Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

[Gurtholfin]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

I not big on repping, but how is he still green?


Also - where's Rink Pig? I'm actually starting to miss him in comparison. At least his banalities were occasionally funny.

 

[mariucci]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

I wasn't arguing with anyone when I posted what I did this morning. Just trying to have a little fun with this thread...that is all.

Yeah right.. Hope you dont think im buying that load.. I wasn't offended btw, bring your best is all I ask

 

[JDUBBS1280]

I wasn't arguing with anyone when I posted what I did this morning. Just trying to have a little fun with this thread...that is all.

And now you know what it's like when you aren't the only one part of a conversation that isn't appreciated, but are singled out by your fellow fans.

You wanted hockey talk, so talk about hockey.

 

[gopher wes]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

I think Wes is more interested in earning rube cred with Badger fans than he is in talking hockey.

Again, plenty of hockey related posts in the last few pages Wes, but look at what you chose to reply to.

Tool.

False, I hate sconnie fans almost as much as I hate sue fans. But most sconnie hockey fans are somewhat bearable because you can can laugh at them for not having any hockey knowledge. I couldn't care less what sconnie fans think of me. I just thought Chuck's post was funny, I replied to it in a joking way, and for some reason you took offense to it.

I have read all the hockey posts and, like I said before, my post didn't take away from those in any way so I'm not sure what you're getting at there.

 

[mariucci]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

I think the p1ssing contest in this thread has much more substance than the upcoming series will.

 

[Gurtholfin]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

I wasn't arguing with anyone when I posted what I did this morning. Just trying to have a little fun with this thread...that is all.

You can't win. I don't think he's slept this week as he's afraid someone might say something and he won't be there to respond.

These threads are meant to be fun and we all accuse each other and our respective fan bases of generalizations that we know to be untrue or at least too broad. Except of course for the deer thing. We ALL, every last red-blooded Wisconsinite, have a weakness for a cold, stiff, deer corpse.

The breakdown happens when you get people who take themselves too seriously and forget that life can be more fun when you can laugh at yourself as well as each other. Or, if there is a debate, agree at some point to disagree.

 

[mariucci]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

Well done Chuck

Link

http://www.gophersports.com/blog/2011/11/view-from-wisconsin-1.html

 

[JDUBBS1280]

False, I hate sconnie fans almost as much as I hate sue fans. But most sconnie hockey fans are somewhat bearable because you can can laugh at them for not having any hockey knowledge. I couldn't care less what sconnie fans think of me. I just thought Chuck's post was funny, I replied to it in a joking way, and for some reason you took offense to it.

I have read all the hockey posts and, like I said before, my post didn't take away from those in any way so I'm not sure what you're getting at there.

The point was, you got mad at us for getting drawn into a stupid debate with a troll, and then when things settled back down and talk shifted back to hockey, you piled back on.

You complained about there not being any hockey talk, but I don't see you talking about hockey.

Both of those things irk me.

 

[mariucci]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

You can't win. I don't think he's slept this week as he's afraid someone might say something and he won't be there to respond.

These threads are meant to be fun and we all accuse each other and our respective fan bases of generalizations that we know to be untrue or at least too broad. Except of course for the deer thing. We ALL, every last red-blooded Wisconsinite, have a weakness for a cold, stiff, deer corpse.

The breakdown happens when you get people who take themselves too seriously and forget that life can be more fun when you can laugh at yourself as well as each other. Or, if there is a debate, agree at some point to disagree.[/QUOTE]

Ummm Chippy did you really just say that? Consult your therapist immediately

 

[Chuck Schwartz]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

Well done Chuck

Link

http://www.gophersports.com/blog/2011/11/view-from-wisconsin-1.html

Thanks. People want to talk hockey, there's a conversation piece.

 

[gopher wes]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

You can't win. I don't think he's slept this week as he's afraid someone might say something and he won't be there to respond.

These threads are meant to be fun and we all accuse each other and our respective fan bases of generalizations that we know to be untrue or at least too broad. Except of course for the deer thing. We ALL, every last red-blooded Wisconsinite, have a weakness for a cold, stiff, deer corpse.

