What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

CC @ RPI, Saturday, October 29th

Re: CC @ RPI, Saturday, October 29th

End of the first period CC leads 1-0. Decent period for RPI but the power play just is doing nothing. We have to do more than just pass the puck around the periphery. I suspect much of that might change with the return of the injured forwards who usually play the PP. Defensively again-we seem solid.

Considering the CC's goal was short-handed, RPI did less than nothing on the powerplay. :( They seemed to be doing more yesterday. Perhaps SA berated the team for taking even up penalties, so they are more tentative now.
 
Last edited:
Re: CC @ RPI, Saturday, October 29th

OK, RPI hockey team... This...

inglascoblackpuck.jpg


and this...

rbk-hockey-goal-net1.gif


are currently two positively charged ions. For those who realize the materials do not carry any sort of magnetic properties, pretend they do, work with me here, people. We need to reverse the polarity on one of these. It seems that the puck is repelled by the net. We need to put the two together. And I don't mean the back side. :eek:
 
Re: CC @ RPI, Saturday, October 29th

10-8 in CC's favor according to the live stats.

I think there were a lot of dangerous loose pucks out front that never made it all the way on goal. Which is related to our simply not being big and strong enough on the puck.
 
Re: CC @ RPI, Saturday, October 29th

I agree with your assessment, although it's easier said than done. CC (and ND and Ferris) are just so much bigger, stronger, and faster than our guys that there simply isn't room to operate other than around the periphery. CC is stretching themselves, though, and we've almost caught them on several cross-ice passes. Toward the end of the period, Cullen nearly found Schroeder on one of the passes as CC was puck-chasing.

i hope so-we have looked weak on the PP so far in all the games. Improvement there would make an incredible difference for this team that seems to have their defense well worked out-just need to get those few extra goals that the PP could give us.
 
Re: CC @ RPI, Saturday, October 29th

I think there were a lot of dangerous loose pucks out front that never made it all the way on goal. Which is related to our simply not being big and strong enough on the puck.

This line up we have out there just does not have the finishers. They are physical enough and try hard-but we have a limited number of guys who are snipers and most of them are out hurt.
 
Re: CC @ RPI, Saturday, October 29th

i hope so-we have looked weak on the PP so far in all the games. Improvement there would make an incredible difference for this team that seems to have their defense well worked out-just need to get those few extra goals that the PP could give us.

I also think this will ultimately work to our benefit, as we'll be sharper, faster, and crisper when we face ECAC PK's, where we'll have a lot more room to operate.
 
Re: CC @ RPI, Saturday, October 29th

This line up we have out there just does not have the finishers. They are physical enough and try hard-but we have a limited number of guys who are snipers and most of them are out hurt.
[/I]

I totally agree with that assessment. Last night we had many chances on the power play. A number of tip opportunities, and none of them found the net. We just don't have the players out there that we need to score on the power play at this time.
 
Re: CC @ RPI, Saturday, October 29th

When you look at our PK stats-remember that the 2 empty net goals yesterday were considered as PP goals. We were short handed. That kind of alters the numbers a bit.
 
Back
Top