Watson Rink
Registered User
Re: Harvard Crimson Women 09-10
Time to let Kylie play?
Time to let Kylie play?
Think Pucci may have played F as well as D at Choate, presumably for those very reasons. However, with two D graduating and only two arriving, but four F arriving and only two graduating, it may not be feasible to move Pucci up front next year
Great game by our girls tonight. From the opening whistle, they came hard at BC and never let up. It took a while to put one past Boyle but once they solved her, it was over. BC never had a chance. They are almost as bad as Union in the offensive zone and just as bad in the defensive zone. Couldn't believe how many open looks we got at their goalie.
Ryabkina had one of those special games topped off by a Lane MacDonald highlight reel goal to finish the scoring. It was set play up the boards as BC's D were caught flatfooted all night and on this occasion, were simply out of position. Ryabkina flew by and made a gorgeous move to draw the puck back and over the goalie. Just amazing.
All the forwards played very well tonight forechecking BC to death and pressuring the puck all night. This game was not as close as the score might indicate. It was a rout and total domination by the Crimson.
Had a chance to sit with Joe Bertagna during the Northeastern-BU tilt (that was a barnburner) and found out something interesting. The Beanpot will have shootouts in the semis from now on because of the triple OT game that Harvard and BC played in '07. This puts Harvard at a distinct disadvantage because we don't use the shootout in the ECAC. The first game was decided by a shootout with Northeastern potting two goals to win it. I wonder if the ECAC will adopt this strategy next season. I'm assuming that shootouts won't be permitted in the NCAA tournament.
Northeastern still must lack confidence after their only Beanpot "win" (which counts as a tie in the standings) for their seniors came after seeing a 4-0 lead disappear and having to go to the shootout.
Sure, they were unknown to everyone else, because the Beanpot doesn't exactly widely publicize its rule changes.I knew about the shootouts but didn't realize they were unknown to anyone else.
You'd be surprised, I think Harvard would be competitive in the shootout. They have talented forwards, a good goalie, and IIRC from last year's interview with Anna McDonald, they do end practice with shootouts a lot, upperclassmen versus the rookies.
I don't much care for shoot outs either but if the world championship can be settled in a shootout then I think it is an exaggeration to describe the settling of a mid-season college hockey tournament by shootout as "absurd".That said, I'm willing to accept the semis and 3rd place being decided by the shootout. But not the championship, that'd be absurd.
Guess we're lucky that the Ukraine doesn't have an Olympic hockey team?
Here's something else that happened at last night's Beanpot. During the third period of the Northeastern-BU game, a woman came up to Joe Bertagna to inquire as to why Julie Piacentini was one of the referees assigned to the game when she is a Northeastern grad. It didn't occur to me but I wondered how referees are assigned and does their undergrad affiliation matter? I know Billy C used to referee college games but I don't know if he did Harvard games or would have been allowed to given his affiliation with Harvard. Is this an issue in deciding who refs a particular game? I'm not asking for any nefarious reason a la Tim Donahy, the basketball ref who was caught betting on games. I'm just wondering if a person's undergrad affiliation makes a difference or is it so rare a conflict of interest that people don't really bother to factor it in when assigning officials?
I'm just wondering if a person's undergrad affiliation makes a difference or is it so rare a conflict of interest that people don't really bother to factor it in when assigning officials?
Well I think that's also absurd. The NHL and the NCAA tournament have it right.I don't much care for shoot outs either but if the world championship can be settled in a shootout then I think it is an exaggeration to describe the settling of a mid-season college hockey tournament by shootout as "absurd".
Just my opinion, I could be wrong.
The NHL uses shootouts during the regular season, and for all it's tradition, the Beanpot is a regular-season event.Well I think that's also absurd. The NHL and the NCAA tournament have it right.
The 1980 Olympics had no OT at all; ties were left as ties.Can you imagine if the 1980 Olympics were decided by a shootout? I shudder at the thought.
I don't much care for shoot outs either but if the world championship can be settled in a shootout then I think it is an exaggeration to describe the settling of a mid-season college hockey tournament by shootout as "absurd".
Just my opinion, I could be wrong.
I agree -- it is not real hockey. But IMO, it beats some of the more arbitrary methods for resolving ties that exist in the world of sport, such as my favorite, the coin flip.A shootout is not what I would call real hockey, it is more like the skills competition the NHL does during the all star break.
Maybe -- is there a train coming?As my mother used to say (and hers before that, etc):
"If your friends all jumped off a bridge, would you?"