Jeff_Jackson_for_Pres.
I miss Christian and Mark.
Re: Future of the ccha????
But the WCHA would need a D1 program to have their voice in the NCAA.
But the WCHA would need a D1 program to have their voice in the NCAA.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Future of the ccha????
- Thread starter FRICKER
- Start date
ExileOnDaytonStreet
Drunkard
Re: Future of the ccha????
In my dreams: Notre Dame goes to HE or Independent, BGSU and WMU go to NCHC, and UAH goes to WCHA.
That, or the AHA-4 join up with either BGSU and/or NCHC and UAH gets to tag along in the new CCHA.
True, though that might not mean much to BGSU.
In my dreams: Notre Dame goes to HE or Independent, BGSU and WMU go to NCHC, and UAH goes to WCHA.
That, or the AHA-4 join up with either BGSU and/or NCHC and UAH gets to tag along in the new CCHA.
Re: Future of the ccha????
So you agree with me, except you don't realize it and used terrible logic to get there? Thanks for chiming in.
So you agree with me, except you don't realize it and used terrible logic to get there? Thanks for chiming in.
TigerFan86-87
R!!!!...I!!!!!...T!!!!!!
TigerFan86-87
R!!!!...I!!!!!...T!!!!!!
Re: Future of the ccha????
Obviously written by someone not intimately familiar with the AHA. None of use would use the bolded terms above in reference to one another.
Obviously written by someone not intimately familiar with the AHA. None of use would use the bolded terms above in reference to one another.
Re: Future of the ccha????
Perhaps you forgot that Canisius went into Kalamazoo and beat Western Michigan last year 5-3 then proceeded to play them close again the next night before losing in OT.Obviously written by someone not intimately familiar with the AHA. None of use would use the bolded terms above in reference to one another.
Re: Future of the ccha????
Everyone has a good weekend once in a while. Canisius had some talent, but were never consistant enough to be an upper level AHA team.
Everyone has a good weekend once in a while. Canisius had some talent, but were never consistant enough to be an upper level AHA team.
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: Future of the ccha????
I have to give you credit. This is literally the first time I've ever seen someone on this site attempt to give props to a team for beating Western Michigan. I got a good chuckle out of that. Thanks.
I have to give you credit. This is literally the first time I've ever seen someone on this site attempt to give props to a team for beating Western Michigan. I got a good chuckle out of that. Thanks.
Re: Future of the ccha????
WMU actually had a decent season last year and rightfully deserves some credit. The initial point was to show that the AHA 4 would be competitive in a revived CCHA with WMU, BGSU and UND. It is too bad that the big boys never want to give anyone else credit for a good season. Some of them will always find a way to compare their average down year to someone else's better years. It is sad that those people never see that part of the joys of college hockey is to see another team do quite well. Good luck and may many more teams look forward to getting recognition for beating WMU.
WMU actually had a decent season last year and rightfully deserves some credit. The initial point was to show that the AHA 4 would be competitive in a revived CCHA with WMU, BGSU and UND. It is too bad that the big boys never want to give anyone else credit for a good season. Some of them will always find a way to compare their average down year to someone else's better years. It is sad that those people never see that part of the joys of college hockey is to see another team do quite well. Good luck and may many more teams look forward to getting recognition for beating WMU.
Re: Future of the ccha????
One good non-conference win does not make an upper-level team, because it certainly didn't translate into a good performance in-league. In all the years I've been watching MAAClantic Hockey, I would have to firmly put them in the middle tier of the league most years.
One good non-conference win does not make an upper-level team, because it certainly didn't translate into a good performance in-league. In all the years I've been watching MAAClantic Hockey, I would have to firmly put them in the middle tier of the league most years.
TigerFan86-87
R!!!!...I!!!!!...T!!!!!!
Re: Future of the ccha????
I can't speak for others, but I don't think it was so much about not giving WMU credit for a good season as not accepting the "CC beat WMU once in October and WMU was pretty good, therefore CC is an upper-level AHA team" rationale. By that logic, then is everyone who managed a win or tie against any tournament qualifying team an "upper-level" team in their conference? Let's take WMU for example. Amongst the teams that either beat or tied the Broncos last season were: Ferris State, Lake Superior State, Alaska, Ohio State, St. Lawrence, Bowling Green, and of course the aforementioned Canisius. Now, I realize CC is only an AHA team and the others are from "real" conferences, however... none of those schools exactly lit it up last season and none could be considered upper-level anything. The point is that even bad teams beat good teams occasionally. It doesn't mean the balance of power has shifted every time an upset happens.
Shirtless Guy
Old Dirty Basterd
Re: Future of the ccha????
Obviously Michigan Tech is a top ten team because they beat Denver in Denver last year