omahasioux1
Well-known member
Re: Denver at North Dakota - Saturday 10/30/10
It looked like a good hard hit.
It looked like a good hard hit.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Denver at North Dakota - Saturday 10/30/10
- Thread starter du78
- Start date
Re: Denver at North Dakota - Saturday 10/30/10
thanks for the clarification. Never want to see a guy get hurt. Wishing Jesse a quick and speedy recovery.
CC and Minnesota knotted at 1 in the 1st
thanks for the clarification. Never want to see a guy get hurt. Wishing Jesse a quick and speedy recovery.
CC and Minnesota knotted at 1 in the 1st
du78
Gunning For 10
Re: Denver at North Dakota - Saturday 10/30/10
Led with his elbow to Jesse's head as he was looking down to dish the puck off, another UND player was trailing Jesse that he was trying to shed and knew was there. He did not see Malone in front of him. Malone could have held up with the flying elbow.
Led with his elbow to Jesse's head as he was looking down to dish the puck off, another UND player was trailing Jesse that he was trying to shed and knew was there. He did not see Malone in front of him. Malone could have held up with the flying elbow.
fightingbooya
Registered User
Re: Denver at North Dakota - Saturday 10/30/10
IMHO, I felt that it was led with the shoulder, but because the player had his head down looking at the puck the shoulder made contact with the head. He did have a fairly good head of steam going and did skate a decent length to make the hit, the reason I don't like the call though is because if the players' head was up the penalty never would have been called. Just one of the calls that could go either way IMO.
IMHO, I felt that it was led with the shoulder, but because the player had his head down looking at the puck the shoulder made contact with the head. He did have a fairly good head of steam going and did skate a decent length to make the hit, the reason I don't like the call though is because if the players' head was up the penalty never would have been called. Just one of the calls that could go either way IMO.
Siouxfan_inDenver
Registered User
Siouxfan_inDenver
Registered User
fightingbooya
Registered User
Re: Denver at North Dakota - Saturday 10/30/10
That was a completely different situation, and it is quite classless to bring up an injury that could have ended a young mans' career. In that situation Genoway was facing the boards with his head down and the player skated all the way down the ice, this was completely different in every way shape and form. The player wasn't facing the boards and the player didn't skate all the way down the ice. I can understand the frustration on the injury, but uncalled for.
omahasioux1
Well-known member
omahasioux1
Well-known member
Re: Denver at North Dakota - Saturday 10/30/10
BC lost.
BC lost.
Re: Denver at North Dakota - Saturday 10/30/10
I just want to know what happened. I'll make judgements based on what happened later. As I said, you never want to see a player get hurt, clean hit or not.
I just want to know what happened. I'll make judgements based on what happened later. As I said, you never want to see a player get hurt, clean hit or not.
fightingbooya
Registered User
Re: Denver at North Dakota - Saturday 10/30/10
Where the hell does Denver get these **** goalies every year, man am I sick of them stealing games all the time!
Where the hell does Denver get these **** goalies every year, man am I sick of them stealing games all the time!