Puck Swami
New member
Re: Fighting in college Hockey
It's an age old argument. Hockey purists say its a time-honored part of the game -- it keeps players honest, protects superstars and keeps the sticks down, as well as fills the seats with it's primal, violent entertainment value.
I think the real reason hockey players want fighting is because it can be a really fun adrenaline rush to punch someone straight in the face and not have to go to jail for it, as they would if the fight were on a street...
Progressives think the presence of fighting keeps hockey in the media shadows and goes against mainstream sports credibility, as well as taking the emphasis away from the great skills and speed of the game.
The reality is that both camps are right. Fighting works, but so can non-fighting - as we've seen in college and in the Olympics. Players can focus on playing the game at a very high level without fighting, and provide a lot more enterainment value in the process. Gretzky is right on this. Hockey has evolved. We no longer have rovers and cover-points, plexiglass has replaced chain link fences on the boards, composites have replaced wood sticks and goalie masks now cover the entire head when once there were no masks at all. Hockey can evolve without fighting, and college and Olympic hockey have pretty well proven it.
It's an age old argument. Hockey purists say its a time-honored part of the game -- it keeps players honest, protects superstars and keeps the sticks down, as well as fills the seats with it's primal, violent entertainment value.
I think the real reason hockey players want fighting is because it can be a really fun adrenaline rush to punch someone straight in the face and not have to go to jail for it, as they would if the fight were on a street...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7079e/7079e2364c7e6bc9a509f3429fba1fa1c93d7548" alt="Eek! :eek: :eek:"
Progressives think the presence of fighting keeps hockey in the media shadows and goes against mainstream sports credibility, as well as taking the emphasis away from the great skills and speed of the game.
The reality is that both camps are right. Fighting works, but so can non-fighting - as we've seen in college and in the Olympics. Players can focus on playing the game at a very high level without fighting, and provide a lot more enterainment value in the process. Gretzky is right on this. Hockey has evolved. We no longer have rovers and cover-points, plexiglass has replaced chain link fences on the boards, composites have replaced wood sticks and goalie masks now cover the entire head when once there were no masks at all. Hockey can evolve without fighting, and college and Olympic hockey have pretty well proven it.