What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an election

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Someone needs to give iCarly not only a Civics lesson, but also advice about not getting recorded making comments then lying about it later. ;)
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Someone needs to give iCarly not only a Civics lesson, but also advice about not getting recorded making comments then lying about it later. ;)

I think the suck up wind generated by the press just shifted from Carly to Rubio earlier this week and she can go back to trying to find those secret videos... ;)

Moving on, the old boy has diagnosed the problem correctly but is a little light on the solutions IMHO...

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/bernie-sanders-naive-obama-214222
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Moving on, the old boy has diagnosed the problem correctly but is a little light on the solutions IMHO...

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/bernie-sanders-naive-obama-214222

Not that the old girl's come up with anything better.

I think he's actually quite correct about the solution. People (like me) who want to see Bernie's policies enacted should also be hoping for a wave election with big Democratic majorities in both chambers. That would also really put the Democratic party to the test, since his major reforms would send the 1% into paroxysms of bribery. Would we wind up with establishment Democrats voting down liberal Democratic measures so they could keep suckling at the withered teat of the donor class?

If we vote in Bernie with a Republican Congress then we'll have complete gridlock, and we'll deserve it. This one's on the voters.
 
Last edited:
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Not that the old girl's come up with anything better.

I think he's actually quite correct about the solution. People (like me) who want to see Bernie's policies enacted should also be hoping for a wave election with big Democratic majorities in both chambers. That would also really put the Democratic party to the test, since his major reforms would send the 1% into paroxysms of bribery. Would we wind up with establishment Democrats voting down liberal Democratic measures so they could keep suckling at the withered teat of the donor class?

If we vote in Bernie with a Republican Congress then we'll have complete gridlock, and we'll deserve it. This one's on the voters.

He (or she) needs to grab the mantle of reforming the whole voting process. What I want to see either of them say is 1) the problem is gerrymandering. The states of Ohio, Florida, and Michigan (IIRC) allow citizens to put initiatives on the ballot to put redistricting in the hands of an independent commission. I will push for that in 2016 and will prompt court challenges in other places. 2) President Obama's executive orders have been spot on correct. I will use and expand this option within the confines of the law.

Yes, I get we should organize and vote more people out, especially since about 26 current GOP reps sit in Obama won districts. The GOP has a 30 seat majority. But, I want to see a party leader playing chess while everybody else plays checkers. Lets go for the throat here. I want to see more viciousness out of Bernie. :eek:
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

He (or she) needs to grab the mantle of reforming the whole voting process. What I want to see either of them say is 1) the problem is gerrymandering. The states of Ohio, Florida, and Michigan (IIRC) allow citizens to put initiatives on the ballot to put redistricting in the hands of an independent commission. I will push for that in 2016 and will prompt court challenges in other places. 2) President Obama's executive orders have been spot on correct. I will use and expand this option within the confines of the law.

Yes, I get we should organize and vote more people out, especially since about 26 current GOP reps sit in Obama won districts. The GOP has a 30 seat majority. But, I want to see a party leader playing chess while everybody else plays checkers. Lets go for the throat here. I want to see more viciousness out of Bernie. :eek:

I agree with all of this. All elections are becoming more nationalized as the years pass. That should mean that, for instance, Senate seats and those few statewide House districts should align with the state's presidential vote. That doesn't help in the House, where gerrymandering and self-segregation have made the majority of seats single party dictatorships.

Draining out the money will help; rolling back the new Jim Crow laws will help; non-partisan math-drawn districts would help; but if we live in a highly partisan and self-segregated country, we're still going to wind up with armies of wingnuts who either won't want to compromise because they were grown in Heritage Foundation vats, or won't be able to for fear of being flanked by someone even crazier. As long as Average Joe Citizen keeps returning those guys to office, Congress will continue to do nothing.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Not sure how one can look at the beautiful figures drawn for the MA house seats and claim it all a R shenanigan.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Not sure how one can look at the beautiful figures drawn for the MA house seats and claim it all a R shenanigan.

That's not the claim, although 538 ran an interesting analysis that purported to show that nationally gerrymandering does actually disproportionately favor Republicans right now. But that could change.

But the best thing about gerrymandering is that it is theoretically party neutral, meaning we could, maybe, get reform. The eye on the ball with gerrymandering is that the incumbents of both parties are ganging up to deny us small-d democratic elections (and also barring the door to third parties at the same time). This is a fight we might win, if we identify the real enemy -- sitting Members.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Now that Carly Fiorina has come out in support of Torture it's become pretty clear that she (like most Republicans) is entitled to her own facts. Cause she keeps correcting everyone else on the actual facts with her made up ones.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Do they just not know?

It's mind-boggling that these guys never learn, even when all the facts are in. Everybody told them torture wouldn't work and would just backfire in the global community. So they tortured and it didn't work and it backfired in the global community. And their response is to be... pro-torture?

