What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

According to right wingers, the 16 year old from Covington Catholic is an angel who thinks for himself, but Greta and other young climate activists are puppets. Got it.
 
MissThundercat said:
According to right wingers, the 16 year old from Covington Catholic is an angel who thinks for himself, but Greta and other young climate activists are puppets. Got it.
Click to expand...

Not quite, but one was instantly condemned by the MSM and one was instantly exalted. Subsequent revelations revealed that the MSM was in a rush to judgment on the former. We await to see what happens to the latter.

"When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
- The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

joecct said:
Not quite, but one was instantly condemned by the MSM and one was instantly exalted. Subsequent revelations revealed that the MSM was in a rush to judgment on the former. We await to see what happens to the latter.

"When the legend becomes fact, print the legend."
- The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance
Click to expand...

You think maybe Greta molests priests or something? *** do you think is going to come out? Soros is her daddy?
 
joecct said:
This was interesting. Maybe it's not all us.

https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/Milankovitch/milankovitch_3.php
Click to expand...

I’m in the middle of a graduate program on climate change so I’m gonna add something here as it’s literally something I’m deep in every day.

Climate has always changed. And for the millions of years before the last few hundred years, it wasn’t us. Volcanoes and the asteroid and things like that helped move us through changes.
But since the industrial revolution and our burning of fossil fuels? It’s really and truly mostly us. I’ve enjoyed looking at the science from IPCC and several other institutions and they all agree. All.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

So here's the real interesting thought that I keep having.

It's pretty obvious that the only real entity that gains by the climate change denial is the oil and coal industries. But the really funny thing is that the true economic conservative, who really, REALLY, thinks about how much stuff costs and how much opportunity is for growth should be on the opposite side of that. Why? See China- they see the enormous opportunity in growth of solar and nuclear power. There's HUGE opportunity in making power in any other way than just burning stuff.

Somehow, people like joe just can't see the obvious opportunity. Not sure why.

The same people can't see that resources are finite- regardless of the fact we keep finding more coal and oil- but that's getting harder and harder to find. Again, a real conservative would want to CONSERVE their resources to make them last as long as possible. But no, seeing the growth financial opportunity and noting that conserving is in their name just does not sway any of them. Not sure why. The more you argue the science, the more they dig in and pretend that burning stuff is the way to go.

Funny how that is.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

alfablue said:
So here's the real interesting thought that I keep having.

It's pretty obvious that the only real entity that gains by the climate change denial is the oil and coal industries. But the really funny thing is that the true economic conservative, who really, REALLY, thinks about how much stuff costs and how much opportunity is for growth should be on the opposite side of that. Why? See China- they see the enormous opportunity in growth of solar and nuclear power. There's HUGE opportunity in making power in any other way than just burning stuff.

Somehow, people like joe just can't see the obvious opportunity. Not sure why.

The same people can't see that resources are finite- regardless of the fact we keep finding more coal and oil- but that's getting harder and harder to find. Again, a real conservative would want to CONSERVE their resources to make them last as long as possible. But no, seeing the growth financial opportunity and noting that conserving is in their name just does not sway any of them. Not sure why. The more you argue the science, the more they dig in and pretend that burning stuff is the way to go.

Funny how that is.
Click to expand...

Pretty easy to figure out. Fossil is an easy, simple buck. The technology is done. The gas stations are in place. The rest requires investment, gamble, and research. It's the same reason Pharma does what it does. It costs them a ton of money to research and get a new drug on the market. That's cost none of these investment clowns want to deal with, they'd rather just have the steady stream of incoming cash.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

alfablue said:
Again, a real conservative would want to CONSERVE their resources to make them last as long as possible.
Click to expand...

There are no conservatives anymore.

They detect a barrier to Plute predation and reflexively oppose it to keep their Weltanschauung coherent. There's nothing deeper than that.

They are not thinking. They are on ideological autopilot. They are the Cambodian soldiers in Apocalypse Now cutting off their children's arms.
 
Last edited:
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Outside of American herpa-derps nearly the entire rest of the freaking planet has accepted the science and agrees that man has influenced the climate to a negative factor over and above natural cyclical progression.

Think about that.
 
Slap Shot said:
Outside of American herpa-derps nearly the entire rest of the freaking planet has accepted the science and agrees that man has influenced the climate to a negative factor over and above natural cyclical progression.

Think about that.
Click to expand...
The same nations that reject climate change are also the only three nations to use imperial measurements.

<img width=400 src=https://www.labmuffin.com/labmuffin/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/archer-metric-system.png>
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Interesting, but not sure it belongs in the climate change thread. From the article:
The shelf is essentially the floating extension of a number of glaciers that flow off the land into the sea. Losing bergs to the ocean is how these ice streams maintain equilibrium, balancing the input of snow upstream...

The Scripps researcher stressed that there was no link between this event and climate change. Satellite data since the 1990s has shown that Amery is roughly in balance with its surroundings, despite experiencing strong surface melt in summer.

"While there is much to be concerned about in Antarctica, there is no cause for alarm yet for this particular ice shelf," Prof Fricker added.
Click to expand...
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Really wasn’t anywhere else to put it. Could be issue for ships too.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

alfablue said:
So here's the real interesting thought that I keep having.

It's pretty obvious that the only real entity that gains by the climate change denial is the oil and coal industries. But the really funny thing is that the true economic conservative, who really, REALLY, thinks about how much stuff costs and how much opportunity is for growth should be on the opposite side of that. Why? See China- they see the enormous opportunity in growth of solar and nuclear power. There's HUGE opportunity in making power in any other way than just burning stuff.

Somehow, people like joe just can't see the obvious opportunity. Not sure why.

The same people can't see that resources are finite- regardless of the fact we keep finding more coal and oil- but that's getting harder and harder to find. Again, a real conservative would want to CONSERVE their resources to make them last as long as possible. But no, seeing the growth financial opportunity and noting that conserving is in their name just does not sway any of them. Not sure why. The more you argue the science, the more they dig in and pretend that burning stuff is the way to go.

Funny how that is.
Click to expand...

I’ve been saying for years now: green technology is goi got see a shift of trillions of dollars in global wealth, whether we participate or not.

I’d rather we did, regardless of whether climate change is real. (It is.)
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

alfablue said:
It's pretty obvious that the only real entity that gains by the climate change denial is the oil and coal industries.
Click to expand...

climate change is inconvenient because people have to be willing to change their lifestyle. It's easier to just say its all made up.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

BassAle said:
climate change is inconvenient because people have to be willing to change their lifestyle. It's easier to just say its all made up.
Click to expand...

That’s the insane thing, it doesn’t require you change that much even. We have the technology.

As much as I hate Teslas and think they’re garbage, we have a (somewhat) working model to fix cars. We have solar technology that could work if everyone had rooftop grids. The list is endless.

Just subsidize the green tech.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

In think Germany is now completely on renewables.

It isn’t that hard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top