Re: Harvard Crimson 2014-15
Some interesting numbers on the Crimson forwards once January rolled around:
Heffernan - Laing - Parker 28-32-60 2.6
D'Oench - Reber - Crowe 31-42-73 2.52
Daniels - Armstrong - Fry 22-26-48 2.09
The consistency is pretty remarkable and I think it points to everyone getting a chance to get meaningful minutes.
And not to beat a dead horse but as I was lambasted for suggesting that Syd Daniels was an egregious omission from the ECAC second and third team selections, of her 18 goals, 7 were game winners making her margin the second highest in the nation. Repeat, IN THE NATION. But yeah, I guess that still doesn't qualify her for a second or third team slot. Because heaven forbid we should actually watch the games and have an opinion.
Some interesting numbers on the Crimson forwards once January rolled around:
Heffernan - Laing - Parker 28-32-60 2.6
D'Oench - Reber - Crowe 31-42-73 2.52
Daniels - Armstrong - Fry 22-26-48 2.09
The consistency is pretty remarkable and I think it points to everyone getting a chance to get meaningful minutes.
And not to beat a dead horse but as I was lambasted for suggesting that Syd Daniels was an egregious omission from the ECAC second and third team selections, of her 18 goals, 7 were game winners making her margin the second highest in the nation. Repeat, IN THE NATION. But yeah, I guess that still doesn't qualify her for a second or third team slot. Because heaven forbid we should actually watch the games and have an opinion.
Last edited: