Re: Merrimack Offseason: ya, so that was fun.........
I certainly didn't expect home ice when the season started, but down the stretch I honestly thought they had a shot at #2 or even a first place tie. I thought they were as good as BC, and I thought they were clearly better than both BU and UNH. When the chips were down they only proved one of those assertions directly, and another one indirectly, but if they had been a bit more fastidious against some of the lower-ranked teams, like UML and PC, they could have finished higher.
Still they made it to the finals, so I suppose that's irrelevant.
I agree with you-- it's going to be hard to duplicate this year's result. At best, I think they may exchange Da Costa's playmaking with Myers' sniping, if he adjusts well to the college game, but it may mean having to have two lines that can play like the Madsen-Sheen-Flanigan line instead of one, and no finesse line like they had with SDC.
Also, despite the constant praise, Cannata I think needs to improve. Perhaps we saw the downside to his unflappability in the postseason? Or were the soft goals really just freak occurrences?
I like the enthusiasm, but I'm not sure about home ice and an NCAA bid. I think over the next five years, we will find out what a special group of players this 10-11 class was. I think home ice is a nice goal, but I will be honest that I really don't expect it. We still have a strong core of players returning (so far) but I feel like this would have to be one very productive freshman class for us to have similar success on 11-12.
Perhaps I will eat my own words a year from now, but I just feel like this season was so special that it will be tough to duplicate...
I certainly didn't expect home ice when the season started, but down the stretch I honestly thought they had a shot at #2 or even a first place tie. I thought they were as good as BC, and I thought they were clearly better than both BU and UNH. When the chips were down they only proved one of those assertions directly, and another one indirectly, but if they had been a bit more fastidious against some of the lower-ranked teams, like UML and PC, they could have finished higher.
Still they made it to the finals, so I suppose that's irrelevant.
I agree with you-- it's going to be hard to duplicate this year's result. At best, I think they may exchange Da Costa's playmaking with Myers' sniping, if he adjusts well to the college game, but it may mean having to have two lines that can play like the Madsen-Sheen-Flanigan line instead of one, and no finesse line like they had with SDC.
Also, despite the constant praise, Cannata I think needs to improve. Perhaps we saw the downside to his unflappability in the postseason? Or were the soft goals really just freak occurrences?