Re: Diet and Exercise 2010: Whatever it takes
From Quiz: "when i was playing in college, i wouldn't have said that i was in great shape. i had my fat layers here and there and was definitely one of the slowest on my team. my stats were 5'9" and 175lbs (which no one ever believed ... until they ran into me).
but now, i look back on those days and realize how good of shape i actually was in ... particularly when i try to do any sort of plyometrics. ow. on the flip side, i'm a much stronger runner now and my lifting is arguably at the same level. so maybe now it's not that i'm necessarily in WORSE shape, just DIFFERENT shape as my sports and goals have changed."
Quiz again: " ... if you do really care about just losing fat/not pounds, then don't post that you'd like to lose weight even though "oh well i don't care if i really do." it's one or the other. you can lose the belly fat and not drop a **** pound due to the way muscle works.
just be healthy and look healthy for what your body shape is. at 5'9", all the charts say i should weigh around 140lbs. however, if i actually got down to that, you'd think i was anorexic, because it would look THAT BAD on my frame.
i'm okay with the 165ish i'm at right now. i'd be happier if it were a leaner, fitter 165 (or even 175 if i go back up again), though, as my body fat has gone up since college. oops."
Would seem to me that'd it be better to build up muscle since you are already fairly light... and if your playing hockey that'd be more helpful. IIRC, wasn't Quiz in her top training at some average height (5'6"ish?) and 160 pounds... I remember that because it was kinda freakish (no offense, Quiz) but if you are in shape and that's how the numbers line up then no big deal.
From Quiz: "when i was playing in college, i wouldn't have said that i was in great shape. i had my fat layers here and there and was definitely one of the slowest on my team. my stats were 5'9" and 175lbs (which no one ever believed ... until they ran into me).
but now, i look back on those days and realize how good of shape i actually was in ... particularly when i try to do any sort of plyometrics. ow. on the flip side, i'm a much stronger runner now and my lifting is arguably at the same level. so maybe now it's not that i'm necessarily in WORSE shape, just DIFFERENT shape as my sports and goals have changed."
Yeah, I completely agree. I'm way more interested in building muscle mass and losing fat than losing pounds. I don't care what I weigh, as long as I feel like I look good and am fit and healthy. It's just hard to get out of the sick mentality that most women grow up around where it is the number on the scale that matters. Even if you are thin and muscular, it is hard to tell people you are 5'-2" and 135 or 140.
I mean, I think guys grow up with it too, but it's a little different, especially if you are already skinny. All my brother wants to do is gain weight.
Quiz again: " ... if you do really care about just losing fat/not pounds, then don't post that you'd like to lose weight even though "oh well i don't care if i really do." it's one or the other. you can lose the belly fat and not drop a **** pound due to the way muscle works.
just be healthy and look healthy for what your body shape is. at 5'9", all the charts say i should weigh around 140lbs. however, if i actually got down to that, you'd think i was anorexic, because it would look THAT BAD on my frame.
i'm okay with the 165ish i'm at right now. i'd be happier if it were a leaner, fitter 165 (or even 175 if i go back up again), though, as my body fat has gone up since college. oops."