USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Conspiracy Theory Du Jour
- Thread starter The Sicatoka
- Start date
- Status
solovsfett
Registered User
I don't know them. And by inference, no I don't believe in 9/11 conspiracies unless they involve 20 hijackers (1 caught)...
Do you realize how ignorant you are?
You're unaware of operation Ajax, operation success. You really should try reading history a bit.
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour
Lol. Just like how the owner of Tower 7 gave the command to blow up the building. Just like steel was proven to not melt from jet fuel. Just like everyone heard a secondary explosion in the basements.
You haven’t pointed to a single piece of concrete evidence but act like you have all the answers. Then you attack everyone who calls you out on it. Classic conspiracy theorist behavior.
I may be ignorant, but you’re delusional.
Lol. Just like how the owner of Tower 7 gave the command to blow up the building. Just like steel was proven to not melt from jet fuel. Just like everyone heard a secondary explosion in the basements.
You haven’t pointed to a single piece of concrete evidence but act like you have all the answers. Then you attack everyone who calls you out on it. Classic conspiracy theorist behavior.
I may be ignorant, but you’re delusional.
solovsfett
Registered User
No Fonzi was not a theorist. He was a congressional investigator and investigative reporter. What he found for the church committee led directly to the opening of the HSCA.
solovsfett
Registered User
Good grief. Facts are facts. You can say they're something else but congress disagrees with you, history disagrees with you and you're ignorance is unfortunate. I know you're smart so it's disappointing to see you won't read or listen to investigators.
And again,I don't believe in 9/11 **** that doesn't involve 20 hijackers, UBL sheik Mohammed and bin al sheib.
leswp1
Well-known member
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour
See quote A proven by Quote C
See quote A proven by Quote C
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour
It would stink if the documents suggest a coup d'etat by the governmental agency(ies) against a sitting president.
I think a lot of our innocence died that day. If JFK was killed by a CIA (or some other agency) sponsor, you can kiss the rest of it goodbye and dark thoughts will govern most people's opinion of what the government does.
Kep will vomit, but this is where Ronny should be the guy in the big chair.
It would stink if the documents suggest a coup d'etat by the governmental agency(ies) against a sitting president.
I think a lot of our innocence died that day. If JFK was killed by a CIA (or some other agency) sponsor, you can kiss the rest of it goodbye and dark thoughts will govern most people's opinion of what the government does.
Kep will vomit, but this is where Ronny should be the guy in the big chair.
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour
To me, it's not a matter of who did it, but WHY they did it (or who was the motive behind it). My personal belief is mob ties, not a lone madman or whatever. The lone madman might have actually committed the act; why did he do it?
To me, it's not a matter of who did it, but WHY they did it (or who was the motive behind it). My personal belief is mob ties, not a lone madman or whatever. The lone madman might have actually committed the act; why did he do it?
solovsfett
Registered User
Concrete evidence of two shooters: FBI agents Francis O'Neill and James Sibert signing for receipt of a "missle" aka bullet, at Bethesda. So tell me, what conclusion do you draw from that straight up fact?
WC has one bullet missing the car, one entering Connelly after 6other turns and angles etc and one shattering after hitting jfk's head.
So? there is no-one anywhere denying the FBI signed for a 4th bullet and anything more than 3 = 2 or more shooters.
And to add fuel to the fire there's a photo of an FBI agent picking a bullet out of the grass on the south side of the plaza and the statements of two naval cadets sent to the limo to retrieve skull fragments at the end of the autopsy at Bethesda. They found a bullet in the car. Now we're up to 6.
But you refuse to investigate any of this.
If you refuse at this point to review even one of these facts or sources I ask you one to look at one related fact. Operation Northwoods. See what you find.
Last edited:
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you...
aparch
Acetaminamerican
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour
Huh. Interesting. Thanks for starting me down the Wikipedia rabbit hole.
Huh. Interesting. Thanks for starting me down the Wikipedia rabbit hole.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour
leave a trail of bread crumbs!!!!
Huh. Interesting. Thanks for starting me down the Wikipedia rabbit hole.
leave a trail of bread crumbs!!!!
leave a trail of bread crumbs!!!!
And make a donation!
dxmnkd316
Lucia Apologist
Re: Conspiracy Theory Du Jour
If you’re right, it will become a consensus conclusion and I’ll buy into it. Yet it’s just you and a handful of people who think they have all the answers. If there was concrete proof (again, all you offer is pictures up for interpretation, someone picking up a missile which clearly means bullet for Kennedy
, accounts of two people doing something which obvious means it’s nefarious, ) the media and public would have a different consensus opinion.
If you’re right, it will become a consensus conclusion and I’ll buy into it. Yet it’s just you and a handful of people who think they have all the answers. If there was concrete proof (again, all you offer is pictures up for interpretation, someone picking up a missile which clearly means bullet for Kennedy
, accounts of two people doing something which obvious means it’s nefarious, ) the media and public would have a different consensus opinion.solovsfett
Registered User
If you’re right, it will become a consensus conclusion and I’ll buy into it. Yet it’s just you and a handful of people who think they have all the answers. If there was concrete proof (again, all you offer is pictures up for interpretation, someone picking up a missile which clearly means bullet for Kennedy
It will become a definite conclusion over time with the media. But it will take a long time (read about operation mockingbird also the CIA media budget is enormous, at least double that of the AP and BBC combined)If you read Phil shenon, Larry sabato, max holland or Gerald poster ( all WC apologists) you'll find they can't bring themselves to acknowledge the simple fact that every person Oswald connected with in the last 1 1/2 year of his life were CIA or FBI agents or assets. It's why senator schweiker said "Oswald has the fingerprints of intelligence all over him". It's why sent Fonzi in secret to investigate and lay groundwork for what would become the HSCA.
Herminio Ruiz admitted he was a shooter in Dallas. Unfortunately he expired in 1966.
No less tan 3 CIA officers (Dave Phillips, David Morales and Howard Hunt) admitted there was a plot toward the end of their lives.
in his book "man of the house" Tip O'Neill recounted a story of a dinner with JFK aides Ken O'Donnell and Dave Powers in 1979. Both men stated unequivocally shots came from out front behind the fence. Both stated they felt like they drive into an ambush. O'Neill pressed them "why didn't you tell the WC this?" The response? "That wasn't what they wanted to hear".O'Neill follows up. " I wouldn't have caved, I would have told them the truth"...I'm paraphrasing here but that's the gist of it.
There are at least two films, possibly 3, taken from the south side of elm. The originals for all 3 were never returned to the owner' and when Nix received a copy of his film he felt it was altered. Who knows? We do know the 3rd film taken allegedly by Beverly Oliver who stood much closer than zapruder and was facing the fence and rail yards, that film has never been seen by the public.
Anyway the long and short of it is Allen Dulles authored this ugly chapter. David Talbot chronicles this in The Devil' Chessboard.
solovsfett
Registered User
Huh. Interesting. Thanks for starting me down the Wikipedia rabbit hole.
More
Operation AJax = overthrow of modsadegh in inran
Operation Success = overthrow of Arbenz in Guatemala
Operation Sunrise = hide/ protect nazi Eugene dollman or Karl Wolff from enclosing allies. Both men were protected by Allen Dulles
It's all ugly stuff
Last edited:
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
- Status