Re: Illegal Immigration Pt. III: It's Illegal to be Illegal? Really?
Dunno. They kind of are defining. Again just having 25% or so disapproving of performance really is extremely low by any standard. And what makes these numbers even more dramatic is that they're going against a huge headwind of the clear perspective we had by 2008 of just what kind of spending just happened and widespread general sentiment against Bush.
There was absolutely huge concern. But self proclaimed fiscal conservatives still overwhelmingly supported Bush. That's the problem we're talking about here. Its not a sign that these 'fiscal conservatives' were somehow not represented in the numbers, because the numbers are there. Its a sign that they are willing to drop their self proclaimed number one priority...and in the case of supporting Bush, very quickly and without much merit.
The poll is from 2008...and when the economy was relatively fine. Again, a driving reason for an increased deficit today is stimulating the economy (many of the brightest economic minds out there believe this is a key to fixing the economy). Spending until 2008? No good reason.
Those are interesting numbers, no doubt about it. What I'd say it tells you though is that there's a lot of people out there who are casual fiscal conservatives, that claim the mantle when asked if they are by a poll, but aren't in a meaningful way. I'm sure if you lined up all the general conservatives, they'd all say they were fiscal conservatives also, although of course the level of interest/commitment many of them have to push fiscal conservancy is minimal at best. So, interesting numbers, but they aren't exactly defining.
Dunno. They kind of are defining. Again just having 25% or so disapproving of performance really is extremely low by any standard. And what makes these numbers even more dramatic is that they're going against a huge headwind of the clear perspective we had by 2008 of just what kind of spending just happened and widespread general sentiment against Bush.
And if you look at the underlying ABC story, it shows widespread concern about spending/deficits. If there was widespread concern, it's illogical to think that somehow fiscal conservatives weren't a part of that widespread concern, let alone probably leading the charge.
There was absolutely huge concern. But self proclaimed fiscal conservatives still overwhelmingly supported Bush. That's the problem we're talking about here. Its not a sign that these 'fiscal conservatives' were somehow not represented in the numbers, because the numbers are there. Its a sign that they are willing to drop their self proclaimed number one priority...and in the case of supporting Bush, very quickly and without much merit.
It's also illogical to expect "fiscal conservatism" to have been a primary concern of conservatives in 2002 or 2004.
The poll is from 2008...and when the economy was relatively fine. Again, a driving reason for an increased deficit today is stimulating the economy (many of the brightest economic minds out there believe this is a key to fixing the economy). Spending until 2008? No good reason.
Last edited: