c'mon!! it's a scheme to keep hilly from getting the nomination!![]()
The WaPo is so far in the tank for HRC, you could film Titanic in it.
c'mon!! it's a scheme to keep hilly from getting the nomination!![]()
Really? I can vote for legislators who can vote to disenfranchise convicted felons. I can vote for legislators who restrict the right to vote to citizens only. I can vote for legislators who restrict who I may marry.
Granted, it does not matter anymore as a judge can do what he wants regardless of the other 2 branches of government.
Anyone else see that Charles Koch came out and supported Sanders opinions on campaign finances. How it is tipped in favor of the privileged. Not sure if this means he supports overturning Citizens United.
.....a like minded justice for the SCOTUS if the Senate continues to stonewall.
Another interesting question is if there are any backroom deals made with potential nominees. It's fairly certain that the nominee won't even get considered, and if there are hearings, every possible piece of dirty laundry will get brought up. If I were a potential nominee, I'd like assurance if my nomination is never acted upon, that my nomination wouldn't get withdrawn or that I'd be re-nominated. That would require backroom negotiating between Obama and the Clinton and Sanders camps and would open up the possibility that Clinton or Sanders or both would have a say in who gets nominated.Things get interesting if the polls start going in the toilet for the GOP. What happens if Obama nominates a Souter and the GOP stonewalls but then we're in September and the polls have Cruz 15 points down to Hillary with the Senate looking like a 10-seat pick-up for the Dems?
Does the GOP do a 180 and confirm?
Does Obama withdraw the nomination in preference to Hillary putting up a Douglas?
Yeah, I don't see the nominee having any leverage, nor to be honest really thinking in those terms. A SCOTUS nomination is a bolt from the blue, and typically* it is bestowed on someone with zero political clout.
* There have been exceptions, of course. Taft being the most obvious, but also Warren, and Salmon P. Chase who had a fascinating career:
Senator, Ohio, 1849–1855, 1861
Governor of Ohio, 1856-1860
Candidate for President, 1860 Republican National Convention
Secretary of the Treasury, 1861-1864
Chief Justice of the United States, 1864-1873
Holy crap!
You missed the most interesting thing about Chase. He was on the $10,000 bill, the largest denomination ever circulated for public commerce in the U.S., and of course the subject of the famous Binion Million Dollar Display at Binion's Horseshoe Las Vegas Casino.and Salmon P. Chase who had a fascinating career:
Senator, Ohio, 1849–1855, 1861
Governor of Ohio, 1856-1860
Candidate for President, 1860 Republican National Convention
Secretary of the Treasury, 1861-1864
Candidate for President, 1868 Democratic National Convention
Chief Justice of the United States, 1864-1873
Holy crap!
Things get interesting if the polls start going in the toilet for the GOP. What happens if Obama nominates a Souter and the GOP stonewalls but then we're in September and the polls have Cruz 15 points down to Hillary with the Senate looking like a 10-seat pick-up for the Dems?
Does the GOP do a 180 and confirm?
Does Obama withdraw the nomination in preference to Hillary putting up a Douglas?
What if, God forbid, Trump emerges as the frontrunner in Oct lets say. Do you really want Trump choosing the next SCOTUS??? I wonder if the Senate Dems go to Obama and say give us somebody quasi-moderate so we don't have to deal with a Sarah Palin nomination come January.![]()
![]()
![]()
I can't see the GOP budging in any case. If Trump nominates the wrong kind of nutter they just vote them down and preen about their "independence." OTOH, if Trumps sends them Scalia with a grade school education, they use the nuke option to confirm. They can't lose.
This is starting to look like the biggest game of poker the US government has ever been involved in.