Fighting Sioux 23
New member
And that's where my opinion has firmly ensconced itself. I think playoffs are awful**. With a few exceptions (Stanley Cup, for example). Single elimination to crown the "best" team? Nah. They're the playoff champions. The best team is whomever is evaluated so by the sum of their accomplishments. Like the Gophers being crowned AP #1 in 60. They lost the Rose Bowl but were still voted #1. Winning the McNaughton was always much more difficult than even winning the NCAA title. You had to churn through 30 games against top caliber (and some dreck) every year.
If we treated playoffs as what they really are, TV fodder, then sure, do whatever. I'm in. And maybe that's MY problem and not everyone else's.
**I guess I don't have a problem with playoffs themselves. I just hate the idea that they give you the best team. It's a RNG. Entertaining and sometimes a lot of fun. But the best team is generally a subjective
The Gophers were voted #1 in 1960 before losing in the Rose Bowl. They almost certainly would not have been voted #1 if the poll had been taken after the Rose Bowl. They robbed Ole Miss of a national title. But...that's how they did it back then.
As to going to 12, it's a weird choice. I would have gone to 8 (Power 5 Champions, Top Group of 5 Champion, and 2 at-large). If they go to 12, I can only imagine the outcry (from me and others) when 5 SEC teams get in. But...that's how it looks like they will be doing it going forward.