Dump Term 2 Part 4: Twilight of the Derps

[ScoobyDoo]

24Hours Ukraine (@24hoursukraine.bsky.social)

🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸 Witkoff on Putin: He's never been anything other than straight with me. I say that and I get attacked but that is an accurate statement.

bsky.app

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Quote of the day.

Rob Reiner Fan (@rob-reiner-fan.bsky.social)

"I'm just saying [FBI Director] Chris Wray doesn't need a government funded G5 jet to go to vacations. Maybe we ground that plane. $15,000 every time it takes off. Just a thought." Kash Patel in 2023

bsky.app

 

[French Rage]

Hey remember when they DOJ say they couldn't use Section 122: https://www.cfr.org/articles/trumps-lawyers-are-wrong-about-section-122

On July 31, before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers spent considerable effort defending President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs by drawing a false distinction. They argued that Trump had to use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to enact his Liberation Day tariffs because Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allows the president to use tariffs or quotas to address balance of payments deficits, could not do the job.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

Hey remember when they DOJ say they couldn't use Section 122: https://www.cfr.org/articles/trumps-lawyers-are-wrong-about-section-122

Yes, sir. They sure can now. The lawyer that won the case in the Supreme Court said over the weekend that they argued incessantly that they could not use it. Now they can. Should be an interesting Court case next go round.

 

[ScoobyDoo]

George Conway ⚖️🇺🇸 (@gtconway.bsky.social)

“I would never call a President of the United States of any party a fucking piece of shit on a podcast, until today. He is a fucking piece of shit. This is where we are. I want to go back to an America where I can’t make the case that the president is a fucking piece of shit.”

bsky.app

 

[French Rage]

https://www.techdirt.com/2026/02/20...o-justify-nationalizing-the-election-process/

"I have searched the depths of Legal Arguments not yet articulated or vetted on this subject, and will be presenting an irrefutable one in the very near future." So you're going through quack takes and preparing one of your own?

 

[FadeToBlack&Gold]

Not sure what he'd have to shart out that he hasn't already. Blue states in rebellion letting illegals vote, stealing elections from God-fearing, white male 'Murican candidates, blah blah blah.