I've seen your posts over the years. You've taken it too far in your battle with Chuck but just so I am clear...I think Cav has done a very good job at UConn and would have no problem if he's the guy who gets the job.
Honestly, personal feelings aside, I think the best you can credit Luce for on 9 years at UConn is "decent", and that reflects a slight upgrade for this year's results. In my opinion, you have to save
very good for someone who's been at his current job (in the same conference) for a couple of seasons less, started out pretty much the same (if not worse) in the dregs of the league, and has since gone on to win a couple of conference titles, made multiple FF trips AND won a National Title. And if Ms. Luce wants further "credit" for the shortened Covid-19 season, the guy at UMass may have been gypped out of a 2nd D-1 title. That (Carvel) is actually what an
exceptional job looks like; ditto Walshy and York. A
very good job looks more like this:
9 seasons, 8 winning records, 3 trips to the HEA Title game, 2 HEA RS titles, 6 trips to the NCAA's, 2 trips to the FF (Umile)
9 seasons, 8 winning records, 6 trips to HEA Finals w/3 Titles, 2 HEA RS titles, 5 trips to the NCAA's, 1 trip to the FF (Bazin)
Very good arguably looks like this as well:
9 seasons, 6 winning records, 2 trips to the HEA Finals w/2 Titles, 3 trips to the NCAA's (Madigan)
Very good doesn't look like this:
9 seasons, 2 winning records (one in HEA); one trip to the HEA Title game (Luce)
I think BC can do MUCH better than Luce. But if that's who you're OK with, don't let me stop you. ;-)