Re: Minnesota Gopher women's hockey off season thread for summer 2014
Both Jody Horak and Noora Räty performed markedly better in the NCAA tournament as juniors than they had as underclassmen. The result for each was her first championship. Was the problem fatigue? Because of the Olympics and multiple OTs, that was definitely an issue in 2010, but I think that having experienced the NCAA Tournament previously makes a difference as well. Leveille had at least three games during the season versus Wisconsin where she performed better than she did versus the Badgers in the Frozen Four. Was it mental and physical fatigue, inexperience, improvement by Bucky, shakier play by teammates? Maybe some of each. From 2006-2010, the Gophers lost four times in the NCAAs starting a different freshman goaltender in each. There have been goalies that did well w/o NCAA experience (Vetter, Harss, Rigsby), but there hasn't really been an example for the Gophers.
The goalie doesn't have to necessarily be incredible. I think both Horak and Räty carried the team a bit more as juniors than seniors, but it is hard to lose a goaltending battle and still win the game.
I agree, and it could be a little of each. However …..
When the discussion was which goalie deserved to be nominated for the PK, (and there was also a goalie thread) where a few people that said Leveille didn’t deserve it, since she had the best team in front of her and consequently the easiest job during the season.
I disagree, and would argue she had the most difficult job, perhaps in all of hockey. What other goalie had to go such long stretches without any action? The other teams often carried the puck into the zone many times before getting a shot on goal. Each time she’d have to be both mentally and physically ready to make the play. But nothing happened.
Ever hear of stimulus-response? Or Chicken Little? If this happens often enough, eventually it takes its toll. I recall in 2012/13 there were a couple games I didn’t think Räty looked as sharp as she normally was and thinking “Wow, if she plays like this in the NCAA tournament, the Gophers could be in trouble”. When you play the best teams in the country, your goalie better be at the top of her game. But Räty was relieved a couple times in the 3rd period with the Gophers safely in the lead. and also for a couple games. Each time she came back and looked as good as ever, maybe even better. Good player management, coincidence, or was it just my imagination?
The record books show that after the last time she sat out a game she came back to pitch 6 consecutive shutouts, but more importantly she won two overtime games in the NCAA tournament. IOW, when her team needed her the most, she was impenetrable.
If it’s a good idea for the best female goalie in the world to sit out a period or a game, wouldn’t you think it might be a good idea for a rookie goalie too?
The assumption is that Peters will get more minutes than Sletta did.
IMO, I don’t think it has anything to do with Sletta/Peters.
I know she hasn’t played much, but it always looked to me like Sletta was reacting well to the play and seemed to have good concentration, in short a capable goalie, and history shows she has been.
Two of the last three years she was the only backup available. If she wasn’t/isn’t capable, what is she doing on the team? She subbed for Räty as a freshman over twice as many minutes as for Leveille as a Junior. You’d think she would have played more minutes last year than as a freshman.
Yes, hindsight is 20/20, but still…
You're making even less sense than usual though I guess not being able to figure out what you intended to mean is a sort of improvement.
an improvement for you ?
considering what a detailed orientated person you are, I pretty much expected a response from you.