French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
And horse-paste gave you shit grammar. See, both are relevant.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Covid 2023
- Thread starter Kepler
- Start date
https://apnews.com/article/covid-vaccines-coronavirus-234f27c74438fb4812a014dbd98ddbde
FDA approved. CDC to approve next. Good news!
FDA approved. CDC to approve next. Good news!
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Anecdotally, it's spreading like wildfire amongst friends even in different circles. Yep families in the last three days. Another half dozen over the past week.
between school and the state fair and everything else, it's moving again.
we're going to be heading to a wedding in Detroit this week. We've been masking the past week to help avoid covid or any other bugs. We're also planning on masking on the flight and in the airport.
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Going back to this post for a minute. I'm curious if your doc said to wait until late fall, early winter because he didn't expect the updated boosters out until then or just a general timing thing. From a few posts ago it sounds like next week will be the rollout.
Is the "wait" advice still applicable do you think? Anyone else also care to chime in?
My $0.03. The protection is robust for at least a month or two and then gradually less so after that. Ideally overlapping with as many protection-case-days (effectiveness*cases/day*days) as possible. In my head that's November/December. So maybe that means wait a month?
It seems as though you get about 3-4 months of solid prophylactic protection post vaccination or infection for Covid, and seemingly years of severity-reduction after that. Which is good! It would be better if the prophylactic protection was longer, but considering this is one of the 3-5 most contagious diseases in human history, that isn't surprising.
Similar with flu, although influenza, I think, mutates far more easily and thus evades immunity easier.
All in all, I think a combination of "new booster available late September" plus timing the 3-4 months of prophylactic immunity over the worst time for communicable diseases (winter, in most of the US), suggests that both availability and effectivity are reasons to wait a bit.
If you go get vaccinated now, great. Whatever. Do it. The current booster is excellent. But if you want maximum efficacy and timeline, then wait until October. Personally, I'm waiting for mid-late October.
Similar with flu, although influenza, I think, mutates far more easily and thus evades immunity easier.
All in all, I think a combination of "new booster available late September" plus timing the 3-4 months of prophylactic immunity over the worst time for communicable diseases (winter, in most of the US), suggests that both availability and effectivity are reasons to wait a bit.
If you go get vaccinated now, great. Whatever. Do it. The current booster is excellent. But if you want maximum efficacy and timeline, then wait until October. Personally, I'm waiting for mid-late October.
Yeah I don't think it will be available for 9/18, as it was only approved by the FDA today and I'm not sure when the CDC plans to meet. I think mid-October would be safest but no real idea.
Truer words havent been spoken in this forum since at least Feb of 2020.
You do know that this is hysterical to read, yes? Timing a window of when to take a vaccine for maximum effectiveness? 3-4 months of solid prophylactic protection? Do I take it now, or mid-october or late october?
Then it is - "The current booster is excellent." - But Just approved today? So what is it, the marketing brochure touted excellent results?
Is it possible for a hypochondriac make up their mind? Then maybe Nov 2nd would be better because it is a Thursday.
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Gracias
Oh this is so exciting! It is like getting baptized again! I would like one in each arm if they let me.
I love the FDA, they care about me so much. I was worried this might not get approved with their track record of holding pharmaceutical companies accountable and their rigorous review process. And so amazing the Quackccine companies run their own safety protocols, I can't imagine a better way to do it.
I don't even care if the Quackccine keeps me from developing cold symptoms. I love my new cult.
And this is definitely the Winter of death. If you don't take the Quackccine you deserve to die.
The irony here is that they literally sequence the "virus" from a computer model. Fukcing moron.
Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
This does not exactly paint a rosy picture of the FDA's recent activities ...
https://justthenews.com/government/...-one-size-fits-all-covid-booster-strategy-fda
"Weill Cornell Medical College immunologist John Moore told Just the News in Monday, before the FDA announcement, that he favored making boosters available for younger people — with their doctors' approval — primarily for the "mental well being" of those who "have angst about not getting a regular vaccine boost."
