brassbonanza
Super Serial
Re: Hockey East Preseason Thread. Predict and Win Eternal Glory
From an outsider's perspective, my thoughts on Madigan have been that he's definitely got a way of getting his team motivated to play in certain spots, most notably the Beanpot and last year's HE tournament. That seems to be in part why the program has been so streaky under him. But the flip side of that I've seen is that he has some real fatal flaws in his in-game coaching that were headscratching - be it a woefully misused timeout, line matchups that made no sense when he had first change, etc. Of course my sample size is pretty small, but putting those few instances together with him not being a hockey coach for 18 years prior to being hired makes it seem likely that he's a solid motivator and can get the most out of his players but is spotty when it comes to Xs and Os game prep and in-game decisions.
A brief legitimate (maybe) question to the NU fandom.
9 months ago you were calling for Madigan's head, since, among other reasons, he did not seem capable of coaching the talent he had collected to their potential. Nine months later many of you are taking offense that the rest of the conference, who remembers who you were for the other 4 years he was your coach, still does not trust him the way we do the other 5 coaches (I am including Jackson in this, ignore him if you want) who have proven to be better coaches pretty much throughout his tenure (except maybe 3(?) weekends last season).
Care to explain how he turned it around? Has his style changed at all? Seems like the same person to me, it just so happens your players decided to play defense for 3 months.
From an outsider's perspective, my thoughts on Madigan have been that he's definitely got a way of getting his team motivated to play in certain spots, most notably the Beanpot and last year's HE tournament. That seems to be in part why the program has been so streaky under him. But the flip side of that I've seen is that he has some real fatal flaws in his in-game coaching that were headscratching - be it a woefully misused timeout, line matchups that made no sense when he had first change, etc. Of course my sample size is pretty small, but putting those few instances together with him not being a hockey coach for 18 years prior to being hired makes it seem likely that he's a solid motivator and can get the most out of his players but is spotty when it comes to Xs and Os game prep and in-game decisions.