Re: Harvard Crimson 2016-2017
They won the ECAC tournament in '83. Beat Providence in the final 4-1. They went to the national championship game against Chris Chelios and the Badgers and lost unfortunately but went farther than any of us thought they would at the time. That season put us on the national map. The series against Michigan State at Bright was the loudest I have ever heard the rink. Bar none. Derek Bok agreed. He was there.
True but the '89 national championship team lost only three games. And we beat Minnesota in their barn for the crown. That is saying something. That team was loaded with six or seven NHL draft picks and others who could have played in the NHL.
No question this season was a treat and a half. The first two lines were something to watch. Marino and Fox gave us a glimpse of a tremendous future at Bright-Landry. And Ryan Donato keeps growing into a man child who refuses to back down. His playoff performance was special.
In 1988-89, there was so much to worry about, the team had so much baggage. Despite their '80s near-dynasty, they had won exactly one tournament since the '81 Beanpot if I'm not mistaken: The ECACs in 1987. The Boston Gardan was Harvard's house of horrors. They couldn't win big games; couldn't even get to the Beanpot. First loss at Yale. Red flag. Another house of horrors. Would they fail to get over the same humps again? Then they won the Beanpot. Ok, this year might be different: Then UVM. The Garden again. Ugh! De ja vu. And who really knew how good they were? The ECAC was relatively weak at the time.
They won the ECAC tournament in '83. Beat Providence in the final 4-1. They went to the national championship game against Chris Chelios and the Badgers and lost unfortunately but went farther than any of us thought they would at the time. That season put us on the national map. The series against Michigan State at Bright was the loudest I have ever heard the rink. Bar none. Derek Bok agreed. He was there.
2016-2017 was a model of consistency and reliability. Their unbeaten and winning streaks were longer than 1988-89's. They hit 6 out of 7 of their milestones: Beanpot, Clearly Cup, Ivy League, ECACs, first NCAA win since 1994, Harvard's first 4-team regional ever. The lack of experience in big games didn't stop them.
True but the '89 national championship team lost only three games. And we beat Minnesota in their barn for the crown. That is saying something. That team was loaded with six or seven NHL draft picks and others who could have played in the NHL.
You can't argue with a national championship, and why would you? Ultimately, that takes the cake. All the more significant because they finally slayed their demons But this year? An absolute joy. What a year, and what a three-year stretch for Harvard hockey. This program was dysfunctional for nearly two decades - not gelling till the end of seasons (sometimes), losing records, underperforming and underdeveloping their overall talent. It was maddening. The program now seems as solid now as it's every been. Harvard was the unequivocal Beast of the East. It's been a long and wayward journey back. Amen to that. Thank you team for an amazing season!
No question this season was a treat and a half. The first two lines were something to watch. Marino and Fox gave us a glimpse of a tremendous future at Bright-Landry. And Ryan Donato keeps growing into a man child who refuses to back down. His playoff performance was special.