fabricated fuel
Howzatwork? Wouldn't making our own fuels out of inert materials require putting in more energy than we take out? Or is the benefit the portability of the latter, so for example you use a central point to expend 10 quadrillion Btu to make 5 quadrillion Btu of portable fuel which is then distributed across all vehicles all over and is thus of more use?
Well, alcohol is a fabricated fuel. Bio diesel is a fabricated fuel. And Porsche has a system that removes CO2 from the environment and turns that into fuel. H2 is fabricated fuel. So there are paths out there to supply with world with *some* fabricated fuel.
I'm actually more optimistic about waste paths to fuel than BEVs. We've been extracting natural gas from garbage piles for decades- so there's a process that at least exists. The only caveat is that the potential of switch grass to fuel seems to be the same as nuclear fusion- always 20 years out.
As for efficiency- there are factors that make it less important than most think. Not to brush it off at all, but if one could fabricate millions of barrels of gasoline like fuel using wind turbines and solar plants- it would be easier to fully implement than BEV's as far as I can see.
Still get hit with the carbon effect though, right?
Do we eventually (2075?) get engines with 100% carbon recapture and no longer have to worry* about greenhouse gases?
* We would still need atmospheric carbon reuptake to repair the damage we've done.
But there are so many other areas that produce massive amounts of CO2 that one should not fixate on transportation. It's just one of many.
Still get hit with the carbon effect though, right?
Do we eventually (2075?) get engines with 100% carbon recapture and no longer have to worry* about greenhouse gases?
* We would still need atmospheric carbon reuptake to repair the damage we've done.
I have a car biatch that will probably resonate mostly with olds living in picket fence country. With the proliferation of LED headlights market wide and the preference in small town America for BIG suvs and BIG pickups, driving at night sucks big time for those of us who drive smaller Hondas and Toyotas. Whether they are oncoming or in your rear view, those vehicles all seems to have their brights on. How is a person supposed to run to the store after dark for ice cream and stool softener?
That's why leaving the lights on automatic is the best. It will dim with other cars anywhere near.
You mean others ought to leave their lights on auto? That is either not happening or it does not help those with smaller cars. I could just get a Tahoe or Suburban or F250.
Chuck, most people would consider someone claiming that they had sex with them while they were married and after they sold them cocaine which they both smoked before said sex to be defamatory regardless of the gender of that someone, but I understand the rules might be different in New Hampshire.
If people are leaving their high beams on, yes. If it’s just size, your rant stands.
I'm not saying people aren't dimming. It's a combination of brighter lights and a crazy need for big vehicles.
Obama admitted to an affair? Huh, missed have missed that story. Drug use in youth is one thing, but while an adult with a political career and family is another. So, to repeat, someone who admitted to some youthful drug use could very easily be defamed by a claim of adult drug use and extra-marital sex in a hotel room (with implied payment via the sex), regardless of who made that claim, as any reasonable person with character left to defame could see the difference.