P
Priceless
Guest
Last edited:
http://www.uscho.com/2013/10/30/ten-finalists-named-for-four-mens-frozen-four-bids/
Boston, Tampa, Chicago and St Paul please.
The arena was really only built to accommodate a playing surface the size of a basketball court. As a result, to put in a rink, they have to take out seating behind the net one goal and in the lower corners at that same end. Those are premium seats, but like I said I think they're willing to accept the loss of some ticket sales if Brooklyn's bid got this far. However, the result is that there are some bad obstructed views at that end, with railings and ledges and stuff blocking part of the ice. I went to the Islanders-Devils exhibition game there last month and the view was great from the upper corner (I think we were in 219 or 220), but I'm not sure whether they're going to be willling to overlook the issues.What is wrong with the sight lines at Brooklyn?
Anyone know who is sponsoring the Chicago bid? Assuming Notre Dame or the B1G conference...
I assume you mean 10 years? They hosted in 2004.I think the 3 winners we see are Boston, Chicago and St. Paul. Boston has not been a host in 15 years and is a great market. The two other cities are great hockey markets as well.
I assume you mean 10 years? They hosted in 2004.
I'm going to guess St. Paul, DC, Chicago, and Tampa.
Seems odd to me that they are releasing this list and say that it is for these 4 years. It's also funny they don't have a host for the 2015 one already. Boston makes sense as a 2015 host because they have already hosted and haven't had one in a while.
The problem with Boston has been that the Jacobs family has been submitting bids essentially on a bar napkin for the past decade, assuming it'll just be handed to them. They've also balked (or so I've heard) at the NCAA requirements to have the ice and boards redone for the event.