What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

My eating a Chick-Fil-A sandwich wasn't to protest gay marriage. It was to support freedom of speech. But, such nuance is lost on most sheeple who just repeat whatever popular slogan they hear from the liberal media.

Well I didn't eat at Chick-Fil-A twice to show support for people who understand how the first amendment works.

But please, explain to me the nuances of the charges the Chick-Fil-A clowns are facing for what they said.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

I can't wait for when Romney announces his VP pick. I can picture somebody like Pawlenty being asked and accepting the night before, showing up at the press conference the next day only to see the Mittster on the podium disavowing ever offering him the job and attacking the press for suggesting differently. All the while a stunned T-Paw stands there in silence with a deer in the headlights look on his face.

TPaw has experience with that...remember he was on his way to his Press Conference to announce he was running for Senator when he got a call from Rove telling him they would "prefer" if he ran for Governor instead because they had someone else they wanted to run for Senator.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

TPaw has experience with that...remember he was on his way to his Press Conference to announce he was running for Senator when he got a call from Rove telling him they would "prefer" if he ran for Governor instead because they had someone else they wanted to run for Senator.

Funny!
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

TPaw has experience with that...remember he was on his way to his Press Conference to announce he was running for Senator when he got a call from Rove telling him they would "prefer" if he ran for Governor instead because they had someone else they wanted to run for Senator.

That someone else was Norm Coleman, which if I'm not mistaken, is the origin of the term 'horse trading'.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

Congrats...when you are done patting yourself on the back maybe you can explain to me why you felt the need to tell us that?

I never said, or implied that all the people who went there did so to protest Gay Marriage...but such nuance is lost on those sheeple who just want to blurt out their personal agenda. :D

Keep on pretending you are the only one who thinks for themselves though and that YOU know better than everyone what others are thinking and saying...it doesnt make you a hypocrite or sound crazy in the least bit Bob ;)
Part of the big spin is to make the owner of Chick-Fil-A sound like a hater, which is nowhere near what he said or is from what I've read. You know, the often successful technique of demonizing the opponent so no matter what's done to him/them it's ok because they are so bad. But, acknowledging that such spinning is going on undermines its effectiveness, so I understand your avoidance. It's entirely predictable that you accuse me of thinking I know everything, but all the variety of folks who argue the other way get a free pass from you. Did you use the word hypocrisy?
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

Fiction is way too strong a word. Is law fiction? Is morality? Is the aesthetic of beauty? Is the concept of fairness? Those things are all the accumulation of people's ideas mediated through institutions, interpreters, and history. All scientific models and theories are like that. It may even be that time and causality are like that. Basically, those are anything that derives from a human understanding of the universe. Hardly bad company to be in.

We all have some sort of difference in our understanding of all those things, and all cultures have had differences. Just as with God. As long as you can do that and compromise with the guy next door who has a different view, you're participating in a democratic political system. There is nothing inherent in the concept of God, even in monotheistic exclusivity, that precludes that.

The problem we face now is a large sub-population who will not only refuse to compromise but will sabotage the working of democracy in order not to compromise. It doesn't matter what their reason is when they do that, they've taken themselves outside the system. Essentially, they're in rebellion, but it's a special kind of rebellion where they aren't sacrificing anything or putting themselves on the line, so they can keep it up forever because it costs them nothing.

On the other hand, it's non-violent (so far), so although it's disrupting solving national problems at least it isn't building up too high a body count.
Lack of compromise is all around you. You just have trouble with the other side not compromising by moving toward what you want. The problems our nation faces are far deeper than any one group not compromising or holding up progress.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

Lack of compromise is all around you. You just have trouble with the other side not compromising by moving toward what you want. The problems our nation faces are far deeper than any one group not compromising or holding up progress.

Considering how much bending over Obama and the Democrats have done and still nothing has gotten done in Washington, I beg to differ. Even Obamacare was a compromise and NO WHERE NEAR what the Democrats wanted.

No, sorry, there's only one no compromise party. There's only one party signing Grover's pledge. There's only one party that thinks trickle down economics still works. There's only one party that won't compromise on abortion or immigration policy.

