What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

Did I hear the announcer right that Lowell is only running three lines tonight due to injury? Might make a difference later in the game.

Another night of UNH unable to get anything established in Lowell's zone. Going to have to rely on the PP or rushes. On that end, they do seem to be clearing the zone a bit better tonight.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

And now UML takes a lead, scoring two goals on consecutive SOG, including the first shot of the second period. Mental toughness time for UNH...
 
Dan said:
And now UML takes a lead, scoring two goals on consecutive SOG, including the first shot of the second period. Mental toughness time for UNH...
Click to expand...

3-1. Game is getting really chippy and Lowell dominating even-strength action
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

Don't think we showed up tonight....nice cross check to the head Kapla. At least we are still in it.
 
Last edited:
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

So did anyone at all see the play that got Soup tossed?

On ice officials certainly didn't and nobody I spoke to at arena did


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

Go-UML said:
So did anyone at all see the play that got Soup tossed?

On ice officials certainly didn't and nobody I spoke to at arena did


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I think my wife may have been the only one. When the refs were conferring, I asked what was going on. She said she thinks it had to do with that Lowell kid who hit the other kid in the head.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

BostonSoccerDad said:
I think my wife may have been the only one. When the refs were conferring, I asked what was going on. She said she thinks it had to do with that Lowell kid who hit the other kid in the head.
Click to expand...

I didn't see it but someone near me said it looked like Campbell caught the Wildcat player with a shoulder to the head. Play continued for a couple of minutes before they reviewed it. I wonder if Umile asked for the review as nothing was being called on the ice. It couldn't have been too obvious as the review seemed to take forever. Campbell only received a game misconduct so he'll be available tomorrow.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

boblav1 said:
I didn't see it but someone near me said it looked like Campbell caught the Wildcat player with a shoulder to the head. Play continued for a couple of minutes before they reviewed it. I wonder if Umile asked for the review as nothing was being called on the ice. It couldn't have been too obvious as the review seemed to take forever. Campbell only received a game misconduct so he'll be available tomorrow.
Click to expand...

I thought they were only allowed to review penalties if a penalty was already called and they were trying to decide if it was worth a major. As far as anyone anywhere near me could tell, no penalty was called during play.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

tape said:
I thought they were only allowed to review penalties if a penalty was already called and they were trying to decide if it was worth a major. As far as anyone anywhere near me could tell, no penalty was called during play.
Click to expand...

I thought the same thing and I agree nothing was being called during play. At this point I'm not sure what can or can not be reviewed. Norm wasn't happy with that call.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

All in all, terrific crowd last night. Great atmosphere for the game unlike Friday night. UNH supporters were represented in good numbers. Hope to see a similar crowd today.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

boblav1 said:
I thought the same thing and I agree nothing was being called during play. At this point I'm not sure what can or can not be reviewed. Norm wasn't happy with that call.
Click to expand...

Why do we even have on ice officials? So many of their calls are reviewed anyway. All the goals have to get the okay from
an off ice official before play can resume. What were they looking at when Lowell scored their 2nd goal. It could not have
been goaltender interference when the UML player was not even near the crease. All these reviews take away from the game
and need to be reduced.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

tape said:
I thought they were only allowed to review penalties if a penalty was already called and they were trying to decide if it was worth a major. As far as anyone anywhere near me could tell, no penalty was called during play.
Click to expand...
I think a lot of long-time college hockey fans are similarly scratching their heads on this one. To have it take that long and it end up in an ejection seems to be a rather nasty miscarriage of justice. I'm glad it didn't have too much of an effect on the game and that Soup is back tonight.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

gochiefs said:
What were they looking at when Lowell scored their 2nd goal. It could not have
been goaltender interference when the UML player was not even near the crease. All these reviews take away from the game
and need to be reduced.
Click to expand...
The only thing we could think of was a possible offsides?
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

boblav1 said:
The only thing we could think of was a possible offsides?
Click to expand...
That's what I was thinking. A few minutes prior, the person next to me had mentioned that Chanter got up slowly in the corner, but didn't see what happened. Ridiculous. The officials never recovered in the home crowd's mind, justifiably so.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

Sorry Lowell fans but UNH has picked up a lot of support for game 3. BC fans. Why? Because a BC win over Notre Dame rather than BU in the semifinals gives them a great chance for an a large NCAA bid should BC lose in the championship game due to flipping a PWR comparison with Notre Dame. If BC plays BU they may need to win Hockey East to get in.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

gochiefs said:
Why do we even have on ice officials? So many of their calls are reviewed anyway. All the goals have to get the okay from
an off ice official before play can resume. What were they looking at when Lowell scored their 2nd goal. It could not have
been goaltender interference when the UML player was not even near the crease. All these reviews take away from the game
and need to be reduced.
Click to expand...

Thank you!
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

BC/HE said:
Sorry Lowell fans but UNH has picked up a lot of support for game 3. BC fans. Why? Because a BC win over Notre Dame rather than BU in the semifinals gives them a great chance for an a large NCAA bid should BC lose in the championship game due to flipping a PWR comparison with Notre Dame. If BC plays BU they may need to win Hockey East to get in.
Click to expand...

That's ok. If Lowell wins, it helps kill two birds with one stone then.

Hopefully UNH uses a bus that works today to get to Lowell and the game can start on time.
 
Re: Hockey East Quarterfinals UNH (10) @ Lowell (1) 3/10-3/12

Darius said:
That's what I was thinking. A few minutes prior, the person next to me had mentioned that Chanter got up slowly in the corner, but didn't see what happened. Ridiculous. The officials never recovered in the home crowd's mind, justifiably so.
Click to expand...

I saw a UNH player down and get up slowly behind the UNH net as play continued so that might be what's referenced above. After a couple minutes when play stopped, that's when the review took place.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top