What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Dump Term 2, Part 2: "A third term would be a big shattering."


It should be noted Trump says pharma is exempt but the EU says otherwise.
I read somewhere that generic drugs were exempt, but brand names were not.
 
NYTimes is reporting Harvard is going to capitulate for a cool half a billion.

If they fold with their essentially unlimited funds, there's no one left to fight. No wonder the Dems constantly lose with liberal institutions like that.

Never thought I'd see the return of McCarthyism in my lifetime, but here we are. And given the GOP has no shame, that line isn't going to stop it this time.
 
NYTimes is reporting Harvard is going to capitulate for a cool half a billion.

If they fold with their essentially unlimited funds, there's no one left to fight. No wonder the Dems constantly lose with liberal institutions like that.

Never thought I'd see the return of McCarthyism in my lifetime, but here we are. And given the GOP has no shame, that line isn't going to stop it this time.
The Ivies move to irrelevance is alnost complete.
 
The Ivies move to irrelevance is alnost complete.

My screed on eLynah responding to a Very Serious Person advocating we "have no choice" but follow Harvard's example. Day Hall is the administration building at Cornell:

Thank you, New York Times, but no.

They do have a choice. They are actively electing not to exercise it. It is policy, not a natural law.

A lot of people lost a lot of money opposing slavery. A lot of people lost a lot of money opposing segregation. The sensible argument by the comfortable center is always OH NOES! Don't directly oppose it; live to fight another day. So they trade other's rights for their comfort. That is how highly evil outcomes are always insulated within a democratic system. People themselves have the power of their convictions -- they go through hell to fight these thugs. But when you fold their will into institutions, those institutions' prime directive is self-preservation. Cornell wants to preserve Cornell. The world can burn if Day Hall survives.

If you don't stand for the marginalized, always, everywhere, then nobody is safe, ever, anywhere. 1860, 1940, 2020... apparently we have to relearn the lesson every 80 years that there is no compromising with these sociopathic fucks.

You either fight them now in the courts or later in your attic.
 

Why did they think this was a good idea?
 

Why did they think this was a good idea?
Answering the question? No one knows.

He should be rotting in a jailcell but our country is too weak to hold anyone accountable except the poor and defenseless.
 
Back
Top