I've always argued they aren't dumb, just misinformed. But maybe they're just dumb?

Anyway... reason #217 why these sickos can't be allowed back into power.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

torture is a waste. no reason to take prisoners and this fairy tail idea to get information out of them leads to pow's.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Uh oh.

For the past week, Jeb Bush’s campaign advisers have been using a new data point to convince nervous donors that he’s still the candidate to beat: Bush’s lead in the political prediction markets.

Just one problem: Beginning Sunday night, PredictIt, the biggest of the online sites and the one referenced last week by top Bush advisers and confidants, placed Florida Sen. Marco Rubio ahead of Bush at the head of the GOP pack.

I guess he still has a lead in sheer dollars. For now.

That safety net, of course, may not be there forever. Beyond the symbolic importance of posting a solid third-quarter fundraising number, Bush has another set of expectations to meet to convince donors he’s still the candidate best-suited for a marathon campaign — the efficacy of his super PAC’s first $25 million in television ads, set to run out next month.

“If this $25 million doesn’t move numbers, in two weeks, that’s when you’re going to see panic set in,” a donor said.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Of course not one hearing will ever be made about the corrupt operations using an investigation to purposely harm a candidate.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/kevin-mccarthy-grades-john-boehner-214253
“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable right? But we put together a Benghazi Special Committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping," McCarthy said. "Why? Cause she’s untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened had we not fought and made that happen,”
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Of course not one hearing will ever be made about the corrupt operations using an investigation to purposely harm a candidate.

You never know. The orcs won't run the House forever, and I'm sure a number of these "special witnesses" have perjured themselves. The GOP politicians are probably safe, but a few of their useful idiots may wind up with contempt charges.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Of course not one hearing will ever be made about the corrupt operations using an investigation to purposely harm a candidate.

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/kevin-mccarthy-grades-john-boehner-214253

The right has been screaming BENGHAZI!!!!!!! for a few years now, and Shrill's numbers were fine up until about three months ago. It's not their kangaroo court that has been her problem. It's the stupid email "scandal" that she failed to nip in the bud when she should have, coupled with Sanders' rise among young voters. She has no one but herself to blame for allowing both of those items to snowball.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

The right has been screaming BENGHAZI!!!!!!! for a few years now, and Shrill's numbers were fine up until about three months ago. It's not their kangaroo court that has been her problem. It's the stupid email "scandal" that she failed to nip in the bud when she should have, coupled with Sanders' rise among young voters. She has no one but herself to blame for allowing both of those items to snowball.

Their effectiveness doesn't change intent to abuse their positions.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

The right has been screaming BENGHAZI!!!!!!! for a few years now, and Shrill's numbers were fine up until about three months ago. It's not their kangaroo court that has been her problem. It's the stupid email "scandal" that she failed to nip in the bud when she should have, coupled with Sanders' rise among young voters. She has no one but herself to blame for allowing both of those items to snowball.

I'm sorry but this is absurd. The notion that if she'd only done xyz earlier and apologized and the Republicans would had nothing to feed the lazy media. :rolleyes: Do you really believe that BS? Do you work for the New York Times or the Washington Post?

Here in realityland, the GOP would have come up with something, anything, to try and turn into a scandal. The press would have run with it fact checking and significance be ****ed because that's what they do. And before some of his supporters get mad at me, they would have done the same thing with Sanders if he was the front runner.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

Uh oh.



I guess he still has a lead in sheer dollars. For now.

I was talking with my dad the other night and the election came up. He thinks that Rubio is going to end up with the nomination. It's between him and Jeb! for the job. He thinks Fiorina will start to decline as the opinions of the HP brain trust start to filter out. Sounds like the Hewlitt and the Packard families just hate her. He thinks Cruz the Cannuck would never get the backing of the money because he's just not electable. Walker was their guy until it became obvious to them that he's going to be impossible to get into the office.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

I was talking with my dad the other night and the election came up. He thinks that Rubio is going to end up with the nomination. It's between him and Jeb! for the job. He thinks Fiorina will start to decline as the opinions of the HP brain trust start to filter out. Sounds like the Hewlitt and the Packard families just hate her. He thinks Cruz the Cannuck would never get the backing of the money because he's just not electable. Walker was their guy until it became obvious to them that he's going to be impossible to get into the office.

I do not understand at all the fascination with Rubio. I just don't get it. Not referring to your discussion at all, just my observation on not understanding where the Rubio traction is coming from.
 
Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect

I do not understand at all the fascination with Rubio. I just don't get it. Not referring to your discussion at all, just my observation on not understanding where the Rubio traction is coming from.

I think people like him because he's more likely to deliver Florida than the other candidates.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top