What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

Seriously...you're going to blame the refs? Just because you have a good powerplay that's justification for calling more penalties? Jeez...

I didn't blame the refs. I said what happened. Missed calls. Again. In an NCAA Tournament game. Shocker. They missed calls on your end, too. Their refusal to call interference either way was laughable.

That wasn't what lost Michigan the game, though. Turning the puck over a million times did. The only hope of covering up those mistakes was going on the powerplay, and Michigan was on it once all weekend. So naturally I'm going to bring it up.

But there's no guarantee Michigan would've went 3-for-3 on it, so much of the OP was sour grapes.
 
Last edited:
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

They missed calls on your end, too.

Not "my" end. I'm a BU fan...we were in a different regional. I'm just commenting on your statement...going down the "officiating" rathole won't get you anywhere. But, since you brought it up, North Dakota was better. Period.
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

Not "my" end. I'm a BU fan...we were in a different regional. I'm just commenting on your statement...going down the "officiating" rathole won't get you anywhere. But, since you brought it up, North Dakota was better. Period.

I'm not arguing that they played better.
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

Hmm, well that explains how UND was able to beat a vastly superior team today. The refs, as they are so often known to do, had it out for Michigan. I just knew someone would have the answer. Thanks.
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

While the reffing certainly wasn't the best, it certainly wasn't biased against michigan. For every uncalled interference on UND there was two on mich. Plus michigan was the recipient of a blatant make-up call. Remember, refs screw over UND, not their opponents...
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

Maybe I'm in the minority but overall compared to the other regional games, I actually liked the ECAC officiating that did both UND games this weekend. They really let both teams play. They could've made the ticky tacky calls but they let the teams play the game and decide the ending.
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

While the reffing certainly wasn't the best, it certainly wasn't biased against michigan. For every uncalled interference on UND there was two on mich. Plus michigan was the recipient of a blatant make-up call. Remember, refs screw over UND, not their opponents...

I think what the poster was going for was that the only way Michigan was going to beat North Dakota was if the refs called everything. Even if Michigan only got 10 powerplays to North Dakota's 20, the Wolverines may have been able to outscore North Dakota, who struggled with the man advantage. That may have been true, as North Dakota dominated Michigan 5x5, and both of Michigan's goals were essentially on the powerplay (the first coming 11 seconds after Michigan's abbreviated powerplay and while still controlling the zone). Fortunately, we will never know.
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

I think what the poster was going for was that the only way Michigan was going to beat North Dakota was if the refs called everything. Even if Michigan only got 10 powerplays to North Dakota's 20, the Wolverines may have been able to outscore North Dakota, who struggled with the man advantage. That may have been true, as North Dakota dominated Michigan 5x5, and both of Michigan's goals were essentially on the powerplay (the first coming 11 seconds after Michigan's abbreviated powerplay and while still controlling the zone). Fortunately, we will never know.

I agree with everything you said basically but him bringing up the refs really smelled like sour grapes... and I wasn't the only one to smell it. There were a ton of mich fans on twitter claiming their team was screwed by the refs. That was not the case today.
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

Not "my" end. I'm a BU fan...we were in a different regional. I'm just commenting on your statement...going down the "officiating" rathole won't get you anywhere. But, since you brought it up, North Dakota was better. Period.

Concur 100% on UND being better, except on PP.

While the reffing certainly wasn't the best, it certainly wasn't biased against michigan. For every uncalled interference on UND there was two on mich. Plus michigan was the recipient of a blatant make-up call. Remember, refs screw over UND, not their opponents...

I don't think he was saying they were biased against Michigan in the game. As for non-calls in the UND vs UM game, I don't see any reason in arguing over it as the point isn't that Michigan didn't get calls but that the refs were not calling many penalties in either of Michigan's games on either team. Agree with this or not, that is a fact.

At the end of the day, UND and ND both played very disciplined games (or at least disciplined enough according to the refs and that is what matters). Come the NCAA tournament, that is what good teams do. They take away strengths of other teams, in the case of Michigan that is the PP. ND tried and it wasn't enough. UND mostly did and succeeded.
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

I agree with everything you said basically but him bringing up the refs really smelled like sour grapes... and I wasn't the only one to smell it. There were a ton of mich fans on twitter claiming their team was screwed by the refs. That was not the case today.

It's hard to admit your team got smoked by a better opponent...especially when your team really hadn't had to play against anyone who actually plays defense. Perhaps that's the issue for Michigan fans. They are confusing playing defense with penalties? :p:D:D
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

UND's Heavy Line of Johnson, Gardner, and Poganski held their CCM line to a minus 7 rating while they themselves had a combined 2 goals 1 assist and a plus 5 rating. Very impressive. That was the difference among that they just simply outworked the ugly helmets lines 1 thru 4.
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

UND's Heavy Line of Johnson, Gardner, and Poganski held their CCM line to a minus 7 rating while they themselves had a combined 2 goals 1 assist and a plus 5 rating. Very impressive. That was the difference among that they just simply outworked the ugly helmets lines 1 thru 4.

That can't be right. The three Hobey finalists were a combined minus 7? Are you sure your calculator isn't broken? That's the only rationale explanation.
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

That can't be right. The three Hobey finalists were a combined minus 7? Are you sure your calculator isn't broken? That's the only rationale explanation.

Well, Dirty, they are included in this year's special category dubbed the "Power Play Hobey." It's for players who are good at the power play and nothing else. They don't have to wear pads or set foot inside the defensive zone unless they are bored and want to create a turnover.
 
Last edited:
I thought it was a great game, refs had nothing to with outcome. UND controlled the game especially after Michigan scored. Michigan was good, No Dakota better
 
It's Fighting Hawks.

{sigh}

I voted for the UND Fighting Upper Plains Redskins, or Fighting Redskins for short. Apparently Redskins is a more acceptable moniker. In fact, I think the NCAA should change all Native American mascots to the Redskins.
 
Last edited:
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

I didn't blame the refs. I said what happened. Missed calls. Again. In an NCAA Tournament game. Shocker. They missed calls on your end, too. Their refusal to call interference either way was laughable.

That wasn't what lost Michigan the game, though. Turning the puck over a million times did. The only hope of covering up those mistakes was going on the powerplay, and Michigan was on it once all weekend. So naturally I'm going to bring it up.

But there's no guarantee Michigan would've went 3-for-3 on it, so much of the OP was sour grapes.

It's always rich when UM fan starts whining about poor officiating. Michigan for decades lived off biased officiating in the CCHA. Officials conveniently missing late punches or slashes.

I'd just shut up if I were you.
 
Re: Midwest regional: Notre dame vs Umich, UND vs Northeastern

Two things that plagued the team all year long--turnovers and terrible refs--combined for some kind of evil cuisine to ruin this one.

This is what happens when you play in the JV of Division 1. You hadn't played a decent team all season, really, and once you finally ran into a real opponent, you pi55ed your shorts and cried for your mothers. You justly deserved Saturday's loss. Your league is a joke.
 
I thought it was a great game, refs had nothing to with outcome. UND controlled the game especially after Michigan scored. Michigan was good, No Dakota better

My team also got smoked by the Sioux in a game worked by the same ECAC crew and none of us are whining about it. Really, the sense of entitlement shown by many of the Michigan people was mind boggling.

The better team beat NU, then Michigan. Officials had nothing to do with either result.
 
Back
Top