What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Conspiracy Theory Du Jour

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour

solovsfett said:
https://whowhatwhy.org/2017/11/13/jfk-files-new-light-oswald-mexico-city/

A bit on what the releases have contained
- earl cabbell (Dallas mayor who changed the parade route) was CIA
- David Phillips' file (he was one of Oswald' CIA handlers) is missing in its entirety all reports/information from 1961-1965
-counterintelligence (James Angleton) opened a file on LHO for the CI and SIG in oct 1959. He was used in an attempt to expose a mole at Langley. Further, aside from his run-ins with Joannides paid assets (the DRE) in New Orleans and his radio debate set-up by the cia's Ed Butler, LHO was monitored by Angleton for four years and at a critical moment in Mexico City or just after the alleged trip, it seems counterintelligence told the FBI to back off Oswald. We'll know more when the FBI releases their files.

At the end of the day if we're to get the final denouement it will come from the unredacted files of David Phillips, George Joannides, bill Harvey, Allen Dulles, Jim Angleton, David Morales. In other words the CIA is telling us to get bent, they'll never allow unexpurgated access to information that shows they authored the hit, that would constitute a national security threat in their eyes.
Click to expand...

LHO

BHO

:eek:!!!!

too similar or what?
 
The Sicatoka said:
The middle/name initial alone reveals the conspiracy: John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, Mark David Chapman, John Wayne Gacy, ad infinitum, ad nauseum ...

The only guy not part of this great conspiracy? Sirhan Sirhan <-- he was a fur-ah-ner. ;)
Click to expand...

Laugh, but the day of Vegas I told the locals here that if we hear of the shooters middle name that is the tell tell that he is a cia plant :)
 
The Sicatoka said:
The middle/name initial alone reveals the conspiracy: John Wilkes Booth, Lee Harvey Oswald, James Earl Ray, Mark David Chapman, John Wayne Gacy, ad infinitum, ad nauseum ...

The only guy not part of this great conspiracy? Sirhan Sirhan <-- he was a fur-ah-ner. ;)
Click to expand...

Uh uh. When he killed RFK, the newsies called him Sirhan Bishara Sirhan.
The next day, on June 6, the Los Angeles Times printed an article by Jerry Cohen which discussed Sirhan's motive for the assassination, confirmed by the memos that Sirhan wrote to himself. The article stated:

When the Jordanian nationalist, Sirhan Bishara Sirhan, allegedly shot Kennedy, ostensibly because of the senator's advocacy of U.S. support for Israel, the crime with which he was charged was in essence another manifestation of the centuries-old hatred between Arab and Jew.
Click to expand...
(Wiki)
 
mookie1995 said:
LHO

BHO

:eek:!!!!

too similar or what?
Click to expand...
IMO it's a subject that deserves a level of serious thought and discourse, the congressional investigators who fought for the truth in 77-78 aren't laughing about this today: see Dan Hardway or Ed Lopez. Gaeton Fonzi (rip) as well.
 
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour

Evidently this has been around for 35 years but it was new to me.
 
Last edited:
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour

If people can wager their salvation on words allegedly uttered two thousand years ago and filtered through multiple translations (by people with a stake in the content) of multiple levels hearsay, then many modern conspiracies don't seem so far fetched.
 
Last edited:
burd said:
If people can wager their salvation on words allegedly uttered two thousand years ago and filtered through multiple translations (by people with a stake in the content) of multiple levels hearsay, then many modern conspiracies don't seem so far fetched.
Click to expand...

Mary magdelene wrote a gospel??

She may have

;)
 
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour

Kepler said:
Evidently this has been around for 35 years but it was new to me.
Click to expand...

I wasn't even alive when she died, and I've heard other people my parents' age say they think there was a drunken argument and Wagner pushed her overboard, let the dinghy loose, waited a couple hours, then radioed it in.

It was the OJ "did he, or didn't he?" case of its day, without the racial overtones.
 
FadeToBlack&Gold said:
I wasn't even alive when she died, and I've heard other people my parents' age say they think there was a drunken argument and Wagner pushed her overboard, let the dinghy loose, waited a couple hours, then radioed it in.

It was the OJ "did he, or didn't he?" case of its day, without the racial overtones.
Click to expand...

And they both got off... Justice IS blind :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top