FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
Oh, I have little doubt of that.
Oh, I have little doubt of that.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
- Thread starter FadeToBlack&Gold
- Start date
Wasn't inviting the opposing coach to speak just a courtesy by Russell? Even if Pearson continues it, perhaps the future NCHC coaches won't get invited or (more likely) will decline, just because of yayhoos like you guys.
I still think sitting behind the bench and giving that asshat an earful will be enjoyable
Shirtless Guy
Old Dirty Basterd
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
yayhoos? At the blueline luncheon, I'd keep it calm and direct.Wasn't inviting the opposing coach to speak just a courtesy by Russell? Even if Pearson continues it, perhaps the future NCHC coaches won't get invited or (more likely) will decline, just because of yayhoos like you guys.
bigblue_dl
Armed
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
**** that. I'm throwing mashed potatoes at that ********.
JohnsonsJerseys
Michigan Tech Fan
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
Well if Western was looking to spend more money on their hockey program, they're certainly going to be doing that in the NaCHo... on travel.
Denver = Flight
Colorado = Flight
tDuluth = Flight
Omaha = Flight
North Dakota = Flight
St Cloud State = Flight
Miami (OH) = BUS! Yeaah!
Sure the NaCHo needed more teams, but I'm STILL asking "Why Western?"
Ryan J
Well if Western was looking to spend more money on their hockey program, they're certainly going to be doing that in the NaCHo... on travel.
Denver = Flight
Colorado = Flight
tDuluth = Flight
Omaha = Flight
North Dakota = Flight
St Cloud State = Flight
Miami (OH) = BUS! Yeaah!
Sure the NaCHo needed more teams, but I'm STILL asking "Why Western?"
Ryan J
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
Because Western said "yes."
Because Western said "yes."
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
Why Western? It doesn't snow 200" a season in KZoo, and Gwoz is a puss in his old age.
Why Western? It doesn't snow 200" a season in KZoo, and Gwoz is a puss in his old age.
JOHN SCOTT ROCKS
Registered User
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
Hopefully, with the current coaching staff's very strong ties to the UM and state, the GLI stays intact and tech's exposure increases by being on the big ten network once or twice a year; maybe additional non-conf games may be possible with either of the teams but not counting on it at this point. Would not expect to see NCHC teams invited to the GLI anytime soon; who's currently scheduled? Maybe other big 10 and eastern schools will start taking up the fourth spot.
St. Cloud scheduled for 2012...
Hopefully, with the current coaching staff's very strong ties to the UM and state, the GLI stays intact and tech's exposure increases by being on the big ten network once or twice a year; maybe additional non-conf games may be possible with either of the teams but not counting on it at this point. Would not expect to see NCHC teams invited to the GLI anytime soon; who's currently scheduled? Maybe other big 10 and eastern schools will start taking up the fourth spot.
St. Cloud scheduled for 2012...
Last edited:
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
Agreed. I must admit I'm really glad we have Mel for this ****. We'd have be really really screwed otherwise.
Edit: I can say asshat, but not dam med? ***?
Agreed. I must admit I'm really glad we have Mel for this ****. We'd have be really really screwed otherwise.
Edit: I can say asshat, but not dam med? ***?
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
You can still say cum-guzzling hooker, though.
You can still say cum-guzzling hooker, though.
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
LOL. It's like Craig Ferguson learning he could say dry-hump on tv the other week. lol
LOL. It's like Craig Ferguson learning he could say dry-hump on tv the other week. lol
mtu_huskies
New member
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
Is anyone going to meet the coaches on Monday that could post a summary on here?
Is anyone going to meet the coaches on Monday that could post a summary on here?
JOHN SCOTT ROCKS
Registered User
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
While it used to bother me when the top end kids chose MJ over NCAA, it now amuses me for non other than to make the so called "elite" NCAA programs face the fact that they are not (a good portion of) the top players first choice. So while everyone thinks that the new conferences are going to have a major effect on recruiting, if the top end kids continue as a majority to chose MJ, IMO the hierarchy in college hockey talent is not going to be of the same magnitude from top to bottom as in college football or basketball where NCAA is the only option. Factor in that the NCAA hockey format is completely different than basketball, that MTU's chances of an autobid for winning the conference tourney will increase significantly, and that with a two game winning streak you can make the final four, I just don't see much for negatives in this whole realignment for MTU beside the loss of the WCHA final five $$'s which were probably disappearing with UMINN and UW leaving anyway.
While it used to bother me when the top end kids chose MJ over NCAA, it now amuses me for non other than to make the so called "elite" NCAA programs face the fact that they are not (a good portion of) the top players first choice. So while everyone thinks that the new conferences are going to have a major effect on recruiting, if the top end kids continue as a majority to chose MJ, IMO the hierarchy in college hockey talent is not going to be of the same magnitude from top to bottom as in college football or basketball where NCAA is the only option. Factor in that the NCAA hockey format is completely different than basketball, that MTU's chances of an autobid for winning the conference tourney will increase significantly, and that with a two game winning streak you can make the final four, I just don't see much for negatives in this whole realignment for MTU beside the loss of the WCHA final five $$'s which were probably disappearing with UMINN and UW leaving anyway.
Beer Pong Horn
soldier of fortune
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
Hell, Tech and Northern will probably be the perma-hosts of the WCHA tournament at the Resch anyway.
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
I highly doubt you'll see me at the F5 anymore. Houghton is a maybe, depending on the group headed up there. If it's not MN, it better be a decent opponent (read: opponent that I wouldn't see elsewhere like AIC, or a hated opponent like UND or WI) or MTU fanbase headed there.
I highly doubt you'll see me at the F5 anymore. Houghton is a maybe, depending on the group headed up there. If it's not MN, it better be a decent opponent (read: opponent that I wouldn't see elsewhere like AIC, or a hated opponent like UND or WI) or MTU fanbase headed there.
Beer Pong Horn
soldier of fortune
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
I highly doubt we'll see anyone at the F5 anymore.
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
Truth. That means in the next year or two, someone has to go to jail for something. Might as well go out with a bang!
NOT IT!
I highly doubt we'll see anyone at the F5 anymore.
Truth. That means in the next year or two, someone has to go to jail for something. Might as well go out with a bang!
NOT IT!
huskyfan
New member
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
no, having the coaches speak was going in the Watter's years. Russell actually shut it down a few years ago. perhaps they were overhearing our super secret gameday strategy ...
Wasn't inviting the opposing coach to speak just a courtesy by Russell? Even if Pearson continues it, perhaps the future NCHC coaches won't get invited or (more likely) will decline, just because of yayhoos like you guys.
no, having the coaches speak was going in the Watter's years. Russell actually shut it down a few years ago. perhaps they were overhearing our super secret gameday strategy ...
huskyfan
New member
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
he won't. he didn't show up even when he was invited.
he won't. he didn't show up even when he was invited.
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason III: Two Years To Prove It Can Be Done
I'm almost postive I remember seeing him at one when I was in school...
I didn't know they had stopped coming, I always thought it was cool that they did. But I've not been to one since I've been living in this evil state.
I'm almost postive I remember seeing him at one when I was in school...
I didn't know they had stopped coming, I always thought it was cool that they did. But I've not been to one since I've been living in this evil state.