Re: Minnesota Gophers 2012-2013 Part II: Mmmm, Iron City Beer!
No it's not.

. The '02 team didn't win the Broadmoor and neither did last season's FF team. And again they had 3 losses in their past 12 played including 5 wins in a row before playing a CC team that was far more desperate for a win. I swear this team could save a baby from a burning building and some fans would still ***** if they didn't also put out the fire.
Yes it is.

Among the 5 Ws, four (3 one goal games, 2 comeback wins) were against an 11th place team that only won 6 games all year and two of the most recent losses are shutouts. Not at all impressive for a #2 nationally ranked team.
If you extend your sample to 16 games, the Gophers are 9-5-2 (inc. WCHA playoffs and CC loss) compared with 13-3 ('02) and 11-5 ('12).
A reasonable comparison for defining "consistent" play going into the NCAA tournament is "teams swept/shutouts incurred" during the same 16 game period: 3/0 ('02), 3/0 ('12), 1/2 ('13). Total number of overall season sweeps in '02 and '12 is also negatively correlated as well: 7 ('02), 8 ('12), 4 ('13).
I'll use overall sweeps among WCHA national championship teams between 1999-2012 (DU, MN, UMD, UND and UW) as a performance metric to measure "consistency". Mean overall season sweeps for UND (2000), Gophers (2001-03), DU (2003-05), UW (2006), and UMD (2011) as NCAA national champs is 6.4 compared with the Gophers this season @ 4.
Thus, if the Gophers win a Natty they will be the anomaly in the above category among NCAA national champs from the WCHA over the last 14 years.
So the real question is: Can they even save the baby, unless they put out the fire?
Go Gophers!
