Someone needs to give iCarly not only a Civics lesson, but also advice about not getting recorded making comments then lying about it later.![]()
Moving on, the old boy has diagnosed the problem correctly but is a little light on the solutions IMHO...
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/bernie-sanders-naive-obama-214222
Not that the old girl's come up with anything better.
I think he's actually quite correct about the solution. People (like me) who want to see Bernie's policies enacted should also be hoping for a wave election with big Democratic majorities in both chambers. That would also really put the Democratic party to the test, since his major reforms would send the 1% into paroxysms of bribery. Would we wind up with establishment Democrats voting down liberal Democratic measures so they could keep suckling at the withered teat of the donor class?
If we vote in Bernie with a Republican Congress then we'll have complete gridlock, and we'll deserve it. This one's on the voters.
He (or she) needs to grab the mantle of reforming the whole voting process. What I want to see either of them say is 1) the problem is gerrymandering. The states of Ohio, Florida, and Michigan (IIRC) allow citizens to put initiatives on the ballot to put redistricting in the hands of an independent commission. I will push for that in 2016 and will prompt court challenges in other places. 2) President Obama's executive orders have been spot on correct. I will use and expand this option within the confines of the law.
Yes, I get we should organize and vote more people out, especially since about 26 current GOP reps sit in Obama won districts. The GOP has a 30 seat majority. But, I want to see a party leader playing chess while everybody else plays checkers. Lets go for the throat here. I want to see more viciousness out of Bernie.![]()
Not sure how one can look at the beautiful figures drawn for the MA house seats and claim it all a R shenanigan.
For the past week, Jeb Bush’s campaign advisers have been using a new data point to convince nervous donors that he’s still the candidate to beat: Bush’s lead in the political prediction markets.
Just one problem: Beginning Sunday night, PredictIt, the biggest of the online sites and the one referenced last week by top Bush advisers and confidants, placed Florida Sen. Marco Rubio ahead of Bush at the head of the GOP pack.
That safety net, of course, may not be there forever. Beyond the symbolic importance of posting a solid third-quarter fundraising number, Bush has another set of expectations to meet to convince donors he’s still the candidate best-suited for a marathon campaign — the efficacy of his super PAC’s first $25 million in television ads, set to run out next month.
“If this $25 million doesn’t move numbers, in two weeks, that’s when you’re going to see panic set in,” a donor said.
“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable right? But we put together a Benghazi Special Committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping," McCarthy said. "Why? Cause she’s untrustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened had we not fought and made that happen,”
Of course not one hearing will ever be made about the corrupt operations using an investigation to purposely harm a candidate.
Of course not one hearing will ever be made about the corrupt operations using an investigation to purposely harm a candidate.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/09/kevin-mccarthy-grades-john-boehner-214253
The right has been screaming BENGHAZI!!!!!!! for a few years now, and Shrill's numbers were fine up until about three months ago. It's not their kangaroo court that has been her problem. It's the stupid email "scandal" that she failed to nip in the bud when she should have, coupled with Sanders' rise among young voters. She has no one but herself to blame for allowing both of those items to snowball.
The right has been screaming BENGHAZI!!!!!!! for a few years now, and Shrill's numbers were fine up until about three months ago. It's not their kangaroo court that has been her problem. It's the stupid email "scandal" that she failed to nip in the bud when she should have, coupled with Sanders' rise among young voters. She has no one but herself to blame for allowing both of those items to snowball.
I was talking with my dad the other night and the election came up. He thinks that Rubio is going to end up with the nomination. It's between him and Jeb! for the job. He thinks Fiorina will start to decline as the opinions of the HP brain trust start to filter out. Sounds like the Hewlitt and the Packard families just hate her. He thinks Cruz the Cannuck would never get the backing of the money because he's just not electable. Walker was their guy until it became obvious to them that he's going to be impossible to get into the office.
I do not understand at all the fascination with Rubio. I just don't get it. Not referring to your discussion at all, just my observation on not understanding where the Rubio traction is coming from.