Re: Maine 2012 - Take 2. If This Ain't the Bottom...
Any mention of the guys' GPAs and upstanding lack of criminal behavior, etc. is either embarrassingly naive or outright disingenuous...
Let's all get real about how this stuff works!
To people who run an educational institution it matters just a tad. It isn't about what you or any other fan wants. It's about what Paul Ferguson expects from student-athletes. I'm going to guess his expectations don't align with yours.
However, I did run into Steve Abbott at the game Saturday night and from what little was said, it seems to me he is gathering ammunition to try to justify replacing TW at the end of the year. I realize to all you "fans" of the program it's a simple matter of wins and losses, but to school administrators it's a little more than that. Ridicule kids getting solid GPAs all you want, but to people running a
school those things do matter. Abbott and Ferguson also have to walk a fine line and not p
!ss off the wrong donors. While we're "getting real" let's be honest about the fact that all you in the Fire Whitehead brigade aren't going to contribute even a fraction of what these donors give to the university. As has been said several times, Abbott is a politician first and foremost. If he feels he has enough to make his case to the boosters after the season he will pull the trigger; if not TW serves out his contract - may even get an extension so the school doesn't have a "lame duck" coach. I would point out that writing a letter to Abbott, spelling out what you believe TW's shortcomings are and why you are no longer supporting the team would help his case, but we all know none of you will actually sign your real name to anything.
That's my take based on what was said. Of course, he is a politician so he could be saying one thing while doing another. Or he may decide he doesn't have enough to warrant going to the boosters; or the boosters could back TW anyway. There's also the fact that his position as AD is up on June 1, 2013 so he may feel no need to do anything and let his successor deal with it. It may just be idle speculation on my part, but that seems to be the way things are done around here now. For example, posting that families and alumni are being charged $20/game to go into the lounge after games - that was a total lie (I know because I asked) but it didn't stop anyone from spreading lies around the Internet...
Oh, and for all those expecting budget cuts to the hockey program: the only season 2003-2010 the football program turned a profit was 2006. Since then they have bled the university for $2.7M while expenses have increased to $3.5M/year. If cuts need to be made, it appears there are better targets than the hockey program.