ScoobyDoo
NPC
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XXIV: Both candidates are the same, but here's why yours is aw
She's a lunatic.
She's a lunatic.
Good point. Can't believe I forgot that one.
I think what you are seeing is that, much like Nate said over the weekend, we know enough about these candidates that the BS noise is really having zero effect. Each candidate has a range and they have kind of stuck to it since mid summer. The problem the GOP has always had is that Drumpf's highs are not high enough even against Hillary's lows. It is close (usually around 3 points) but outside of an outlier poll he never actually makes up the ground. Even when Nate is fatalistic about Hillary he admits that there is not likely scenario where she wins the Popular vote and loses the election. He has to win the PV to have any shot at winning the EV. (and he still could lose)
That is true but the numbers dont show that in Nevada which is what Rover is talking about. With the lead Hillary already has Drumpf would need to win the vast vast majority of the rest to take the state and that just isnt likely.
Rover is over the top...but he does not appear to be wrong when it comes to Nevada.
The problem with 538 (and it isnt a problem it just shows why it is kind of not relevant right now) is that we have actual votes to count and he leaves them out. (for obvious reasons) So while random polls maybe be throwing Nevada pink the actual votes are showing Nevada is Blue and you can say that (according to the named pollster) because 2/3 of the state has voted and her numbers so far have surpassed even Obamas.
(yes the caveat still holds that we can only go by the affiliations of who voted)
Just keep telling yourself that botboy.
At the risk of sounding hopelessly obtuse, would someone post copies of the two or three most incriminating emails. News OF the emails is everywhere, but the emails themselves are harder to find.
Or just post the cite.
Guilty.First bombshell, if you can cal it that, today is that the verdict in Bridgegate is in.
One of the most dam-ning pieces of evidence was an email in which Kelly wrote: "Time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee." Then, as the four days of gridlock unfolded and Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich complained about children unable to get to school, she texted: "Is it wrong that I am smiling?"
From the article:
To be fair, she never had a chance. Bridget was born for this.
Do you want the fiction, non-fiction or science fiction version of the emails?
How cooked ins Donald's goose? It's so cooked that Fox News has a graphic posted on their homepage stating that if every state they show as being a "toss-up" goes to Trump, he still loses the election.
Yes, but if it's within the margin of error, what are the odds he screams "FRAUD!11!!! I'LL SUE!1!! HUR DUR!" and follows through on it?
And what are the long-term consequences to the country of not completely repudiating his fascist candidacy with a blowout Clinton victory?
To be serious for a second...his only recourse is The Courts and they wont overturn the Election Results.