The breakdown happens when you get people who take themselves too seriously and forget that life can be more fun when you can laugh at yourself as well as each other. Or, if there is a debate, agree at some point to disagree.

I was under the impression that these deals were supposed to be fun as well. Maybe we are missing something. I better be careful talking to you though because it might be misconstrued as me trying to gain some rube cred with you bucky fans.

p.s. Was that repping comment directed toward me? Really?

 

[Gurtholfin]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

I was under the impression that these deals were supposed to be fun as well. Maybe we are missing something. I better be careful talking to you though because it might be misconstrued as me trying to gain some rube cred with you bucky fans.

p.s. Was that repping comment directed toward me? Really?

Of course not.

 

[gopher wes]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

The point was, you got mad at us for getting drawn into a stupid debate with a troll, and then when things settled back down and talk shifted back to hockey, you piled back on.

You complained about there not being any hockey talk, but I don't see you talking about hockey.

Both of those things irk me.

Ha! I piled nothing on, but if you think so then I will apologize. Will that make yo feel better?

 

[JDUBBS1280]

Thanks. People want to talk hockey, there's a conversation piece.

I think special teams will decide the weekend IMO. I know Badger fans hate being labeled as a trap team, but I wonder how much they will try and trap this weekend to put pressure on the Gopher's young defensive corp?

 

[Chuck Schwartz]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

I think special teams will decide the weekend IMO.

Will be huge, no doubt. Wisconsin has been atrocious on the penalty kill. That has to improve this weekend.

I think it will as well. Dahl and R. Little are really good at what they do on the PK...and this is probably the third weekend that Barnes and Zengerle are seeing PK action so they are starting to settle into the role.

 

[Gurtholfin]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

You can't win. I don't think he's slept this week as he's afraid someone might say something and he won't be there to respond.

These threads are meant to be fun and we all accuse each other and our respective fan bases of generalizations that we know to be untrue or at least too broad. Except of course for the deer thing. We ALL, every last red-blooded Wisconsinite, have a weakness for a cold, stiff, deer corpse.

The breakdown happens when you get people who take themselves too seriously and forget that life can be more fun when you can laugh at yourself as well as each other. Or, if there is a debate, agree at some point to disagree.[/QUOTE]

Ummm Chippy did you really just say that? Consult your therapist immediately

Ummm, looking back, my last comment on the issue (that shall remain nameless) that you and Dubber failed to convince me of was 11/8/11 at 3:54 PM. That's nearly 44 hours ago. I believe that I have agreed to disagree and let it go. It seems as though that is not enough for you two though as you continue to reference it.

 

[Happy]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

who's gonna get the last word in.. will it be....

WI?
MN?
The seasoned vet?
Or the.....

NOOB?

MN when the gophers sweep.

 

[JDUBBS1280]

Will be huge, no doubt. Wisconsin has been atrocious on the penalty kill. That has to improve this weekend.

I think it will as well. Dahl and R. Little are really good at what they do on the PK...and this is probably the third weekend that Barnes and Zengerle are seeing PK action so they are starting to settle into the role.

Gophers need to stay out of the box too. They have been taking too many ill-advised penalties so far this season and it has really disrupted their rhythm at times. They have a decisive edge in scoring depth IMO, and it's hard to take advantage of that when you're constantly killing penalties.

 

[Gurtholfin]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

Will be huge, no doubt. Wisconsin has been atrocious on the penalty kill. That has to improve this weekend.

I think it will as well. Dahl and R. Little are really good at what they do on the PK...and this is probably the third weekend that Barnes and Zengerle are seeing PK action so they are starting to settle into the role.

Hopefully, we'll see lots of this...

 

[mariucci]

Re: Minnesota @ Wisconsin: Secondary Rivalry, Just As Much Hatred

Ummm, looking back, my last comment on the issue (that shall remain nameless) that you and Dubber failed to convince me of was 11/8/11 at 3:54 PM. That's nearly 44 hours ago. I believe that I have agreed to disagree and let it go. It seems as though that is not enough for you two though as you continue to reference it.

Are you forgetting something intentionally?

I disagree to agree

I was just bustin' your balls chippy