reggiedunlop
New member
Re: Eastern D-III hockey -- where do we go from here???
News embargo? C'mon.
News embargo? C'mon.
Thank you all for your replies, it seems there has been no formal announcement from any school or league. Based simply on the Avatars purchased, the DIII fans have given some money to the USCHO, albeit less than the D I followers, perhaps USCHO will accept the question and pursue an answer.
Yeah, that'd be nice. Only problem with it is operating on the assumption USCHO might have an employee who cares.
News embargo? C'mon.
This agreement was a compromise for those who wanted to immediately expel the NE10 teams after this season and also allowed teams in the league who were unable/unwilling to sign a binding four year commitment to have a couple of years to work out some their internal athletic issues.
2) Check out this article. Try to find the winner of the Fastest Skater competition (also, second in Hardest Shot, but who's counting?).
Yes.St.Mike's has previously stated that they are interested in reclassifying as a DIII school.St.A's is less commited, but is beginning the exploratory process.Ther are two major stumbling blocks for both.
1.the current DIII moratorium.
2.finding a league(es) for all their sports ex hockey.this has emerged as a major issue,
Both schools are hoping for(wishful thinking) that the NCAA will reconsider and reinstitute a DII/DIII league and/ or be grandfathered into DIII for tournament purposes.
remember that the NCAA instituted a DII tournament in the late 90's and then eliminated the tournament for lack of teams,this was the time to have the NCAA figure out a solution but the teams missed the opportunity.
Now we have the current situation.
My only concern with this arrangement is that the 8 D-III schools will be playing 4 games that are not used for tournament selection. This COULD prove a problem with a bubble team (right Prof????? -- I earned a C in stats in college).I have information from an extremely reliable source that the current ECAC EAST league will remain in place for two years,following this year's season.St.A's and St.Mike's are included in this arrangement for the next two years and after that time expires,who knows.
The teams will play a home and away game within their league and in all probablility keep their travel partner arrangements.
This agreement was a compromise for those who wanted to immediately expel the NE10 teams after this season and also allowed teams in the league who were unable/unwilling to sign a binding four year commitment to have a couple of years to work out some their internal athletic issues.
My only concern with this arrangement is that the 8 D-III schools will be playing 4 games that are not used for tournament selection. This COULD prove a problem with a bubble team (right Prof????? -- I earned a C in stats in college).
The reality is that it doesn't hurt as much as people think, but the perception to the effect is enough to make people who don't through the consequences of the selection system to see it as a bigger deal than it is. It's just you play 4 exhibition games during the season for all practical purposes. Whether you go 4-0 or 0-4 really doesn't matter (except for the effect on your playoff positioning).
True, but considering how tight the numbers can be at the end, can't it be fairly significant in the difference it would make if four games against DII teams were replaced by four wins against DIII teams? 16-5 (.7619) v. 20-5 (.8000) could easily be a large enough difference to matter come selection time.
I have information from an extremely reliable source that the current ECAC EAST league will remain in place for two years,following this year's season.St.A's and St.Mike's are included in this arrangement for the next two years and after that time expires,who knows.
The teams will play a home and away game within their league and in all probablility keep their travel partner arrangements.
This agreement was a compromise for those who wanted to immediately expel the NE10 teams after this season and also allowed teams in the league who were unable/unwilling to sign a binding four year commitment to have a couple of years to work out some their internal athletic issues.
Unless something has changed in the last 2 weeks: This would be accurate...![]()