Tell you what. Tell me one major compromise position of Mitch McConnell or the Bone Man. I bet you can't come up with one.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

Lack of compromise is all around you. You just have trouble with the other side not compromising by moving toward what you want. The problems our nation faces are far deeper than any one group not compromising or holding up progress.
Thanks again for telling me what I can see and think. You really are a treasure.

There are always individuals who won't compromise, but this is something new -- a large political subset who won't and whose leaders won't. Some may call that integrity as opposed to horsetrading, but it's very hard to see how anything can get done when one side will let the country burn unless they get everything they want.

That can work in a small and/or homogenous polis in which the vast majority are in agreement, but it can't work in a diverse political culture. Hence the need by that group to dismiss or even demonize diversity itself.
 
Last edited:
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

Thanks again with telling me what I can see and think. You really are a treasure.

There are always individuals who won't compromise, but this is something new -- a large political subset who won't and whose leaders won't. Some may call that integrity as opposed to horsetrading, but it's very hard to see how anything can get done when one side will let the country burn unless they get everything they want.
I suggest that someday you take off your partisan blinders. Hyperpartisanship like yours is a big contributor to our nation's problems.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

Considering how much bending over Obama and the Democrats have done and still nothing has gotten done in Washington, I beg to differ. Even Obamacare was a compromise and NO WHERE NEAR what the Democrats wanted.

No, sorry, there's only one no compromise party. There's only one party signing Grover's pledge. There's only one party that thinks trickle down economics still works. There's only one party that won't compromise on abortion or immigration policy.

Tell you what. Tell me one major compromise position of Mitch McConnell or the Bone Man. I bet you can't come up with one.

What a pant load, was it Repubs who stopped what the Dems wanted in Obamacare or Lobbyists? There is only one right answer
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

Some may call that integrity as opposed to horsetrading, but it's very hard to see how anything can get done when one side will let the country burn unless they get everything they want.


for some reason, I have a hunch you are not referring to Obama's threat to veto a bill that extends current tax rates for middle-income taxpayers if it also extends the current tax rates for high-income taxpayers......
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

Considering how much bending over Obama and the Democrats have done and still nothing has gotten done in Washington, I beg to differ. Even Obamacare was a compromise and NO WHERE NEAR what the Democrats wanted.

No, sorry, there's only one no compromise party. There's only one party signing Grover's pledge. There's only one party that thinks trickle down economics still works. There's only one party that won't compromise on abortion or immigration policy.

Tell you what. Tell me one major compromise position of Mitch McConnell or the Bone Man. I bet you can't come up with one.
So Obamacare, which was a major move toward what the Dems want and away from what conservatives want, is a sign of Democratic compromise? We just see things very differently. To me, moving an issue the liberal direction, but not all the way they want to go right away, is not an example of compromise. The fact that even some Dems were uncomfortable with how far it went, keeping it from going further, speaks volumes. So, not everyone signing up to move issues all the way the liberals want to go is deemed lacking in compromise in this upside down world. Glad we can at least nail down just how bizarro it all is.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

What's most hilarious about the politics of obstruction is that it is now 100% dependent on Mittens Romney becoming President. Short of that none of The Boner or Itch McConnell's efforts will have produced anything of value for the GOP.

Upon an Obama re-election, health care gets implemented in its entirety. Nothing else needs to be done legislatively. Same thing for Dodd-Frank. On taxes the Bush gimmicks expire. Again nothing needs to be done on Obama's part to make that happen and unless the GOP wins the 67 seats they'll need to override his veto control of the Senate and House will be irrelavent. Afghanistan is winding down regardless of tired old geezers like McCain who want to be there indefinitely. Righties can continue to stonewall DREAM act if they'd like to have generations of Hispanics vote against them by a 3:1 margin for the next fifty years I suppose but again I'm not sure what good that does in the long run.

