alslammerz
Harvard Hockey Broadcaster '09-'12
Re: Harvard Crimson 2014-15
You're right and agreeing with me all at the same time. Yes, someone can get in because they are an academic booster of the class, or because they are in the same class as an academic booster. But because this is connected to all of the sports, there's no guarantee that the academic booster from women's hockey results in a borderline player getting in for women's hockey. I'm not 100% sure on that, but I do know a lot of the speculation on the men's forum was that Harvard was failing to get a lot of men's recruits in at the same time that men's basketball was getting more players through admissions.
And as for pokechecker's hypothetical woman...she should pick the school she a) gets into b) has the major she wants and c) gives her the best financial aid package/scholarship/has the lowest tuition. Seriously, don't overlook the idea of not having a lot of student debt after graduation. But most of all, she should go where she's going to be the happiest, whatever that means for her. As for the Ivy admissions committee - well, I'm not a fan of the AI but there's plenty of non-athletes with the grades and activities that try to get in and can't too. There's only so many spots. How'd I do despite being a simpleton?
I think you missed the point. Many players with decent academics do get turned away at the Ivies because of their AI score.
However, contrary to what alslammerz indicated, I was under the impression that some borderline players do get in as a result of other players in the same class being academic boosters. I've seen cases where an Ivy candidate all of a sudden became more attractive cause their test scores went up sufficiently to make them an academic booster of the class. Certainly seen this happen at the school one of our D attended.
You're right and agreeing with me all at the same time. Yes, someone can get in because they are an academic booster of the class, or because they are in the same class as an academic booster. But because this is connected to all of the sports, there's no guarantee that the academic booster from women's hockey results in a borderline player getting in for women's hockey. I'm not 100% sure on that, but I do know a lot of the speculation on the men's forum was that Harvard was failing to get a lot of men's recruits in at the same time that men's basketball was getting more players through admissions.
And as for pokechecker's hypothetical woman...she should pick the school she a) gets into b) has the major she wants and c) gives her the best financial aid package/scholarship/has the lowest tuition. Seriously, don't overlook the idea of not having a lot of student debt after graduation. But most of all, she should go where she's going to be the happiest, whatever that means for her. As for the Ivy admissions committee - well, I'm not a fan of the AI but there's plenty of non-athletes with the grades and activities that try to get in and can't too. There's only so many spots. How'd I do despite being a simpleton?