because of a massive deluge flooding out 494, then we're really p*ssed off because nobody warned us.
 
Re: Minnesotans arguing about the weather...

We should have expected a horrible spring given how good last year's was (no snow after March 1st, very little rain in the March-May period, and unusually warm weather throughout).

Isn't La Niña going? I heard that usually means a cold, wet spring in the Midwest.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top