What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

College Football 2022: “Here’s a twenty, bury two.”

Status
Not open for further replies.
MichVandal said:
So it’s ok if someone does it on their own? The big schools have to have large and rich enough fan bases to easily do that.

Besides, the video that teams get at least show the visitors signals for every play.
Click to expand...

If they do do it on their own, then it comes down to doing it in a way that's not obvious. The reports seem to indicate every other B1G team knew it was happening, so they must have done a poor job hiding it. Don't get me wrong, it's a dumb rule that I didn't even realize existed until yesterday and it seems easy to find ways around it, but, you know, do so in a more subtle way.
 
MissThundercat said:
*checks Michigan vs. State score*

I'm all GO BLUE, but I thought State would have made an effort tonight.
Click to expand...
It’s almost as if their emotional effort overdid the actual effort. Some really bad penalties to take out there.

I get being angry losing this badly, but would you rather have them take a knee?
 
MichVandal said:
So Michigan is being accused of sign stealing. Given that every team does multiple signs or odd patterns or whatever, why is this a huge scandal? Apparently, MSU considered canceling the game due to the health and safety of the players.

huh?

Id be more concerned about fan safety having a massive rivalry game at night.
Click to expand...

Did they play Tech the night before anyway? :-D
 
How 'bout them Utes! *don't even ask
They had a pretty telling stat on SC this am about USC; they've lost 11 of 13 games against AP ranked opponents.
 
SonofSouthie said:
How 'bout them Utes! *don't even ask
They had a pretty telling stat on SC this am about USC; they've lost 11 of 13 games against AP ranked opponents.
Click to expand...

That was a fun game to watch, especially how Williams lost the chance to b2b the heisman. On the back of a dumb head to head on the QB- don’t they know better?
 
MichVandal said:
That was a fun game to watch, especially how Williams lost the chance to b2b the heisman. On the back of a dumb head to head on the QB- don’t they know better?
Click to expand...

Though it was properly called a roughing the passer, it was not targeting. Not even close to the defintion of targeting. I know it doesn't matter (other than the player doesn't play in the first half of the next game), but I hate when the refs make up rules just because "it looked bad."
 
Russell Jaslow said:
Though it was properly called a roughing the passer, it was not targeting. Not even close to the defintion of targeting. I know it doesn't matter (other than the player doesn't play in the first half of the next game), but I hate when the refs make up rules just because "it looked bad."
Click to expand...

The only thing that makes it bad is that he led with his helmet- even if it was just the facemask. It kind of met the definition of leading with your head. Even though I've seen that exact same hit not even called.
 
MichVandal said:
The only thing that makes it bad is that he led with his helmet- even if it was just the facemask. It kind of met the definition of leading with your head. Even though I've seen that exact same hit not even called.
Click to expand...

I believe the rule is written leading with the crown of the helmet. Not the facemask.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top