What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Election 2024: Dark Brandon to the Resucue!

Florida could be fun...Trump is still insulting DeSantis and with abortion on the ballot who knows how this goes.
 
Florida could be fun...Trump is still insulting DeSantis and with abortion on the ballot who knows how this goes.

Interesting to see indeed. Does it energize democrat voters? Or does it take away a reason for pro choice minded republican leaners to vote for a democrat?
 
Interesting to see indeed. Does it energize democrat voters? Or does it take away a reason for pro choice minded republican leaners to vote for a democrat?

I am under no illusion that Trump won't likely win...but if the Dems want a shot they have it right now. They should also go hard after Rick Scott...

Again I don't believe Flo(R)ida will go Blue...but the Dems are getting about as favorable a play as they can get. If (and I stress IF) Abortion Rights win...then the fact that Trump is bigly bragging he is why Roe went away can't be helpful. The fact that he refuses to be even cordial to Ronny "White Boots" DeSantis is probably not great either.

Its no secret that the GOP is very worried because a lot of states are looking to have ballot initiatives and they have no real counter. Add in a money crunch and it is even worse. According to the AP Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada and South Dakota are trying to advance various bills on Abortion Rights. That is a lot of fighting the GOP can't afford even if only a few get it on the ballot.
 
So Florida's gonna vote 58% for pot, 61% for abortion rights and 53% for Trump.

As happens in pretty much every red state with a ballot initiative/referendum. About 80% of the time the GOP wins the elections while the voters pick the "liberal" position on the referendum.
 
I am under no illusion that Trump won't likely win...but if the Dems want a shot they have it right now. They should also go hard after Rick Scott...

It's not as much about winning Florida, though that would be nice, it's more about forcing them to spend limited funds on a state they assumed safe, leaving less for the states actually in play.
 
It's not as much about winning Florida, though that would be nice, it's more about forcing them to spend limited funds on a state they assumed safe, leaving less for the states actually in play.

Agreed. Spread them as thin as possible.
 
Sounds like Arizona has enough signature to put abortion on the nov ballot

Kari Lake is probably preparing her "rigged" argument cause what little chance she had just died. If I am an election worker in Maricopa County I am getting security cause it is going to get ugly.

But Biden has to be dancing because Trump needs to win Arizona to have a chance (amongst other states) and this just made it exponentially harder...assuming it actually happens of course.
 
It's not as much about winning Florida, though that would be nice, it's more about forcing them to spend limited funds on a state they assumed safe, leaving less for the states actually in play.

Extremely limited, because Lara is making sure all available money gets funneled to daddy in law.
 
Trump is going to attempt to "infrastructure week" AND/OR Obamacare Abortion by saying he will have a fix for it and then never stating what the fix is.
 
It's not as much about winning Florida, though that would be nice, it's more about forcing them to spend limited funds on a state they assumed safe, leaving less for the states actually in play.

This seems like a logical take (harm coming to one party or candidate or another party or candidate because they had to spend more time or $$$ in a state than originally expected and ended up neglecting somewhere else) but I wonder if there is evidence of a scholarly sort that backs it up. As I said, it makes sense and in this case we hope it to be true, but does it actually matter. Anyone wanna do the research for me? Is it even possible to empirically determine?
 
Back
Top