While boosting them provides "possible (and hard to quantify) benefits" to protect their "older, at risk colleagues/relatives," Moore wrote in an email, it does not pose "significant health risks" to young people at low risk from COVID, "a line the anti-vaxxers take and thrive on."
Last month the Department of Health and Human Services awarded more than $1.4 billion to develop new COVID vaccines and therapeutics despite CDC data showing just 1 in 6 Americans, and fewer than half of those over 65, are "up to date" with COVID vaccinations."
https://justthenews.com/government/...-one-size-fits-all-covid-booster-strategy-fda
"Weill Cornell Medical College immunologist John Moore told Just the News in Monday, before the FDA announcement, that he favored making boosters available for younger people — with their doctors' approval — primarily for the "mental well being" of those who "have angst about not getting a regular vaccine boost."
While boosting them provides "possible (and hard to quantify) benefits" to protect their "older, at risk colleagues/relatives," Moore wrote in an email, it does not pose "significant health risks" to young people at low risk from COVID, "a line the anti-vaxxers take and thrive on."
Last month the Department of Health and Human Services awarded more than $1.4 billion to develop new COVID vaccines and therapeutics despite CDC data showing just 1 in 6 Americans, and fewer than half of those over 65, are "up to date" with COVID vaccinations."
Jesus, the "sources" you find are something else. Looking at Moore's history is that of a cautious proponent of vaccines, but the caution comes in the form of "but they aren't fool proof so don't think of them as some magic bullet". Which, of course, has been brutalized out of context by the covidiots into meaning "so you shouldn't get them".
The dishonesty is still staggering, despite how unsurprising it is.
The dishonesty is still staggering, despite how unsurprising it is.
Great response. Attack the source to end any sort of conversation. Such a good little Fascist, keep up the good work Brown Shirt.
LMFAO, they are still using the Emergency Use Authorization.
Very valid points of discussion:
“researchers voiced concerns to mainstream science and health publications in recent days that the one-size-fits-all model may be backfiring.
Such experts also questioned whether updated jabs, based on receding Omicron subvariants, will meaningfully benefit Americans outside narrow ranges, if at all.”
“Dr. Paul Offit, a pediatrician, vaccine and infectious diseases expert, and vaccine adviser to the Food and Drug Administration, said most healthy young Americans do not require an additional COVID-19 booster shot.”
According to Offit, the updated boosters from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are probably best reserved for people at high risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19: older adults, people with multiple coexisting conditions, and the immunocompromised.
"Specifically, those over 75 years of age, those who have health problems that put them at highest risk of severe disease (such as obesity, chronic lung disease, chronic heart disease, and diabetes, among others) [and] those who are immune-compromised, and those who are pregnant" are the people who need the booster, he advised, as reported by the Daily Mail.”
lmfao
https://x.com/martymakary/status/1700741474248274134?s=46&t=upVg0Js-mrW4iah6iccUyA
So all Democrats only go to the best schools (private ones, as they are the only ones who can afford them, supposedly) so they can be super intelligent like the mensa crowd on here? So what school did Susanna Gibson go to? Cornell like Kep? Small ivy or superior state univs? An interesting method for raising campaign funds, ya think? Maybe she was Homeschooled?
https://nypost.com/2023/09/11/house-candidate-susanna-gibson-performed-sex-acts-on-webcam-for-tips/
FadeToBlack&Gold
Kettle Medallion
Pretty much this. If you choose to believe in conspiracies rather than get vaccinated, then IDGAF anymore. Go own those libs, bro!
It sucks for the tiny percentage of people who legit can't be vaccinated because of other medical conditions, but the vast majority of otherwise healthy society isn't beholden to cater to them. They need to take steps to look out for themselves, just as they usually do.
Go own the libs? LMFAO, Statism is a cult.
Conspiracy? LMFAO
It is literally cold symptoms for anyone that is remotely healthy. And the vast majority of cases are asymptomatic. Feel free to take an endless supply of shots that have proven to be next to worthless.