So I have to wonder what all this effort has been for? About the only think they could do as a majority party in the Senate is block a SCOTUS nominee for a time but with even that eventually you have to confirm somebody. Beyond that everybody else Obama can just use a recess appointment to get around obstructionist idiocy.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

So Obamacare, which was a major move toward what the Dems want and away from what conservatives want, is a sign of Democratic compromise?
The history of how Obamacare developed does show it was, if not a compromise, at least settling. The core of Obamacare was developed at conservative think tanks in the 90's to head off the possibility of single payer. The idea was to have an alternative proposal that would be at worst a firewall against the actual liberal position or, at best, muddy the waters enough that the current system (and its profiteers) remained unaffected.

Obamacare is in some ways "the worst of both worlds" for each party -- the people who really win BIG are the insurance companies. I agree that it's a "liberal victory" as a symbol and as a harbinger of future health care reform. The other side shot their wad telling us how the world would end with it and so, when the world does not end, future measures will be easier.

I'd say the closest comparison on the other side is Welfare Reform. It was originally concocted as a way of stopping the more brutal plans on the right. When it was finally adopted liberal cries that it would end the social safety net were refuted, making it easier for the right to go after other social programs.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

The history of how Obamacare developed does show it was, if not a compromise, at least settling. The core of Obamacare was developed at conservative think tanks in the 90's to head off the possibility of single payer. The idea was to have an alternative proposal that would be at worst a firewall against the actual liberal position or, at best, muddy the waters enough that the current system (and its profiteers) remained unaffected.

Obamacare is in some ways "the worst of both worlds" for each party -- the people who really win BIG are the insurance companies. I agree that it's a "liberal victory" as a symbol and as a harbinger of future health care reform. The other side shot their wad telling us how the world would end with it and so, when the world does not end, future measures will be easier.

I'd say the closest comparison on the other side is Welfare Reform. It was originally concocted as a way of stopping the more brutal plans on the right. When it was finally adopted liberal cries that it would end the social safety net were refuted, making it easier for the right to go after other social programs.
The world will end, so to speak, eventually, as this, along with so many other things we can't afford, drive our nation to insolvency. Just a matter of how the ride down goes the way it's looking. At this point I don't even really care that much about national health care or not in and of itself, just that it's more money out the door quicker that we don't have.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

So I have to wonder what all this effort has been for?
Remember the Clinton impeachment? Same thing: when they lose, they try to overturn the election by some other means.

At some point either (1) their own supporters are going to have to get sick of that, stop rationalizing it and demand the GOP grows up, or (2) they're going to have to lose so much support that the national party itself (well, their donors) decides to go another way. Otherwise there's no incentive for them to change. When they win elections they get their goodies, and when they lose elections they get to sabotage the country and then campaign on the other side "not getting things done." It may be morally reprehensible, but it's politically brilliant.
 
Last edited:
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

The world will end, so to speak, eventually, as this, along with so many other things we can't afford, drive our nation to insolvency. Just a matter of how the ride down goes the way it's looking. At this point I don't even really care that much about national health care or not in and of itself, just that it's more money out the door quicker that we don't have.
That world ends no matter which side is in power. The powers that decide elections now are international capital, and America is just another leveraged buyout opportunity. That's the legacy of the last thirty years. Since capital knows no patriotism the only way to stop that is regulation, but we're not allowed to do that because business is the pure hearted hero and government is the big bad old villain.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!

The world will end, so to speak, eventually, as this, along with so many other things we can't afford, drive our nation to insolvency. Just a matter of how the ride down goes the way it's looking. At this point I don't even really care that much about national health care or not in and of itself, just that it's more money out the door quicker that we don't have.

Did you say this when the last guy started two unnecessary wars that blew a hole the size of Montana into the deficit? How about NCLB? Or the NON-FUNDED Medicare Prescription entitlement. You can argue the particulars but at least Obamacare was funded. Maybe its not funded to your satisfaction. Maybe you believe the actual costs use to calculate the funding were lies. Either way they tried to fund it. The Republican passed agenda didn't fund anything that they passed.

See the difference?

I doubt you do. But it's there and it's huge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top